30.01.2015 Views

The Design of Diagnostic Medical Facilities where ... - ResearchGate

The Design of Diagnostic Medical Facilities where ... - ResearchGate

The Design of Diagnostic Medical Facilities where ... - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Published occupancy factors, shown in Table 5.5, are intended to be indicative but provide useful guidance<br />

<strong>where</strong> other data are not available (BIR, 2000, NCRP, 2004). <strong>The</strong>re are some differences in the levels<br />

recommended by the BIR and the NCRP, but they both follow a broadly similar approach. One exception is<br />

the occupancy for employee lounges (NCRP)/staff rooms (BIR) which is recommended as 1/5 and 100%<br />

respectively. <strong>The</strong> BIR suggest that the lowest occupancy factor used be 5% (BIR, 2000). An RPA should be<br />

consulted regarding occupancy levels <strong>where</strong> additional guidance is required.<br />

Particular care must be taken when classifying corridors as low occupancy areas. <strong>The</strong>re may be another room<br />

or <strong>of</strong>fice located across the corridor with a much higher occupancy and it must be ensured that such areas<br />

are adequately protected. Likewise a low occupancy space outside a window may give a false sense <strong>of</strong><br />

security if there are nearby buildings with high occupancy. Adjacent <strong>of</strong>fices/buildings that are not under the<br />

same administration, or that are owned by a third party, should be assumed to have an occupancy factor <strong>of</strong><br />

100%, as they are subject to change without consultation or control (NCRP, 2004).<br />

Finally, in this connection, shielding calculations must be reviewed if the use/occupancy <strong>of</strong> an adjoining area<br />

changes. This is an issue over which there may be little control and which can inadvertently give rise to<br />

unexpected radiation hazards. It is well to make allowances for this at the design stage as records <strong>of</strong> the<br />

shielding calculations and specifications may not always be available or accessible in the future.<br />

Table 5.5: Suggested occupancy factors for radiation shielding design (based on BIR, 2000 and NCRP, 2004)<br />

Location BIR NCRP<br />

Adjacent X‐ray room 100% 1<br />

Reception areas 100% 1<br />

Film reading area 100% 1<br />

Offices, shops, living quarters, children’s indoor play areas,<br />

occupied space in nearby buildings<br />

100% 1<br />

X‐ray control room 100% 1<br />

Nurses’ station 100% 1<br />

Staff room 100% 1/5<br />

Patient examination and treatment rooms 50% 1/2<br />

Wards, patient rooms 20% 1/5<br />

Staff rest rooms - 1/5<br />

Corridors 20% 1/5<br />

Corridor doors - 1/8<br />

Toilets or bathrooms 10% 1/20<br />

Outdoor areas with seating 10% 1/20<br />

Storage rooms 5% 1/20<br />

Unattended vending areas 5% 1/20<br />

Patient changing room 5% 1/20<br />

Unattended waiting rooms 5% 1/20<br />

Stairways 5% 1/40<br />

Unattended car parks 5% 1/40<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Diagnostic</strong> <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Facilities</strong> <strong>where</strong> Ionising Radiation is used 55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!