20.11.2014 Views

d59KNYm

d59KNYm

d59KNYm

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Enemy at the Gates<br />

229<br />

do not decide alone<br />

A well-structured hiring process will include a meeting of<br />

interviewers—a selection committee—to discuss the qualifications<br />

and relative merits of the candidates. This is good practice because<br />

different interviewers see different strengths and weaknesses in any<br />

single candidate, and these should be compared and discussed. It is<br />

invaluable in the case of screening out a potential psychopath. Recall<br />

that psychopaths attempt to build private one-on-one relationships<br />

with those who have utility to them. By definition, this would<br />

include all interviewers and decision makers involved in the hiring<br />

process.<br />

As informal students of human psychology, psychopaths may<br />

easily ascertain the specific psychological needs and wants of each interviewer<br />

and then customize their approach to best advantage. On<br />

the surface, each interviewer will come away with a positive impression,<br />

and, to the degree that decision making relies on this good feeling,<br />

they will all agree that the psychopath is the ideal candidate,<br />

almost too good to be true.<br />

By increasing the number and varying the types of interviewers<br />

beyond the human resource professional and hiring manager, the<br />

chances of finding discrepancies that lie behind the “ideal employee”<br />

façade increase. Expanding the interview schedule with a<br />

technical expert, a future peer or subordinate, the current job holder<br />

(if still on staff), a member of upper management, and even the department<br />

staff assistant can provide different perspectives that<br />

might uncover important information. We also know that psychopaths<br />

treat individuals differently depending on their perceived<br />

status. Psychopathic responses to perceived “lower-status” interviewers<br />

may include condescension, flirting, disparaging side comments,<br />

and displays of entitlement, among other things. “High-status” interviewers<br />

may provoke discussion of overly ambitious career aspirations<br />

and expectations, bravado and deceitful boasting, and even the<br />

disparagement of another “lower-status” interviewer. By getting all

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!