14.11.2012 Views

Management of Technology and Innovation in Japan

Management of Technology and Innovation in Japan

Management of Technology and Innovation in Japan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Invisible Dimensions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innovation</strong>: Strategy for<br />

De-commoditization <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Japan</strong>ese Electronics<br />

Industry<br />

Ken Kusunoki<br />

Digitization, Modularization, <strong>and</strong> Commoditization<br />

Companies are hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g difficulty <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g new value. Competition is<br />

<strong>in</strong>tensify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> squeez<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>of</strong>it marg<strong>in</strong>s. Pr<strong>of</strong>it is the difference between revenue<br />

<strong>and</strong> costs; the gap between the cost <strong>of</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g a good or service <strong>and</strong> what a customer<br />

is will<strong>in</strong>g to pay for that good or service (I shall refer hereafter to the concept<br />

<strong>of</strong> WTP, or Will<strong>in</strong>gness to Pay). There are only two ways to <strong>in</strong>crease pr<strong>of</strong>its:<br />

Reduce costs or boost customer WTP. Companies have tried various “best practices”<br />

to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itability: restructur<strong>in</strong>g with a focus on “core bus<strong>in</strong>esses,”<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess process re-eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>formation technology-driven supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

management (SCM) <strong>in</strong>itiatives, outsourc<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> globalization.<br />

These efforts are fundamentally focused on reduc<strong>in</strong>g cost. And while cost reduction<br />

is important, it is <strong>in</strong>sufficient to susta<strong>in</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itability. By its very def<strong>in</strong>ition,<br />

cost-based competition converges on the physical limits <strong>of</strong> cost <strong>and</strong> price <strong>and</strong><br />

ultimately is a dead-end path. Companies focused exclusively on reduc<strong>in</strong>g costs<br />

will hang themselves with their own ropes. Firms must <strong>in</strong>crease customer WTP <strong>in</strong><br />

order to add new value to their products <strong>and</strong> services.<br />

Competitive environment changes <strong>in</strong> recent years make it <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly difficult<br />

to boost WTP. One key underly<strong>in</strong>g factor is the threat <strong>of</strong> commoditization. The essence<br />

<strong>of</strong> strategy is do<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>gs differently from competitors, <strong>and</strong> it is difficult to<br />

create differences once a product or service becomes a commodity; "price" becomes<br />

the only differentiator a firm can show customers. Commoditization, therefore,<br />

means competition converges on cost. Moreover, the speed at which products<br />

<strong>and</strong> services become commodities has dramatically <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> recent years. We<br />

can see many good examples <strong>in</strong> the electronics <strong>in</strong>dustry which has been hit hard<br />

by the forces <strong>of</strong> rapid digitization over the last decade.<br />

Digitization affects natures <strong>of</strong> product systems <strong>in</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> ways. Of these,<br />

the most fundamental change is the "modularization" <strong>of</strong> architectures. Architecture<br />

def<strong>in</strong>es how to break a system down <strong>in</strong>to components <strong>and</strong> how those system<br />

components are <strong>in</strong>terrelated <strong>in</strong> what we call “subsystem <strong>in</strong>terdependencies." It is a<br />

concept for underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g system states. Modularization means "break<strong>in</strong>g down<br />

an entire system <strong>in</strong>to multiple groups (modules), each <strong>of</strong> which consists <strong>of</strong> a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> highly <strong>in</strong>terdependent subsystems, with predef<strong>in</strong>ed rules regard<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>terface<br />

between modules." Modularization could be def<strong>in</strong>ed as a strategy for m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

system complexity <strong>and</strong> relational <strong>in</strong>terdependence between components by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!