12.11.2012 Views

Examination of Firearms Review: 2007 to 2010 - Interpol

Examination of Firearms Review: 2007 to 2010 - Interpol

Examination of Firearms Review: 2007 to 2010 - Interpol

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The differentiation between systemic exposure and external contamination for<br />

certain drug groups has been frequently referred <strong>to</strong> as one <strong>of</strong> the limitations <strong>of</strong><br />

drug testing <strong>of</strong> hair. Difficulty in the interpretation arises when metabolites are<br />

not detected which may either be due <strong>to</strong> external contamination <strong>of</strong> the hair, or<br />

low doses <strong>of</strong> the drugs used, in particular when the drugs are administered by<br />

smoking, sniffing or inhalation. Hair samples <strong>of</strong> eight pre-Columbian mummies<br />

were analyzed for drugs using GC-MS. Nicotine was detected in 3 <strong>of</strong> the hair<br />

samples, with measured concentrations <strong>of</strong> 11.4-57.5 pg/mg, but all 3 cases<br />

revealed negative results for cotinine [444]. Thus, an active consumption <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>to</strong>bacco could not be confirmed based on the results <strong>of</strong> the analysis. The<br />

determination <strong>of</strong> the ratio <strong>of</strong> drug(s) in wash residue (W) <strong>to</strong> that in hair (H), i.e.,<br />

W/H ratio, is proposed <strong>to</strong> differentiate system exposure <strong>to</strong> external<br />

contamination [445]. When the W/H ratio is less than 0.1 or null, it would tend<br />

<strong>to</strong> indicate drug use. Where the W/H ratio is above 0.1 but less than 0.5, it is<br />

likely <strong>to</strong> indicate possible use possibly combined with a level <strong>of</strong> external<br />

contamination. A W/H ratio greater than 0.5 is likely <strong>to</strong> indicate that the source<br />

<strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the drug in the wash residue is from external contamination. The<br />

W/H ratios <strong>of</strong> 891 results were evaluated over 13 analytes. Between 74 and<br />

100% <strong>of</strong> the analytes studied produced W/H ratios less than 0.5, in particular<br />

for cannabis (93%) and cocaine (95%), where external contamination is more<br />

likely because <strong>of</strong> the way the drug is used. Hair samples from cocaine users<br />

and seized cocaine samples were compared for the possible pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong><br />

metabolites/chemical degradation products [446]. It was found that norcocaine,<br />

cocaethylene and anhydroecgonine methyl ester (each normalised <strong>to</strong> cocaine)<br />

were significantly increased in the incorporation group (i.e., hair samples from<br />

cocaine users). Hair samples were contaminated by rubbing with cocaine<br />

followed by sweat application, multiple shampoo treatments and s<strong>to</strong>rage <strong>to</strong><br />

study criteria <strong>to</strong> differentiate the use <strong>of</strong> cocaine from contamination [447]. All<br />

contaminated samples were correctly identified as contaminated by cut<strong>of</strong>f,<br />

benzoylecgonine presence, percent <strong>of</strong> benzoylecgonine, and/or the wash<br />

criterion.<br />

3.4.3 Sweat<br />

A controlled administration <strong>of</strong> MDMA <strong>to</strong> 15 volunteers with his<strong>to</strong>ries <strong>of</strong> MDMA<br />

use was conducted <strong>to</strong> understand the excretion <strong>of</strong> MDMA and metabolites in<br />

sweat [448]. MDMA was the primary analyte detected, with concentrations up<br />

<strong>to</strong> 3007 ng/patch. 35.0% and 9.4% <strong>of</strong> the samples were positive for MDMA and<br />

671

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!