1 - National Labor Relations Board
1 - National Labor Relations Board
1 - National Labor Relations Board
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Unfair <strong>Labor</strong> Practices 77<br />
cumstances which indicate actual prejudice to the integrity of<br />
the collective-bargaining relationship.<br />
C. The Bargaining Obligation<br />
Section 8(a) (5) makes it an unfair labor practice for an employer<br />
to refuse to bargain in good faith about wages, hours,<br />
and other terms and conditions of employment with the representative<br />
selected by a majority of the employees in an appropriate<br />
unit.<br />
Section 8(b) (3) prohibits a labor organization from refusing<br />
"to bargain collectively with an employer, provided it is the<br />
representative of his employees subject to the provisions of section<br />
9 (a)." The requisites of good-faith collective bargaining are<br />
set forth in section 8(d) of the Act.15<br />
1. Proof of Representatives' Majority Status<br />
It is well settled that the <strong>Board</strong>'s election process, although<br />
the preferred manner whereby a union may establish its majority<br />
status, is not the only way of doing so. In those circumstances<br />
where an employer's actions in refusing to recognize a union<br />
would be violative of section 8 (a) (5) if the union were in fact<br />
the majority representative, other methods of establishing that<br />
status, such as valid authorization cards, may be relied on by<br />
the <strong>Board</strong>. 16 In one case 17 in which the <strong>Board</strong> considered the<br />
adequacy of authorization cards to establish the majority status<br />
of a union, it was again called upon to pass on the contention<br />
that the cards were invalid because obtained upon representations<br />
that they were to be used to obtain a <strong>Board</strong> election. Rejecting<br />
this contention, the <strong>Board</strong> held that such a representation<br />
did not provide sufficient basis in itself to vitiate an unambiguously<br />
worded authorization card on any theory of misrepresentation<br />
as to purpose, where there was no representation that<br />
the only purpose was to get an election.<br />
The <strong>Board</strong> noted that the central inquiry in determining the<br />
effect to be given the cards is whether the employees manifested<br />
an intent to designate the union as their bargaining agent by<br />
" As defined by sec. 8(d) of the Act, the statutory duty to bargain includes the duty<br />
of the respective parties "to meet at reasonable times and confer in good faith with respect<br />
to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment, or the negotiation of an<br />
agreement, or any question arising thereunder, and the execution of a written contract incorporating<br />
any agreement reached if requested by either party." However, "such obligation does<br />
not compel either party to agree to a proposal or require the making of a concession."<br />
" See, e.g., Thirty-third Annual Report (1968), pp. 88-90.<br />
" McEwen Mf g. Co. & Washington Industries, 172 NLRB No. 99.