29.08.2014 Views

Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance - ppiaf

Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance - ppiaf

Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance - ppiaf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong><strong>Rail</strong>way</strong> <strong>Re<strong>for</strong>m</strong>: <strong>Toolkit</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Improving</strong> <strong>Rail</strong> <strong>Sector</strong> Per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

5. Creating the Industry Structure<br />

ernments lack financial and administrative capacity 60 . In principle, the national<br />

public company might compete with private train operators <strong>for</strong> the<br />

concession, which could include local rail infrastructure. Box 5.5 presumes a<br />

model of a private train operating a concession under a network access contract<br />

on a joint-user network administered by the national railway company.<br />

This type of train operating concession should be re-bid periodically to ensure<br />

competition.<br />

• Option 4: government adopts a policy of separating rail freight services into<br />

an independent commercial public company. Freight services are split from<br />

passenger service, staff and freight train operating assets are transferred into<br />

a new incorporated structure with separate accounts, board of directors, and<br />

shareholders—independent of other parts of railway business. The company<br />

would operate under a network access contract with the main public passenger<br />

company. This separation recognizes differences between freight and passenger<br />

transport customers, service needs, and economic drivers, not to mention<br />

different political profiles that typically result in higher resource allocations<br />

<strong>for</strong> passenger services when both freight and passenger transport are<br />

under the same corporation. 61<br />

60 Examples of different approaches include, <strong>for</strong> example, passenger rail concessions in<br />

Buenos Aires offered in concession by the national government (including the Metro) and<br />

the Rio de Janeiro metro and suburban rail services offered by the State government.<br />

61 Option 4 presumes that the archetypal railway has a substantial passenger role, that<br />

the freight company should be separated, and that the network and passenger services<br />

remain corporately connected. However, if rail-freight services predominate, and passenger<br />

services are marginal, horizontal separation to constitute passenger services as a<br />

separate train operating company would leave a vertically integrated freight company<br />

as the core public railway, offering network access under contract to the passenger<br />

company.<br />

The World Bank Page 80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!