31.10.2014 Views

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

.<br />

GEOMETRY 311<br />

Of this class are the different cases <strong>of</strong> I. 35, 36, III. 7, 8<br />

(where the chords to be compared are drawn on different sides<br />

<strong>of</strong> the diameter instead <strong>of</strong> on the same side), III.<br />

12 (which is<br />

not Euclid's at all but Heron's own, adding the case <strong>of</strong><br />

external to that <strong>of</strong> internal contact in III. 11 \ VI. 19 (where<br />

the triangle in which an additional line is drawn is taken to<br />

be the smaller <strong>of</strong> the two), VII. 19 (where the particular case<br />

is given <strong>of</strong> three numbers in continued proportion instead <strong>of</strong><br />

four proportionals).<br />

(3) Alternative pro<strong>of</strong>s.<br />

It appears to be Heron who first introduced the easy but<br />

uninstructive semi-algebraical method <strong>of</strong> proving the propositions<br />

II. 2-10 which is now so popular. On this method the<br />

propositions are proved ' without figures ' as consequences <strong>of</strong><br />

II. 1 corresponding to the algebraical formula<br />

a (b + c + d + .<br />

.<br />

.)<br />

= ab + ac -f ad + .<br />

.<br />

Heron explains that it is not possible to prove II. 1 without<br />

drawing a number <strong>of</strong> lines (i. e. without actually drawing the<br />

rectangles), but that the following propositions up to II. 10<br />

can be proved by merely drawing one line. He distinguishes<br />

two varieties <strong>of</strong> the method, one by dissolutio, the other by<br />

compositio, by which he seems to mean splitting-up <strong>of</strong> rectangles<br />

and squares and combination <strong>of</strong> them into others.<br />

But in his pro<strong>of</strong>s he sometimes combines the two varieties.<br />

Alternative pro<strong>of</strong>s are given (a) <strong>of</strong> some propositions <strong>of</strong><br />

Book III, namely III. 25 (placed after III. 30 and starting<br />

from the arc instead <strong>of</strong> the chord), III. 10 (proved by means<br />

<strong>of</strong> III. 9), III. 13 (a pro<strong>of</strong> preceded by a lemma to the effect<br />

that a straight line cannot meet a circle in more than two<br />

points).<br />

A class <strong>of</strong> alternative pro<strong>of</strong> is (6) that which is intended to<br />

meet a particular objection (eWracriy) which had been or might<br />

be raised to Euclid's constructions. Thus in certain cases<br />

Heron avoids producing a certain straight line, where Euclid<br />

produces it, the object being to meet the objection <strong>of</strong> one who<br />

should deny our right to assume that there is any space<br />

available. Of this class are his pro<strong>of</strong>s <strong>of</strong> I. 11, 20 and his<br />

note on I. 16. Similarly in I. 48 he supposes the right-angled

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!