12.11.2012 Views

Examination of Firearms Review: 2007 to 2010 - Interpol

Examination of Firearms Review: 2007 to 2010 - Interpol

Examination of Firearms Review: 2007 to 2010 - Interpol

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

used in the RT reaction. The expression <strong>of</strong> miRNAs was subsequently examined<br />

using a SYBR Green real time PCR assay. Unfortunately this procedure cannot be<br />

multiplexed and has <strong>to</strong> be performed in a separate reaction for every miRNA 16 .<br />

Nonetheless attempts could be made <strong>to</strong> develop multiplex reactions using multiple<br />

dyes. Zubakov et al 15 in <strong>2010</strong> reported three miRNAs (miR-20a, miR-106a, and<br />

miR-185) that have high expression levels in circula<strong>to</strong>ry blood relative <strong>to</strong> semen,<br />

saliva and vaginal fluid. They used the TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription<br />

assay, which is species specific, however there are miRNAs which do appear in other<br />

species (e.g. non-human primates). Of the three miRNAs mentioned above only<br />

miR-106a is human specific.<br />

3.3 Semen<br />

3.3.1 Current confirma<strong>to</strong>ry techniques<br />

The tests that can be used for the identification <strong>of</strong> semen are the microscope test,<br />

immunological tests, and electrophoretic methods 2 .<br />

The microscope test can be used for the detection <strong>of</strong> semen. The microscopic<br />

detection <strong>of</strong> sperm cells gives a direct identification <strong>of</strong> semen. Another advantage <strong>of</strong><br />

the microscope test is the possibility <strong>to</strong> show the presence <strong>of</strong> semen in a mixture with<br />

blood and vaginal fluid. Unfortunately not all males have sperm cells in their<br />

ejaculate, meaning that the absence <strong>of</strong> sperm cells does not mean there is no<br />

semen. The absence <strong>of</strong> sperm cells can be explained by azoospermicity <strong>of</strong> the donor<br />

due <strong>to</strong> natural causes or by vasec<strong>to</strong>my. To be able <strong>to</strong> identify semen without sperm<br />

cells other techniques have been developed. An example is the use <strong>of</strong> prostate<br />

specific antigen (PSA), as mentioned in the introduction, for the identification <strong>of</strong><br />

semen. Semen <strong>of</strong> azoospermic males will still contain this protein which is present in<br />

the seminal plasma 6 . PSA can be detected in semen which is 10 6 times diluted 2 . Due<br />

<strong>to</strong> its extreme sensitivity other body fluids (e.g. breast milk and vaginal fluid) that also<br />

contain PSA but in much lower concentrations, can produce a false positive result. In<br />

addition PSA can give a false positive reaction on male urine 17 .<br />

Semen can also be detected using a lateral flow immunochroma<strong>to</strong>graphic strip test.<br />

This test is a part <strong>of</strong> the Rapid Stain Identification test (RSID TM ) and is developed <strong>to</strong><br />

detect the presence <strong>of</strong> semenogelin. The detection limit <strong>of</strong> this test is 2.5nL <strong>of</strong> human<br />

semen, and takes about 10 minutes <strong>to</strong> give a result. While it gives no positive result<br />

when tested on blood, saliva, vaginal fluid, and urine.<br />

3.3.2 Emerging and future techniques<br />

Like with blood, the newly developed techniques are aiming at identification and are<br />

species specific as well. Most <strong>of</strong> these new techniques deal with RNA. As mentioned<br />

before Alvarez et al 8 revealed a method <strong>to</strong> isolate RNA and DNA simultaneously from<br />

the same bloodstain extract. This method can also be applied <strong>to</strong> semen samples.<br />

Naturally the RT-PCR method described by Juusola and Ballantyne in 2005 also<br />

applies <strong>to</strong> semen. Juusola and Ballantyne 9 used the semen specific markers PRM1<br />

and protamine 2 (PRM2). Less than 200 pg <strong>of</strong> input RNA was needed for a positive<br />

result with both genes. The specificity <strong>of</strong> these genes for semen has been shown,<br />

because they were not detected in saliva, blood, menstrual blood, and vaginal fluid 9 .<br />

Accordingly Fleming and Harbison 11 mention that PRM1 and PRM2 have been found<br />

in ejaculated sperma<strong>to</strong>zoa and dried semen stains, while being absent in blood,<br />


 329


Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!