29.12.2014 Views

Social Impact Assessment of Microfinance Programmes - weman

Social Impact Assessment of Microfinance Programmes - weman

Social Impact Assessment of Microfinance Programmes - weman

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The other results that are significant are for empowerment. In the double difference<br />

estimation, economic empowerment is significant (3.85 pts; p=0.02) while in single<br />

difference, social empowerment is significant (1.38 pts.; p=0.09). In the regressions on<br />

overall, economic and income empowerment, the loan cycle dummy was significant<br />

implying that clients who have borrowed twice are more empowered than first time<br />

borrowers. Even though the percentage <strong>of</strong> female respondents in the active borrower<br />

category was 47 percent, and in the other categories collectively it was 13 percent, we<br />

still do not find a significant impact on most empowerment indices. In the pipeline<br />

respondent category, the percentage <strong>of</strong> females was 17 percent as Akhuwat is phasing out<br />

its group lending, which only caters to women, and is moving towards individual lending.<br />

The other variable that came out significant in the regressions was the member dummy<br />

for asset score (-0.99, p=0.029), implying that the individuals who self-select themselves<br />

own fewer assets than their neighbours. This is understandable as building assets takes<br />

time and to begin with maybe these individuals are poorer and that is why they have been<br />

accepted by Akhuwat as clients. However, the loan cycle dummy for asset score is<br />

positive and significant (0.88, p=0.03) implying that over time, the borrowers do end up<br />

building assets, which are important to reduce vulnerability.<br />

Table 5.8: Regression Results<br />

Single Difference Double Difference<br />

Dependent Variable Coefficient t-value 1 Coefficient t-value<br />

Log(Respondent Income) 0.12 1.35 0.1 0.98<br />

Log(Household Income) 0.13 2.00 ** 0.17 1.80 *<br />

Log(Per Capita Income) 0.12 1.73 * 0.16 1.56<br />

Log(Total Household Expenditure) 0.05 0.95 0.03 0.42<br />

Log(Food Expenditure) 0.06 0.95 0.16 1.75 *<br />

Educational Expenditure 133 0.98 330 1.54<br />

Health Expenditure -17.5 -0.28 135 1.23<br />

Savings 7.8 0.05 -236 -0.85<br />

Asset Score 0.49 1.23 0.44 0.73<br />

Children Enrolled in School(%) -0.62 -0.08 10.4 0.90<br />

Boys Enrolled in School(%) -0.72 -0.09 20.8 1.47<br />

Girls Enrolled in School(%) 3.2 0.43 9.2 0.84<br />

Women's Empowerment (Overall Ind 2.86 0.78 4.07 0.81<br />

Economic Empowerment 1.13 0.9 3.85 2.36 **<br />

Income Empowerment -0.32 -0.68 -1.27 -1.61<br />

Asset Empowerment -0.55 -0.69 -1.55 -1.59<br />

Empowerment related with<br />

Education and Health 1.22 1.06 1.66 0.84<br />

<strong>Social</strong> Empowerment 1.38 1.72 * 1.37 0.89<br />

1 Significant at 10%(*), Significant at 5%(**), Significant at 1% (***)<br />

2 Score based on 47 questions, the other idices listed below are a breakdown <strong>of</strong> this index. Refer to<br />

questionnaire for detail.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!