20.11.2014 Views

d59KNYm

d59KNYm

d59KNYm

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

180 SNAKES IN SUITS<br />

them when common courtesy demands otherwise, and failing to<br />

build relationships based on mutual trust and respect might actually<br />

reflect a boss low on consideration, rather than a true psychopath.<br />

Initiating structure, the second supervisory factor, means that a<br />

leader is expected to decide on the work goals and tasks to be completed,<br />

flesh out the roles of the team members, and delineate the<br />

standards of performance or key success measures—in essence, to<br />

“lead.” Bosses high in this factor take an active part in determining<br />

what needs to be done and how to do it. Traditional boss roles, such<br />

as planning, organizing, communicating, setting expectations, and<br />

defining the “big picture” fit in the high end of this factor. Bosses<br />

low in initiating structure tend not to be involved in the work at<br />

hand. A boss who dominates or who issues orders every step of the<br />

way may just be too high on initiating structure and not a true psychopath.<br />

Conversely, if the boss is rarely involved or even interested<br />

in the work you do, he or she may be very low in this factor—a “laissez<br />

faire leader”—or may not be a leader at all. Low structuring is not<br />

necessarily an indication of psychopathy either, although you may<br />

feel personally slighted and possibly angry.<br />

Most people want a boss who is considerate and trusting and<br />

who builds rapport. Whether we also want our bosses to be high or<br />

low on initiating structure depends on whether we want someone to<br />

tell us what our job is and how to do it (most appropriate for new<br />

jobs or untrained employees), or we prefer to do our job with little<br />

interference from the boss (most preferred by seasoned workers).<br />

Both are equally valid styles as long as there is a match between employees’<br />

needs and the boss’s approach to management.<br />

While this two-factor model of leader behavior is well founded<br />

and makes intuitive sense when describing observed supervisory behavior,<br />

subsequent research on leadership has shown that these two<br />

variables alone (that is, how much consideration and structuring<br />

make up the boss’s style) are not enough to predict who will be<br />

an effective leader. Whether a boss is high or low in these factors is<br />

not related to how effective a supervisor will be; the boss-employee

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!