26.01.2015 Views

The Mobile Internet Report Key Themes*

The Mobile Internet Report Key Themes*

The Mobile Internet Report Key Themes*

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Breaking Down OPEX and Capex Myths - New Technologies Should<br />

Easily Handle Demand w/o a Surge in OPEX and CAPEX<br />

2009E 2010E 2011E 2012E 2013E<br />

Estimated Demand at Cell Site (Mbps) 25 50 100 300 600<br />

OPEX - Backhaul<br />

T1s Needed to Meet Demand (1 T1 = 1.5 Mbps) 17 33 67 200 400<br />

Monthly Expense (1 T1 = $150) $2,500 $5,000 $10,000 $30,000 $60,000<br />

Fiber-based Ethernet Needed (1 Fiber Scalable 1,00 2 2 2 2 2<br />

Monthly Expense (1 Fiber = $2,500) $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000<br />

Microwave (1 Dish Scalable to 400 Mbps) 2 2 2 2 2<br />

Monthly Expense (1 Dish = $400) $800 $800 $800 $800 $800<br />

Capex for Technology (3G to 4G) per Cell Site<br />

Initial 3G Deployment (HSPA 3.6) $100,000 $97,000 $94,090 $91,267 $88,529<br />

Upgrade to HSPA 7.2 = 2x Capacity $25,000 $24,750 $24,503 $24,257 $24,015<br />

Upgrade to HSPA 21.1 = 5x Capacity $80,000 $77,600 $75,272 $73,014 $70,823<br />

Upgrade to LTE = +10x Capacity $85,000 $83,300 $81,634 $80,001 $78,401<br />

Need two for<br />

redundancy<br />

• Based on our estimated demand forecasts, the economics of using T1s, an operating<br />

expenditure (OPEX), are becoming less desirable. Technologies such as fiber-based<br />

Ethernet and microwave, which offer more capacity, have now become the technology<br />

of choice to meet the rising data demands without having to incur greater OPEX.<br />

• Furthermore, carriers likely will be able to leverage existing infrastructure from when<br />

3G technologies were initially deployed. For instance, to double capacity to HSPA 7.2<br />

(which is a software upgrade), a carrier needs to spend less than 25% of what it cost to<br />

initially deploy HSPA 3.6.<br />

Source: Simon Flannery, Morgan Stanley Research. 488

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!