31.10.2014 Views

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

A history of Greek mathematics - Wilbourhall.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

;<br />

CONTROVERSIES AS TO HERON'S DATE 303<br />

machines used by the two for the same purpose frequently<br />

differ in details ; e. g. in Vitru vius's hodometer a pebble drops<br />

into a box at the end <strong>of</strong> each Roman mile. 1<br />

the distance completed is marked by a pointer. 2<br />

while in Heron's<br />

It is indeed<br />

pointed out that the water-<strong>org</strong>an <strong>of</strong> Heron is in many respects<br />

more primitive than that <strong>of</strong> Vitruvius ; but, as the instruments<br />

are altogether different, this can scarcely be said to<br />

prove anything.<br />

On the other hand, there are points <strong>of</strong> contact between<br />

certain propositions <strong>of</strong> Heron and <strong>of</strong> the Roman agrimensores.<br />

Columella, about a.d. 62, gave certain measurements <strong>of</strong><br />

plane figures which agree with the formulae used by Heron,<br />

notably those for the equilateral triangle, the regular hexagon<br />

(in this case not only the formula but the actual figures agree<br />

with Heron's) and the segment <strong>of</strong> a circle which is<br />

a semicircle, the formula in the last case being<br />

less than<br />

where s is the chord and h the height <strong>of</strong> the segment.<br />

Here<br />

there might seem to be dependence, one way or the other<br />

but the possibility is not excluded that the two writers may<br />

merely have drawn from a common source ; for Heron, in<br />

giving the formula for the area <strong>of</strong> the segment <strong>of</strong> a circle,<br />

states that it was the formula used by ' the more accurate<br />

investigators' (ol ccKpL^icrrepou e ^77777 /core?). 3<br />

We have, lastly, to consider the relation between Ptolemy<br />

and Heron. If Heron lived about 100 B.C., he was 200 years<br />

earlier than Ptolemy (a.d. 100—178). The argument used to<br />

prove that Ptolemy came some time after Heron is based on<br />

a passage <strong>of</strong> Proclus where Ptolemy is said to have remarked<br />

on the untrustworthiness <strong>of</strong> the method in vogue among the<br />

'<br />

more ancient ' writers <strong>of</strong> measuring the apparent diameter <strong>of</strong><br />

the sun by means <strong>of</strong> water-clocks. 4 Hipparchus, says Proclus,<br />

used his dioptra for the purpose, and Ptolemy followed<br />

him. Proclus proceeds :<br />

'<br />

Let us then set out here not only the observations <strong>of</strong><br />

the ancients but also the construction <strong>of</strong> the dioptra <strong>of</strong><br />

Vitruvius, x. 14.<br />

2<br />

Heron, Dioptra, c. 34.<br />

1<br />

3<br />

Heron, Metrica, i. 31, p. 74. 21.<br />

4<br />

Proclus, Hypotyposis, pp. 120. 9-15, 124. 7-26.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!