07.02.2015 Views

1 - National Labor Relations Board

1 - National Labor Relations Board

1 - National Labor Relations Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

104 Thirty-fourth Annual Report of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Labor</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> <strong>Board</strong><br />

In the American Guild case, 85 the <strong>Board</strong> applied in an unusual<br />

context the established principle that direct appeals to all those<br />

approaching the situs of a dispute for the purpose of contributing<br />

to the operations which the strike is seeking to halt is traditional<br />

primary activity outside the scope of section 8(b) (4). In support<br />

of a strike by the union representing the orchestras at Nevada<br />

gambling casinos, AGVA sent telegrams to those of its members<br />

scheduled to provide star entertainment at the casinos advising<br />

them to honor the picket lines or they would be in violation of<br />

the union constitution and subject to disciplinary action. The<br />

<strong>Board</strong> noted that the request to honor the primary picket lines<br />

called for action only at the situs of the dispute and was not<br />

substantially different than the appeal of the striking union in<br />

conducting the picketing. As such, it found the conduct was not<br />

illegal secondary activity by virtue of the fact that it assisted<br />

another union in that union's labor dispute. The <strong>Board</strong> also<br />

found that the performances of the star entertainers to whom<br />

the appeals were directed were considered to be customary and<br />

necessary adjuncts of the casino operations, enhancing the<br />

financial success of the casinos. It therefore concluded that the<br />

communications were appeals for actions constituting permissible<br />

primary activity and dismissed the complaint.<br />

3. Work Preservation Issues<br />

The <strong>Board</strong> has long held, with court approval, that a union's<br />

strike to preserve the work of employees in the bargaining unit<br />

represented by it is primary action within the protection of the<br />

proviso to section 8(b) (4) (B), 86 notwithstanding that it may<br />

also have a secondary impact. 87 It_is equally well established,<br />

however, that a similar strike to preserve the work of union<br />

members generally exceeds the legitimate interests of the union<br />

in the bargaining unit and therefore constitutes secondary activity<br />

prohibited by section 8(b) (4) (i) and (ii) (B) of the Act.<br />

The <strong>Board</strong> had occasion during the year to draw this line in<br />

several cases, among them one 88 in which the union brought<br />

6'5 American Guild of Variety Artists (Harrah's Club), 176 NLRB No. 77.<br />

8° The proviso reads as follows: "Provided, That nothing contained in this clause (B) shall<br />

be construed to make unlawful, where not otherwise unlawful, any primary strike or primary<br />

picketing."<br />

"E.g., Intl. Assn. of Heat & Frost Insulators, 148 NLRB 866, enfd. in part glib nom. Houston<br />

Insulation Contractors Assn v. N.L.R.B., 357 F.2d 182 (C.A. 5), offd. 386 U.S. 664.<br />

as Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local 386, IBT (R. P. B. Trucking),<br />

172 NLRB No. 102.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!