Management of Technology and Innovation in Japan
Management of Technology and Innovation in Japan
Management of Technology and Innovation in Japan
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
332 C. Herstatt, B. Verworn, <strong>and</strong> A. Nagahira<br />
Cultural Differences<br />
In addition to the firm’s perceived degree <strong>of</strong> newness <strong>of</strong> the planned product <strong>in</strong>novation,<br />
other factors such as branch specific or cultural differences might have an<br />
impact on the new product development process <strong>and</strong> particularly on the way uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties<br />
are reduced dur<strong>in</strong>g the fuzzy front end phase.<br />
Although <strong>of</strong>ten criticized, f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from H<strong>of</strong>stede <strong>and</strong> others <strong>in</strong>dicate a difference<br />
between cultures with regard to uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty avoidance (Song <strong>and</strong> Montoya-<br />
Weiss 2001; H<strong>of</strong>stede 1980). Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty avoidance accord<strong>in</strong>g to H<strong>of</strong>stede, measures<br />
the extent to which <strong>in</strong>dividuals are able to tolerate ambiguity (H<strong>of</strong>stede 1980,<br />
p. 112). Whilst Galbraith takes an <strong>in</strong>formation process<strong>in</strong>g view, H<strong>of</strong>stede emphasizes<br />
subjective attitudes towards situations where little <strong>in</strong>formation is available.<br />
Both views can be comb<strong>in</strong>ed to form the view that the basic <strong>in</strong>formation gather<strong>in</strong>g<br />
tasks required for successful <strong>in</strong>novation differ <strong>in</strong> emphasis accord<strong>in</strong>g to the level<br />
<strong>of</strong> perceived uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty (Song <strong>and</strong> Montoya-Weiss 2001, p. 65). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
H<strong>of</strong>stede, <strong>in</strong> <strong>Japan</strong>, uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty avoidance tendencies can be expected to be higher<br />
than <strong>in</strong> Germany (H<strong>of</strong>stede 1980, p. 122). Consequently, <strong>in</strong> <strong>Japan</strong>ese projects, a<br />
greater need to avoid ambiguity can be expected. In terms <strong>of</strong> New Product Development,<br />
this suggests that <strong>Japan</strong>ese managers may tend to have a bias towards<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g to reduce the possibility <strong>of</strong> failures (Song <strong>and</strong> Montoya-Weiss 2001, p.<br />
64). Furthermore, <strong>Japan</strong>ese managers tend to def<strong>in</strong>e roles <strong>and</strong> responsibilities<br />
clearly. They also apply st<strong>and</strong>ardized procedures <strong>and</strong> draw upon a variety <strong>of</strong> tools<br />
<strong>and</strong> methods <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>novation projects <strong>of</strong> high uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty (H<strong>of</strong>stede 1980, p. 264).<br />
Study<br />
Aim <strong>of</strong> the Exploratory Study<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> large scale empirical studies <strong>of</strong> the fuzzy front end, as well as large scale<br />
cross-national comparative studies form part <strong>of</strong> the research on success factors for<br />
New Product Development, where most <strong>of</strong> the activities dur<strong>in</strong>g the fuzzy front end<br />
were comb<strong>in</strong>ed under one head<strong>in</strong>g like “pre-development activities” (Cooper <strong>and</strong><br />
Kle<strong>in</strong>schmidt 1994, p. 26; Song <strong>and</strong> Parry 1996, p. 433; Song <strong>and</strong> Parry 1997, p.<br />
3) but not outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> any further detail. This exploratory study tries to develop a<br />
deeper underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the major tasks to be undertaken dur<strong>in</strong>g the fuzzy front<br />
end – to reduce project uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties, e. g. related to market or technology. In addition,<br />
former studies <strong>in</strong>dicate that besides company or project specific contextual<br />
factors like company size or degree <strong>of</strong> newness <strong>of</strong> a project, cultural differences<br />
might <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>in</strong>novation related activities <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the front end (Jürgens<br />
2000, pp. 2–4; Mishra et al., p. 530; Song <strong>and</strong> Parry 1996, p. 432; Song <strong>and</strong> Xie<br />
1996, p. 5; Souder <strong>and</strong> Song 1998, p. 222). Therefore, the second objective <strong>of</strong> our<br />
exploratory study was to determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>itial <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>of</strong> cultural differences <strong>in</strong><br />
terms <strong>of</strong> the way that uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties are reduced at the start the <strong>in</strong>novation process.<br />
Germany <strong>and</strong> <strong>Japan</strong> were chosen because literature <strong>in</strong>dicates differences <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>no-