31.10.2014 Views

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

124 CONIC SECTIONS<br />

only :<br />

p is simply the line to which the rectangle equal to QV 2<br />

and <strong>of</strong> width equal to PFis applied.<br />

2. Parallel chords are bisected by one straight line parallel to<br />

the axis, which passes through the point <strong>of</strong> contact <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tangent parallel to the chords.<br />

3. If the tangent at Q meet the diameter PV in T, and QV be<br />

the ordinate to the diameter, PV = PT.<br />

By the aid <strong>of</strong> this proposition a tangent to the parabola can<br />

be drawn (a) at a point on it, (b) parallel to a given chord.<br />

4. Another proposition assumed is equivalent to the property<br />

<strong>of</strong> the subnormal, NG = \<br />

rpa .<br />

5. If QQ' be a chord <strong>of</strong> a parabola perpendicular to the axis<br />

and meeting the axis in M, while QVq another chord parallel<br />

to the tangent at P meets the diameter through P in V, and<br />

RHK is the principal ordinate <strong>of</strong> any point R on the curve<br />

meeting PV in H and the axis in K, then PV :PH > or<br />

= MK : KA '<br />

for this is proved ' (On Floating Bodies, II. 6).<br />

;<br />

Where it was proved we do not know ; the pro<strong>of</strong> is not<br />

altogether easy. 1<br />

6. All parabolas are similar.<br />

As we have seen, Archimedes had to specialize in the<br />

parabola for the purpose <strong>of</strong> his treatises on the Quadrature<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Parabola, Conoids and Spheroids, Floating Bodies,<br />

Book II, and Plane Equilibriums, Book II ; consequently he<br />

had to prove for himself a number <strong>of</strong> special propositions, which<br />

have already been given in their proper places. A few others<br />

are assumed without pro<strong>of</strong>, doubtless as being. easy deductions<br />

from the propositions which he does prove. They refer mainly<br />

to similar parabolic segments so placed that their bases are in<br />

one straight line and have one common extremity.<br />

1. If any three similar and similarly situated parabolic<br />

segments BQ<br />

X 3<br />

lying along the same straight line<br />

, BQ<br />

2<br />

,<br />

BQ<br />

as bases (BQ 1<br />

< BQ 2<br />

< BQ 3 ), and if E be any point on the<br />

tangent at B to one <strong>of</strong> the segments, and EO a straight line<br />

through E parallel to the axis <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the segments and<br />

meeting the segments in R%, R 2<br />

,<br />

R<br />

in 0, then<br />

1<br />

respectively and BQ 3<br />

R,R :<br />

2<br />

R 2<br />

R, = (Q2 BQ<br />

Q3 :<br />

3 ) . (BQ, : Q, Q 2 ).<br />

1<br />

See Apollonius <strong>of</strong> Perga, ed. Heath, p. liv.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!