31.10.2014 Views

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

:<br />

PROCLUS. MARINUS 537<br />

straight lines in a figure formed by taking a triangle with<br />

sides 3, 4, 5 as ABG, then drawing<br />

BD from the right angle B perpendicular<br />

to AG, and lastly drawingperpendiculars<br />

BE, BF to AB, BC.<br />

A diagram in the text with the<br />

lengths <strong>of</strong> the segments shown alongside<br />

them in the usual numerical<br />

notation shows that Paterius obtained from the data AB = 3,<br />

BG = 4, CA = 5 the following<br />

£Z) = |S/ lf'=2^ [=2|]<br />

42>=«S«V = lHA [=lf]<br />

w = /3 s *y = 2f<br />

j i T 5 [=2|f]<br />

^ = .^^=11^* [=i«]<br />

BE=aSy' »? v' = 1H A A [<br />

= Iff]<br />

This is an example <strong>of</strong> the Egyptian method <strong>of</strong> stating fractions<br />

preceding by some three or four centuries the exposition<br />

<strong>of</strong> the same method in the papyrus <strong>of</strong> Akhmim.<br />

Marinus <strong>of</strong> Neapolis, the pupil and biographer <strong>of</strong> Proclus,<br />

wrote a commentary or rather introduction to the Data <strong>of</strong><br />

Euclid. 1 It is mainly taken up with a discussion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

question ri to deSo/ievov, what is meant by given 1 There<br />

were apparently many different definitions <strong>of</strong> the term given<br />

by earlier and later authorities. Of those who tried to define<br />

it<br />

in the simplest way by means <strong>of</strong> a single differentia, three<br />

are mentioned by name. Apollonius in his work on vevaei?<br />

and his ' general treatise ' (presumably that on elementary<br />

geometry) described the given as assigned or fixed (reTay-<br />

\xkvov), Diodorus called it kno%vn (yvdopifiov); others regarded<br />

it as rational {p-qrov) and Ptolemy is classed with these, rather<br />

oddly, because ' he called those things given the measure <strong>of</strong><br />

which is given either exactly or approximately'. Others<br />

1<br />

See Heiberg and Menge's Euclid, vol. vi, pp. 234-56.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!