29.12.2014 Views

Social Impact Assessment of Microfinance Programmes - weman

Social Impact Assessment of Microfinance Programmes - weman

Social Impact Assessment of Microfinance Programmes - weman

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Loan for Livestock: OCT also supports livestock farming and diary business<br />

especially through its partner NGOs. A total loan <strong>of</strong> Rs. 14,381,603 has been<br />

disbursed to 1,709 units.<br />

Loan Types as % <strong>of</strong> Total Portfolio<br />

Thalla, 0.53<br />

Clinic, 0.88<br />

Services , 11<br />

livestock, 3.2<br />

School, 4.8<br />

Manufacturing ,<br />

17.5<br />

Trading, 34.7<br />

Farming &<br />

Fisherfolk, 27.4<br />

Manufacturing Farming & Fisherfolk Trading Services School livestock Clinic Thalla<br />

Figure 4.2<br />

4.1.5 Lending Methodology and Selection Criteria<br />

As mentioned in previous sections, OCT only provides loan to individuals primarily<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the culture <strong>of</strong> Orangi town and also because group repayments have higher<br />

rates <strong>of</strong> defaulting. Reaching this procedure and clarity, however, was no mean feat. It<br />

took almost 16 years <strong>of</strong> experience and lessons-learnt by implementing its microcredit<br />

programme, that OCT finally settled on its current strategy. In the beginning, loans were<br />

given to individual entrepreneurs selected and supervised by OCT managers. This was<br />

effective only till the number <strong>of</strong> borrowers were limited. Supervision and tracking<br />

became a logistic and financial nightmare as OCT’s clients grew in number and spread<br />

geographically. A simplistic solution was applied and numbers <strong>of</strong> supervisors were<br />

increased. This however posed a challenge <strong>of</strong> judicious use <strong>of</strong> discretionary powers.<br />

During 1991-94, OCT was faced with a difficult scenario where its managers were giving<br />

out loans in great numbers across Karachi city. In 1996, the system nearly collapsed with<br />

sky-rocketing defaulters and umpteen cases <strong>of</strong> misuse <strong>of</strong> discretion. For saving the<br />

programme, the number <strong>of</strong> borrowers and staff was curtailed extensively. The evolution<br />

<strong>of</strong> loan management system went through four distinct faces that are outlined below:<br />

4.1.5.1 Phase 1: Loans through <strong>Social</strong> Organizers/Supervisors<br />

Supervisors recommended loan application upon a quick visit to the borrower’ enterprise<br />

whereas the final decision was made by the Director and Joint Director when two to three<br />

applications were received. In reality, loans were approved solely on supervisor’s<br />

recommendation. Account keeping was also manual.<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!