31.10.2014 Views

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE CONICS 133<br />

may intersect, touch, or both) the part which is claimed<br />

as new is the extension to the intersections <strong>of</strong> the parabola,<br />

with the double-branch hyperbola, and <strong>of</strong><br />

ellipse, and circle<br />

two double-branch hyperbolas with one another, <strong>of</strong> the investigations<br />

which had theret<strong>of</strong>ore only taken account <strong>of</strong> the<br />

single-branch hyperbola. Even in Book V, the most remarkable<br />

<strong>of</strong> all, Apollonius does not say that normals as the shortest<br />

'<br />

lines ' had not been considered before, but only that they had<br />

been superficially touched upon, doubtless in connexion with<br />

propositions dealing with the tangent properties. He explains<br />

that he found it convenient to treat <strong>of</strong> the tangent properties,<br />

without any reference to normals, in the first Book in order<br />

to connect them with the chord properties.<br />

It is clear, therefore,<br />

that in treating normals as maxima and minima, and by<br />

themselves, without any reference to tangents, as he does in<br />

Book V, he was making an innovation ; and, in view <strong>of</strong> the<br />

extent to which the theory <strong>of</strong> normals as maxima and minima<br />

is developed by him (in 77 propositions), there is no wonder<br />

that he should devote a whole Book to the subject. Apart<br />

from the developments in Books III, IV, V, just mentioned,<br />

and the numerous new propositions in Book VII with the<br />

problems thereon which formed the lost Book VIII, Apollonius<br />

only claims to have treated the whole subject more fully and<br />

generally than his predecessors.<br />

Great generality <strong>of</strong> treatment from the beginning.<br />

So far from being a braggart and taking undue credit<br />

himself for the improvements which he made upon his predecessors,<br />

Apollonius is, if anything, too modest in his description<br />

<strong>of</strong> his personal contributions to the theory <strong>of</strong> conic<br />

sections. For the more fully and generally ' ' <strong>of</strong> his first<br />

preface scarcely conveys an idea <strong>of</strong> the extreme generality<br />

with which the whole subject is worked out.<br />

This characteristic<br />

generality appears at the very outset.<br />

to<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Conies.<br />

Book I.<br />

Apollonius begins by describing a double oblique circular<br />

cone in the most general way. Given a circle and any point<br />

outside the plane <strong>of</strong> the circle and in general not lying on the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!