14.11.2012 Views

Management of Technology and Innovation in Japan

Management of Technology and Innovation in Japan

Management of Technology and Innovation in Japan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

230 K. Nobeoka<br />

Discussion <strong>and</strong> Conclusion<br />

This case study has discussed a new organizational structure that pursues multiproject<br />

management by analyz<strong>in</strong>g changes <strong>in</strong> product development organization at<br />

Toyota. This paper confirms that while enhanc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> utiliz<strong>in</strong>g its exist<strong>in</strong>g capabilities,<br />

Toyota has shifted beyond a traditional product development organization<br />

that is oriented towards either s<strong>in</strong>gle project or eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g functions.<br />

Figure 6 describes this evolution pattern with respect to the organizational orientation<br />

<strong>in</strong> product development. Toyota shifted from a function-oriented to project-oriented<br />

matrix structure <strong>in</strong> the 1960s (Ikari 1985). It ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed its heavyweight<br />

product management system until early 1990s. Dur<strong>in</strong>g 1992 <strong>and</strong> 1993,<br />

Toyota shifted from project-oriented management to multi-project management.<br />

In order to strengthen <strong>in</strong>ter-project coord<strong>in</strong>ation, which was becom<strong>in</strong>g important<br />

<strong>in</strong> the new competitive environment, Toyota could have weakened authority <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

product managers relative to functional managers who could have effectively<br />

managed <strong>in</strong>ter-project coord<strong>in</strong>ation at least with<strong>in</strong> their functions. However,<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the most important aspects <strong>of</strong> effective multi-project management is to improve<br />

both cross-functional <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ter-project <strong>in</strong>tegration simultaneously. Therefore,<br />

Toyota decided to strengthen both <strong>in</strong>tegration mechanisms at the same time.<br />

Strong<br />

Inter-Project<br />

Coord<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

Weak<br />

Functional Org.<br />

Weak<br />

Lightweight PM Org.<br />

(Chrysler, 1980s)<br />

Heavyweight PM Org.<br />

(Toyota, 1980s)<br />

Project Team Org.<br />

(Chrysler, 1990s)<br />

Cross-Functional<br />

Coord<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

Multi-Project Org.<br />

(Toyota, 1990s)<br />

Fig. 6. Evolution pattern to multi-project management<br />

Strong<br />

Toyota<br />

Chrysler<br />

While develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ter-project coord<strong>in</strong>ation mechanisms <strong>and</strong> processes, Toyota<br />

also enhanced its capabilities that had been accumulated <strong>in</strong> the heavyweight product<br />

management organization. The center organization at Toyota significantly improved<br />

<strong>in</strong>ter-project coord<strong>in</strong>ation among technically related projects. At the same<br />

time, Toyota has improved cross-functional <strong>in</strong>tegration by strengthen<strong>in</strong>g the authority<br />

<strong>of</strong> product managers, who are supported by center heads, over functional<br />

managers. Cross-functional <strong>in</strong>tegration tasks were also streaml<strong>in</strong>ed so that additional<br />

tasks for <strong>in</strong>ter-project <strong>in</strong>tegration can be carried out more effectively.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!