Examination of Firearms Review: 2007 to 2010 - Interpol

(37) Adair TW. Manufacturing "Defects" in the Athletic Works Deck Shoe and
Their Implications for Examiners. The Information Bulletin for
Shoeprint/Toolmark Examiners, 2008 August, 14(2): 23-31.
(38) Adair TW. Outsole Design of the Nike Jordan B’2RUE: Implications for New
Examiners. The Information Bulletin for Shoeprint/Toolmark Examiners,
2008 January, 14(1): 26:30.
(39) Bodziak WJ. Tire Tread and tire Track Evidence: Recovery and Forensic
Examination, Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press, 2008, 342 pp.
(40) Nause LA and Soulier MP. Recording a Known Tyre Impression from a
Suspect Vehicle. Journal of Forensic Identification, 2008 58(3): 305-314.
(41) LeMay J, Adair TW, Fisher A, James J and Boltman B. Air Pressure and
Cargo Weight Affect the Width of Tyre Impressions. Journal of Forensic
Identification, 2008 November, 58(6): 660-665.
(42) LeMay J. Making Three-Dimensional Footwear Test Impressions with
“Bubber”. Journal of Forensic Identification, 2010, 60(4): 439-448.
(43) LeMay J. If the Shoe Fits: An Illustration of the Relevance of Footwear
Impression Evidence and Comparisons. Journal of Forensic Identification,
2010, 60 (3): 352-356.
(44) American Apparel and Footwear Association (AAFA) ShoeStats,
http://www.apparelandfootwear.org/Statistics.asp
(45) Wisbey D. Counterfeit Nike Sneakers. Journal of Forensic Identification,
2010, 60(3): 337-351.
(46) Petraco NDK, Gambino C, Kubic TA, Olivio D and Petraco N. Statistical
Discrimination of Footwear: A Method for the Comparison of Accidentals on
Shoe Outsoles Inspired by Facial Recognition Techniques. Journal of
Forensic Sciences, 2010 January, 55(1): 34-41.
(47) Biedermann A, Taroni F and Garbolino P. Equal prior probabilities: Can one
do any better? Forensic Science International. 2007, 172: 85–93.
(48) Jonasson L. Shoeprint Test 2 Report. The Information Bulletin for
Shoeprint/Toolmark Examiners, 2010 February, 16(1): 26:30.
(49) Bowen R and Schneider J. Forensic Databases: Paint, Shoe Prints, and
Beyond. NIJ Journal, 2007 October, 258: 34-38,
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/journals/258/forensic-databases.html
(50) Hamm, E. Footwear Recognition Program. 2010, personal communication.
(51) National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA) National Footwear
Reference Collection (NFRC), http://www.npia.police.uk/en/14141.htm.
(52) Lin G, Elmes G, Walnoha M and Chen X. Developing a Spatial-Temporal
Method for the Geographic Investigation of Shoeprint Evidence. Journal of
forensic Sciences, 2009 January, 54(1): 152-158.
(53) Al-Garni G and Hamiane M. A Novel Technique for Automatic Shoeprint
Image Retrieval. Forensic Science International, 2008 October, 181(1-3):
10-14.
(54) Dardi F, Cervelli F and Carrato S. A Texture Based Shoe Retrieval System
for Shoe Marks of Real Crime Scenes. Lecture Notes in Computer Science,
2009, 5716: 384-393.
(55) Pavlou M and Allinson N. Automated Encoding of Footwear Patterns for
Fast Indexing. Image and Vision Computing. 2009 March, 27(4): 402-409.
(56) Immersive Forensics Ltd. (UK) Latent Image Markup and Analysis (LIMA),
http://www.immersiveforensics.com/index.html.
80