31.10.2014 Views

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

536 COMMENTATORS AND BYZANTINES<br />

regards this work. It contains 1 a description <strong>of</strong> the method<br />

<strong>of</strong> measuring the sun's apparent diameter by means <strong>of</strong><br />

Heron's water-clock, which, by comparison with the corresponding<br />

description in Theon's commentary to the Syntaxis<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ptolemy, is seen to have a common source with it. That<br />

source is Pappus, and, inasmuch as Proclus has a figure (reproduced<br />

by Manitius in his text from one set <strong>of</strong> manuscripts)<br />

corresponding to the description, while the text <strong>of</strong> Theon has<br />

no figure, it is clear that Proclus drew directly on Pappus,<br />

who doubtless gave, in his account <strong>of</strong> the procedure, a figure<br />

taken from Heron's own work on water-clocks. A simple<br />

pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the equivalence <strong>of</strong> the epicycle and eccentric hypotheses<br />

is quoted by Proclus from one Hilarius <strong>of</strong> Antioch. 2<br />

An interesting passage is that in chap. 4 (p. 130, 18) where<br />

Sosigenes the Peripatetic is said to have recorded in his work<br />

1<br />

on reacting spheres ' that an annular eclipse <strong>of</strong> the sun is<br />

sometimes observed at times <strong>of</strong> perigee ; this is, so far as<br />

I know, the only allusion in ancient times to annular eclipses,<br />

and Proclus himself questions the correctness <strong>of</strong> Sosigenes's<br />

statement.<br />

Commentary on<br />

the Republic.<br />

The commentary <strong>of</strong> Proclus on the Republic contains some<br />

passages <strong>of</strong> great interest to the historian <strong>of</strong> <strong>mathematics</strong>.<br />

The most important is that 3 in which Proclus indicates that<br />

Props. 9, 10 <strong>of</strong> Euclid, Book II, are Pythagorean propositions<br />

invented for the purpose <strong>of</strong> proving geometrically the<br />

fundamental property <strong>of</strong> the series <strong>of</strong> ' side-' and ' diameter-'<br />

numbers, giving successive approximations to the value <strong>of</strong><br />

\/2 (see vol. i, p. 93). The explanation 4 <strong>of</strong> the passage in<br />

Plato about the Geometrical Number is defective and disappointing,<br />

but it contains an interesting reference to one<br />

Paterius, <strong>of</strong> date presumably intermediate between Nestorius<br />

and Proclus. Paterius is said to have made a calculation, in<br />

units and submultiples, <strong>of</strong> the lengths <strong>of</strong> different segments <strong>of</strong><br />

1<br />

2<br />

Proclus, Hypotyposis, c. 4, pp. 120-22.<br />

lb., c. 3, pp. 76, 17 sq.<br />

3<br />

Prodi Diadochi in Platonis Rempublicam Commentarii, ed. Kroil,<br />

vol. ii, p. 27.<br />

4 lb., vol. ii, pp. 36-42.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!