The Design of Diagnostic Medical Facilities where ... - ResearchGate
The Design of Diagnostic Medical Facilities where ... - ResearchGate
The Design of Diagnostic Medical Facilities where ... - ResearchGate
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
) NCRP method<br />
<strong>The</strong> air kerma from unshielded secondary radiation, K sec<br />
(0), at a distance d sec<br />
for N patients is given by:<br />
K N<br />
K<br />
sec(0)<br />
=<br />
d<br />
1<br />
sec<br />
2<br />
sec<br />
<strong>where</strong> K 1 sec<br />
= the total unshielded secondary air kerma (mGy) per patient<br />
for leakage plus scatter radiations at 1 m. <strong>The</strong> values for<br />
various workload distributions, published by the NCRP<br />
(2004), are given in Table 5.4<br />
N = number <strong>of</strong> patients per week<br />
d sec<br />
= distance from source (m)<br />
<strong>The</strong> ceiling in this case would be described as radiography room (floor or other barriers). For this<br />
workload distribution, the total unshielded secondary air kerma per patient, K 1 sec<br />
at 1 m is given as 2.3<br />
x 10 -2 mGy. (NCRP, 2004)<br />
At a distance <strong>of</strong> 2.5 m, this gives:<br />
K sec<br />
(0) = (2.3 x 10 -2 mGy) x 300 patients per week<br />
(2.5) 2<br />
K sec<br />
(0) = 1.104 mGy per week<br />
<strong>The</strong> level <strong>of</strong> shielding required to meet the weekly design goal (modified by occupancy) can then be<br />
determined as follows:<br />
<strong>The</strong> weekly design goal, P =<br />
0.3 mSv<br />
= 0.006 mGy per week<br />
52<br />
Occupancy factor, T = 1<br />
<strong>Design</strong> goal modified by occupancy, (P/T) = 0.006 mGy per week<br />
<strong>The</strong> secondary barrier transmission required to reduce the air kerma to a value less than (P/T) is<br />
therefore:<br />
0.006 mGy per week<br />
Bsec (x<br />
barrier)<br />
=<br />
1.104 mGy per week<br />
B<br />
−3<br />
sec barrier)<br />
= 5.4 × 10<br />
(x<br />
Using the graphs from the NCRP to get barrier thickness, x barrier<br />
, gives a lead equivalence <strong>of</strong> approx. 1.4<br />
mm for the ceiling or 110 mm concrete, which is similar to but not identical with the conclusion from<br />
the BIR method.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Design</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Diagnostic</strong> <strong>Medical</strong> <strong>Facilities</strong> <strong>where</strong> Ionising Radiation is used 67