31.10.2014 Views

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

252 TRIGONOMETRY<br />

We may contrast with this proposition <strong>of</strong> Theodosius the<br />

corresponding proposition in Menelaus's Sphaerica (III. 15)<br />

dealing with the more general case in which C", instead <strong>of</strong><br />

being the tropical point on the ecliptic, is, like B' , any point<br />

between the tropical point and D. If R, p have the same<br />

meaning as above and r x<br />

, r 2<br />

are the radii <strong>of</strong> the parallel circles<br />

through B' and the new C\ Menelaus proves that<br />

sina<br />

sin a'<br />

Rp<br />

r Y<br />

r 2<br />

'<br />

which, <strong>of</strong> course, with the aid <strong>of</strong> Tables, gives the means<br />

<strong>of</strong> finding the actual values <strong>of</strong> a or a! when the other elements<br />

are given.<br />

The proposition III. 12 <strong>of</strong> Theodosius proves a result similar<br />

to that <strong>of</strong> III. 11 for the case where the great circles AB'B,<br />

AC'C, instead <strong>of</strong> being great circles through the poles, are<br />

great circles touching ' the circle <strong>of</strong> the always-visible stars ',<br />

i.e. different positions <strong>of</strong> the horizon, and the points C", B f<br />

are<br />

any points on the arc <strong>of</strong> the oblique circle between the tropical<br />

and the equinoctial points ; in this case, with the same notation,<br />

4E : 2 p > (arc BG) : (arc B'C).<br />

It is evident that Theodosius was simply a laborious compiler,<br />

and that there was practically nothing original in his<br />

work. It has been proved, by means <strong>of</strong> propositions quoted<br />

verbatim or assumed as known by Autolycus in his Moving<br />

Sphere and by Euclid in his Phaenomena, that the following<br />

propositions in Theodosius are pre-Euclidean, I. 1, 6 a, 7, 8, 11,<br />

12, 13, 15, 20 ;<br />

II. 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 9, 10 a, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22;<br />

III. lb, 2, 3, 7, 8. those shown in thick type being quoted<br />

word for word.<br />

The beginnings <strong>of</strong> trigonometry.<br />

But this is not all. In Menelaus's Spliaerica, III. 15, there<br />

is a reference to the proposition (III. 11) <strong>of</strong> Theodosius proved<br />

above, and in Gherard <strong>of</strong> Cremona's translation from the<br />

Arabic, as well as in Halley's translation from the Hebrew<br />

<strong>of</strong> Jacob b. Machir, there is<br />

an addition to the effect that this<br />

proposition was used by Apollonius in a book the title <strong>of</strong><br />

which is given in the two translations in the alternative

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!