30.12.2014 Views

document title / titre du document TRP W ORK PLAN ... - emits - ESA

document title / titre du document TRP W ORK PLAN ... - emits - ESA

document title / titre du document TRP W ORK PLAN ... - emits - ESA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>TRP</strong> Work Plan 2005-2007<br />

Description of Activities<br />

TEC-SB/7935/dc<br />

12/Feb/09<br />

<strong>TRP</strong> Reference:<br />

T605-12MC<br />

Improvement of force limited vibration testing methods for equipment/instrument unit<br />

Title:<br />

mechanical verification<br />

The mechanical vibration testing approaches (sine and random) currently applied to satellite equipment / instrument units are<br />

in general very conservative and might result to severe over-testing of the units compared to real flight environments. The<br />

reasons for this are the different interface conditions applicable to the system and the test configuration (when the unit is<br />

hard-mounted to the shaker table). Consequently these test approaches lead also to over-design of the units and therefore<br />

significant mass penalties. Force limited vibration testing has been intensively investigated in NASA since many years. The<br />

methods aim at establishing interface force estimates for the case when the unit is mounted on a flexible satellite support<br />

structure rather than the shaker and to limit the test input for the unit test to these force estimates. The experiences in force<br />

limited vibration testing are still very limited in Europe. Further investigations of this subject should increase the relevant<br />

knowledge base and should contribute to the establishment of an <strong>ESA</strong> mechanical testing handbook covering the specific<br />

aspects of force limited vibration testing. The objectives are to investigate the influence of the support structure mechanical<br />

impedance on the random vibration environment and the execution of unit random vibration test on electro-dynamic shakers;<br />

to identify relevant methods to more accurately derive the interface force limits (e.g. direct measurement at system level,<br />

semi-empirical, analytical) and to assess their respective accuracy; to develop simplified but nevertheless adequate models<br />

for the simulation of coupled system conditions; to verify the developed approaches by analytical and experimental means<br />

(representative of existing equipment structures) and to establish the relevant input for the <strong>ESA</strong> Mechanical Testing<br />

Handbook.<br />

Deliverables:<br />

Technical notes (incl. identification of methods to more accurately derive the interface force limits, models for the simulation of<br />

coupled system conditions, verification of the developed approaches by analytical and experimental means).<br />

Current TRL:<br />

Target TRL:<br />

Application Need/Date: TRL5 (operational method)<br />

TRL2<br />

TRL3<br />

by 2008<br />

Application/Mission: Engineering toolsapplicable to all S/C Contract Duration: 18 months<br />

SW Clause : - Dossier0 Ref.: T-562<br />

Consistency with Harmonisation<br />

Roadmap and Conclusions:<br />

<strong>TRP</strong> Reference:<br />

Title:<br />

T605-20MC<br />

Advancement of Mechanical Verification Methods for non-linear spacecraft structures<br />

For the purpose of spacecraft structure design development and verification by analysis the structures are in general a-priori<br />

assumed to behave linear. Analytical predictions include static & dynamic analyses at satellite level but also launcher/satellite<br />

coupled dynamic loads analyses (CLA) to predict flight loads for specific satellite configurations. However, experience has<br />

shown that spacecraft structures can exhibit highly non-linear behaviour (e.g. <strong>du</strong>e to backlash, joint gapping, rattling) and the<br />

consequences of their dynamic effects can significantly affect the design verification proce<strong>du</strong>res, in particular: to properly<br />

evaluate flights loads with linearised models used in the CLA; the general performance of dynamic verification tests; to<br />

demonstrate adequate coverage of non-linear dynamic effects in satellite verification tests. As a result, the presence of such<br />

effects in spacecraft structures increases significantly the complexity of the mechanical verification process (analysis and<br />

testing).The main objectives of this activity are: to review satellite design and verification test <strong>document</strong>ation in order to<br />

identify relevant structure verification problems related to non-linear dynamic effects; to develop strategies for handling<br />

non-linear dynamic effects within linear CLA models and to adequately convert the related CLA predictions into dynamic<br />

verification test specifications; to analytically investigate the impact of spacecraft structure non-linearities on the verification<br />

test performance (including non-linear dynamic effects resulting from e.g. shaker); to verify the proposed approaches with a<br />

bread-board model (using available space hardware as far as possible); and to finally establish guidelines and<br />

recommendations for the identification of potential structural non-linearities, the assessment of their effects and how to treat<br />

them <strong>du</strong>ring the spacecraft structure design and development and the verification test phase.<br />

Deliverables:<br />

Documentation and breadboard.<br />

Current TRL: TRL2 Target TRL: TRL3-4 Application Need/Date: TRL5 by 2010<br />

Application/Mission: Engineering tools applicable to all S/C Contract Duration: 20 months<br />

SW Clause : - Dossier0 Ref.: T-543<br />

Consistency with Harmonisation<br />

Roadmap and Conclusions:<br />

Not directly linked to harmonised technology.<br />

Page 206 of 227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!