monitoring
monitoring
monitoring
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
UNCLASSIFIED<br />
DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE<br />
for these systems relies on external cueing that radiation sources could be expected in the<br />
immediate vicinity of operations. The next generation of radiation detection systems for this<br />
application may include large‐array gamma and neutron detectors, passive neutron and gamma<br />
ray spectral imagers, and possibly active neutron and photon (bremsstrahlung) interrogation<br />
sources. If successfully developed and deployed––and the Task Force cautions that much work<br />
will be needed to do so––such active systems could extend the useable detection range out to<br />
~100 meters depending on the quantities of SNM and associated shielding of the objects in<br />
question.<br />
Finding Loose Nukes or Identifying Theater Nuclear Weapons. These continue to be the most<br />
challenging problems for detection and identification of SNM sources. As noted elsewhere in<br />
this report, radiation detection by itself will play a limited part in the solution to these<br />
challenges. A networked search and discovery architecture that includes non‐radiation sensors<br />
along with near‐real‐time data and information fusion and dissemination will need to be<br />
developed. Radiation sensors would be engaged only during the end game when a likely<br />
location for a hidden weapon or SNM has been identified. At that point, radiation sensors<br />
would be used to identify and characterize the source before interdiction by personnel or<br />
destruction by kinetic munitions.<br />
Longer Range Detection. Active interrogation for stand‐off detection using high energy<br />
photons to stimulate fission has demonstrated detection of delayed neutrons. Interrogation<br />
distances up to 100m have been demonstrated, but detection distances have been limited to<br />
tens of meters. Long range (100m to kilometers) stand‐off radiation detection and identification<br />
of SNM must await future breakthroughs. There is little chance of a deployed technical solution<br />
in the next 10 years.<br />
5.3.4. Agency Responsibilities and Inter‐Agency Coordination<br />
The agencies with principal responsibilities for technical development as well as operational<br />
deployment of radiation detection systems are the Departments of Defense, Energy, and<br />
Homeland Security. The DoD must protect its bases and other sites, be prepared for detecting<br />
radiation sources in hostile environments, carry out on‐site inspections and (ideally) detect<br />
SNM from standoff distances (> 100 m). The DOE has a myriad of different programs that<br />
involve radiation detection including non‐proliferation, <strong>monitoring</strong> of material in the nuclear<br />
fuel cycle, operations at international borders and ports, and searches for suspected loose<br />
material or weapons. The DHS has the lead role in U.S.‐based operations including borders and<br />
ports and for activities in public U.S. environments. There is a four‐part MOU among those<br />
three agencies plus the DNI for coordination of nuclear detection R&D, and an interagency<br />
working group (IWG) led by the President’s OSTP. These mechanisms help provide substantial<br />
information exchange and communication among the workers in the field and has been<br />
successful in avoiding unnecessary duplication of effort, but the diversity of technical and<br />
operational needs makes it difficult to set (or infer) overall research and development priorities.<br />
Novel concepts and new materials are continually being proposed and should be evaluated<br />
DSB TASK FORCE REPORT Chapter 5: Improve the Tools: Access, Sense, Assess | 56<br />
Nuclear Treaty Monitoring Verification Technologies<br />
UNCLASSIFIED