14.11.2012 Views

Management of Technology and Innovation in Japan

Management of Technology and Innovation in Japan

Management of Technology and Innovation in Japan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Reorientation <strong>in</strong> Product Development for Multi-project <strong>Management</strong> 211<br />

new framework that moves beyond the balance between project <strong>and</strong> function orientated<br />

organizations.<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g sections exam<strong>in</strong>e that Toyota's reorganization <strong>in</strong>to product development<br />

centers may represent one way to manage multiple projects. By establish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

three centers, each <strong>of</strong> which conta<strong>in</strong>s several vehicle development projects, Toyota<br />

has improved <strong>in</strong>ter-project coord<strong>in</strong>ation among technically related projects. At the<br />

same time, Toyota has enhanced its exist<strong>in</strong>g capabilities by strengthen<strong>in</strong>g the authority<br />

<strong>of</strong> product managers over functional managers, <strong>and</strong> this has improved<br />

cross-functional <strong>in</strong>tegration. This paper focuses on how Toyota’s approach has<br />

solved the apparent contradiction between these two goals.<br />

This case study is based on seven <strong>in</strong>terview visits to Toyota between 1992 <strong>and</strong><br />

1996. The <strong>in</strong>terviewees <strong>in</strong>cluded four general managers who were <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the<br />

plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> this reorganization, as well as four product managers,<br />

eighteen vehicle eng<strong>in</strong>eers, <strong>and</strong> three cost management planners. In two <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>in</strong>terviews, the general managers, utiliz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternal documents, expla<strong>in</strong>ed the<br />

purposes, processes, <strong>and</strong> outcomes <strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong> the reorganization. In <strong>in</strong>terviews<br />

with other development personnel, we made <strong>in</strong>quiries about their own perspectives<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g the reorganization <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g specific <strong>in</strong>fluences to their own tasks<br />

<strong>and</strong> processes. These procedures played an important role <strong>in</strong> detect<strong>in</strong>g any potential<br />

personal biases <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terviewees.<br />

Traditional Shusa Organization at Toyota<br />

In 1953, Toyota assigned the first shusa, or product manager, to a new vehicle<br />

project (Ikari 1985) 1 . When Toyota started product development for the 1955<br />

Crown, Kenya Nakamura became the first shusa to head a project. At that time he<br />

was a member <strong>of</strong> the Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Management</strong> Division. The shusa organization<br />

was strengthened <strong>in</strong> February 1965 when Toyota formally established the Product<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g Division to organize <strong>and</strong> support shusas. At that time, there were already<br />

ten shusas, <strong>and</strong> each shusa had five or six staff members, which totaled about 50<br />

members <strong>in</strong> the division. The basic organizational structure with respect to the<br />

roles <strong>of</strong> the Product Plann<strong>in</strong>g Division <strong>and</strong> shusas did not fundamentally change<br />

until 1992, when Toyota <strong>in</strong>troduced the center organization. One <strong>of</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>or<br />

changes before that time was a change <strong>in</strong> the title name for a product manager<br />

from "shusa" to "chief eng<strong>in</strong>eer" <strong>in</strong> 1989. In order to avoid any confusion, the rest<br />

<strong>of</strong> this paper will consistently use the new term, chief eng<strong>in</strong>eer, to refer to this position,<br />

rather than shusa or (heavyweight) product manager.<br />

After hav<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed the same basic structure <strong>and</strong> processes for more than<br />

two decades, <strong>in</strong> 1990, Toyota decided to evaluate its entire product <strong>and</strong> technology<br />

development organization <strong>and</strong> to change it if necessary, so that the organization<br />

would fit the competitive environment at the end <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century. Toyota<br />

1 I referred to Ikari's book with respect to the <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g the early period <strong>of</strong><br />

the Shusa organization <strong>in</strong> the 1950s <strong>and</strong> 1960s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!