1 - National Labor Relations Board
1 - National Labor Relations Board
1 - National Labor Relations Board
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
98 Thirty-fourth Annual Report of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Labor</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> <strong>Board</strong><br />
threatened disciplinary action over disagreements involving contract<br />
interpretations and grievance adjustments. Noting,,iPlat<br />
section 8 (b) (1) (B) was enacted to prevent union interfence<br />
with an employer's control over its own representatives, the<br />
<strong>Board</strong> found the prohibition no less applicable because the union<br />
sought the substitution of attitudes rather than persons, and<br />
exerted its pressure on the employer through indirect rather<br />
than direct means. As the pressure was in fact exerted for the<br />
purpose of interfering with the employer's control over his representatives,<br />
the <strong>Board</strong> held the conduct fell outside the legitimate<br />
internal interests of the union and therefore violated<br />
section 8(b) (1) (B). In Toledo Blade, 71 union action in imposing<br />
fines upon three of its members, the employer's superintendent<br />
and two foremen, for performing excessive work in violation of<br />
the contract was found to have violated section 8(b) (1) (B) by<br />
restraining the employer in the selection of his representatives<br />
for the purposes of negotiations and handling grievances. The<br />
union's assertion of disciplinary authority over the supervisors,<br />
who had substantial authority to handle grievances, was found<br />
to infringe upon the employer's right to control and rely on his<br />
representatives. The <strong>Board</strong> further held that even if the foremen<br />
had not actually served their employer as bargaining representatives,<br />
the employer was entitled to the protection of section<br />
8(b) (1) (B) in his future designation and reliance upon representatives<br />
selected from an uncoerced group of supervisors qualified<br />
as representatives because of their day-to-day supervisory<br />
roles.<br />
In other cases the <strong>Board</strong> held a union violated section 8(b) (1)<br />
(B) by fining a member of the union employed as a construction<br />
superintendent for having urged employees to vote against the<br />
union in an upcoming <strong>Board</strong> election, 72 and by fining a member<br />
for reporting to work as a supervisor without having obtained<br />
job clearance and referral from the union, for working thereafter<br />
for an employer who did not contribute to the union health and<br />
welfare fund, and for failing to cease work when requested to<br />
do so by the union's business agent.73<br />
3. Union Rules and the Duty of Fair Representation<br />
The actions of labor organizations in enforcement of union<br />
rules establishing conditions of employment for its members,<br />
71 Toledo Locale I5—P & 272, Lithographers (Toledo Blade Co.), 175 NLRB No. 173.<br />
72 New Mexico District Council (A.S. Horner), 176 NLRB No. 105.<br />
"New Mexico District Councll (A.S. Horner), 177 NLRB No. 76.