31.10.2014 Views

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THEON OF ALEXANDRIA 527<br />

pp. 58-63). Of the historical notices we may mention the<br />

following. (1) Theon mentions the treatise <strong>of</strong> Menelaus On<br />

Chords in a Circle, i. e. Menelaus's Table <strong>of</strong> Chords, which came<br />

between the similar Tables <strong>of</strong> Hipparchus and Ptolemy. (2) A<br />

quotation from Diophantus furnishes incidentally a lower limit<br />

for the date <strong>of</strong> the Arithmetica. (3) It is in the commentary<br />

on Ptolemy that Theon tells us that the second part <strong>of</strong> Euclid<br />

VI. 33 relating to sectors in equal circles was inserted by himself<br />

in his edition <strong>of</strong> the Elements, a notice which is <strong>of</strong> capital<br />

importance in that it enables the Theonine manuscripts <strong>of</strong><br />

Euclid to be distinguished from the ante-Theonine, and is<br />

therefore the key to the question how far the genuine text<br />

<strong>of</strong> Euclid was altered in Theon's edition. (4) As we have<br />

207 sq.), Theon, a propos <strong>of</strong> an allusion <strong>of</strong> Ptolemy<br />

seen (pp.<br />

to the theory <strong>of</strong> isoperimetric figures, has preserved for us<br />

several propositions from the treatise by Zenodorus on that<br />

subject.<br />

Theon's edition <strong>of</strong> Euclid's Elements.<br />

We are able to judge <strong>of</strong> the character <strong>of</strong> Theon's edition <strong>of</strong><br />

Euclid by a comparison between the Theonine manuscripts<br />

and the famous Vatican MS. 190, which contains an earlier<br />

edition than Theon's, together with certain fragments <strong>of</strong><br />

ancient papyri. It appears that, while Theon took some<br />

trouble to follow older manuscripts, it was not so much his<br />

object to get the most authoritative text as to make what he<br />

considered improvements <strong>of</strong> one sort or other, (l) He made<br />

alterations where he found, or thought he found, mistakes in<br />

the original; while he tried to remove some real blots, he<br />

altered other passages too hastily when a little more consideration<br />

would have shown that Euclid's words are right or could<br />

be excused, and <strong>of</strong>fer no difficulty to an intelligent reader.<br />

(2) He made emendations intended to improve the form or<br />

diction <strong>of</strong> Euclid ;<br />

in general they were prompted by a desire<br />

to eliminate anything which was out <strong>of</strong> the common in expression<br />

or in form, in order to reduce the language to one and the<br />

same standard or norm. (3) He bestowed, however, most<br />

attention upon additions designed to supplement or explain<br />

the original ;<br />

(a) he interpolated whole propositions where he<br />

thought them necessary or useful, e.g. the addition to VI. 33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!