31.10.2014 Views

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

300 HERON OF ALEXANDRIA<br />

Pappus goes on to say that he will give four solutions, one<br />

<strong>of</strong> which is his own ; the first, second, and third he describes<br />

as those <strong>of</strong> Eratosthenes, Nicomedes and Heron. But in the<br />

earlier sentence he mentions Philon along with Heron, and we<br />

know from Eutocius that Heron's solution is practically the<br />

same as Philon's. Hence we may conclude that by the third<br />

solution Pappus really meant Philon's, and that he only mentioned<br />

Heron's Mechanics because it was a convenient place in<br />

which to find the same solution.<br />

Another argument has been based on the fact that the<br />

extracts from Heron's Mechanics given at the end <strong>of</strong> Pappus's<br />

Book VIII, as we have it, are introduced by the author with<br />

a complaint that the copies <strong>of</strong> Heron's works in which he<br />

found them were in many respects corrupt, having lost both<br />

beginning and end. 1 But the extracts appear to have been<br />

added, not by Pappus, but by some later writer, and the<br />

argument accordingly falls to the ground.<br />

The limits <strong>of</strong> date being then, say, 150 B.C. to A. D* 250, our<br />

only course is to try to define, as well as possible, the relation<br />

in time between Heron and the other mathematicians who<br />

come, roughly, within the same limits.<br />

This method has led<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the most recent writers on the subject (Tittel 2 ) to<br />

place Heron not much later than 100 B.C., while another, 3<br />

relying almost entirely on a comparison between passages in<br />

Ptolemy and Heron, arrives at the very different conclusion<br />

that Heron was later than Ptolemy and belonged in fact to<br />

the second century a.d.<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> the difference between these results, it will be<br />

convenient to summarize the evidence relied on to<br />

establish<br />

the earlier date, and to consider how far it is or is not conclusive<br />

against the later. We begin with the relation <strong>of</strong><br />

Heron to Philon. Philon is supposed to come not more than<br />

a generation later than Ctesibius, because it would appear that<br />

machines for throwing projectiles constructed by Ctesibius<br />

and Philon respectively were both available at one time for<br />

inspection by experts on the subject 4 ;<br />

it is inferred that<br />

1<br />

Pappus, viii, p. 1116. 4-7.<br />

2 Art. ' Heron von Alexandreia' in Pauly-Wissowa's Real-Encyclopddie<br />

dei class. Altertumstvissenschaft, vol. 8. 1, 1912.<br />

3<br />

4<br />

I. Hammer-Jensen in Hermes, vol. 48, 1913, pp. 224-35.<br />

Philon, Mech. Spit, iv, pp. 68. 1, 72. 36.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!