1 - National Labor Relations Board
1 - National Labor Relations Board
1 - National Labor Relations Board
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
104 Thirty-fourth Annual Report of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Labor</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> <strong>Board</strong><br />
In the American Guild case, 85 the <strong>Board</strong> applied in an unusual<br />
context the established principle that direct appeals to all those<br />
approaching the situs of a dispute for the purpose of contributing<br />
to the operations which the strike is seeking to halt is traditional<br />
primary activity outside the scope of section 8(b) (4). In support<br />
of a strike by the union representing the orchestras at Nevada<br />
gambling casinos, AGVA sent telegrams to those of its members<br />
scheduled to provide star entertainment at the casinos advising<br />
them to honor the picket lines or they would be in violation of<br />
the union constitution and subject to disciplinary action. The<br />
<strong>Board</strong> noted that the request to honor the primary picket lines<br />
called for action only at the situs of the dispute and was not<br />
substantially different than the appeal of the striking union in<br />
conducting the picketing. As such, it found the conduct was not<br />
illegal secondary activity by virtue of the fact that it assisted<br />
another union in that union's labor dispute. The <strong>Board</strong> also<br />
found that the performances of the star entertainers to whom<br />
the appeals were directed were considered to be customary and<br />
necessary adjuncts of the casino operations, enhancing the<br />
financial success of the casinos. It therefore concluded that the<br />
communications were appeals for actions constituting permissible<br />
primary activity and dismissed the complaint.<br />
3. Work Preservation Issues<br />
The <strong>Board</strong> has long held, with court approval, that a union's<br />
strike to preserve the work of employees in the bargaining unit<br />
represented by it is primary action within the protection of the<br />
proviso to section 8(b) (4) (B), 86 notwithstanding that it may<br />
also have a secondary impact. 87 It_is equally well established,<br />
however, that a similar strike to preserve the work of union<br />
members generally exceeds the legitimate interests of the union<br />
in the bargaining unit and therefore constitutes secondary activity<br />
prohibited by section 8(b) (4) (i) and (ii) (B) of the Act.<br />
The <strong>Board</strong> had occasion during the year to draw this line in<br />
several cases, among them one 88 in which the union brought<br />
6'5 American Guild of Variety Artists (Harrah's Club), 176 NLRB No. 77.<br />
8° The proviso reads as follows: "Provided, That nothing contained in this clause (B) shall<br />
be construed to make unlawful, where not otherwise unlawful, any primary strike or primary<br />
picketing."<br />
"E.g., Intl. Assn. of Heat & Frost Insulators, 148 NLRB 866, enfd. in part glib nom. Houston<br />
Insulation Contractors Assn v. N.L.R.B., 357 F.2d 182 (C.A. 5), offd. 386 U.S. 664.<br />
as Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local 386, IBT (R. P. B. Trucking),<br />
172 NLRB No. 102.