29.12.2014 Views

Social Impact Assessment of Microfinance Programmes - weman

Social Impact Assessment of Microfinance Programmes - weman

Social Impact Assessment of Microfinance Programmes - weman

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eflections. External evaluations and research studies are also commissioned; however,<br />

the frequency and scope needs to expand significantly.<br />

6.1.8.5 Systemic Planning and Future Directions<br />

SAFWCO has a long range <strong>of</strong> plans for its operational, institutional and programmatic<br />

expansion. While more specific plans will emanate from the five year strategic planning<br />

that has recently been initiated, broad directions have been shared. With respect to assets<br />

and operational sustainability, SAFWCO has acquired its three branch <strong>of</strong>fices, hence has<br />

reduced the expenses for rents. It has also procured a land parcel <strong>of</strong> 16 acres for its<br />

DHARTI project i.e. Development <strong>of</strong> Human Action Research and Training Institute.<br />

The recently established Human and Institutional Development Centre is also procured<br />

from SAFWCO’s own savings <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3.2 million which is now generating its own<br />

operational costs through consultancies and outsourcing services.<br />

Geographically, SAFWCO has expanded its operation to Achroo Thar district which is a<br />

very marginalized and highly ignored area with extinct facilities or infrastructure.<br />

Similarly, it plans to start its operation in very disadvantaged communities <strong>of</strong> Jamshoro<br />

and Kohistan areas <strong>of</strong> Sindh.<br />

6.2 Survey Results<br />

In this section we present the results from our survey for SAFWCO. The results are based<br />

on the data collected on the basis <strong>of</strong> the questionnaire – see Appendix at the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Report. A select few <strong>of</strong> the results are presented here in table form, in the main text <strong>of</strong><br />

this Chapter, while the substantial majority <strong>of</strong> tables are presented in the Appendix to the<br />

Chapter. The Appendix to this Chapter contains the largely ‘descriptive’ tables and<br />

results, while the tables which are part <strong>of</strong> the text in this Chapter, are the more<br />

‘analytical’ tables. In the Appendix to this Chapter, there are far more tables than those<br />

on which we <strong>of</strong>fer comments in the text. Many <strong>of</strong> these tables are simply informative and<br />

so we do not discuss them in the Chapter. They are being provided for the reader’s own<br />

interest and perusal. Only the more interesting, striking or pertinent results and tables<br />

from the Appendix are discussed in the text.<br />

As we show in Chapter 2, the survey was conducted across four types <strong>of</strong> populations for<br />

the purposes <strong>of</strong> the Study. Two <strong>of</strong> the categories are ‘clients’ or ‘borrowers’, while the<br />

other two are ‘non-clients’. In the borrower/client category, there are two types <strong>of</strong> clients,<br />

the ‘Active Borrowers’ and the ‘Pipeline Borrowers’. The former category that <strong>of</strong> ‘Active<br />

Borrower’, is that client who has been in the programme <strong>of</strong> the MFI for longer than ten<br />

months; s/he may have been a client for some years in their nth loan cycle or may have<br />

even been a client in their first year. ‘Pipeline Borrowers’ are classified as those new<br />

clients who had joined the programme <strong>of</strong> the MFI a few months – usually between 1-4<br />

months – <strong>of</strong> the start <strong>of</strong> our survey. There are also two categories <strong>of</strong> ‘Non-Borrowers’,<br />

one which are selected from the neighbourhood <strong>of</strong> the old Active Borrowers, and the<br />

other from the neighbourhood <strong>of</strong> Pipeline Borrowers. Ideally, and in the best case<br />

possible, the Active Borrower and the Pipeline Borrower (and their neighbours) should<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!