07.02.2015 Views

1 - National Labor Relations Board

1 - National Labor Relations Board

1 - National Labor Relations Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Unfair <strong>Labor</strong> Practices 77<br />

cumstances which indicate actual prejudice to the integrity of<br />

the collective-bargaining relationship.<br />

C. The Bargaining Obligation<br />

Section 8(a) (5) makes it an unfair labor practice for an employer<br />

to refuse to bargain in good faith about wages, hours,<br />

and other terms and conditions of employment with the representative<br />

selected by a majority of the employees in an appropriate<br />

unit.<br />

Section 8(b) (3) prohibits a labor organization from refusing<br />

"to bargain collectively with an employer, provided it is the<br />

representative of his employees subject to the provisions of section<br />

9 (a)." The requisites of good-faith collective bargaining are<br />

set forth in section 8(d) of the Act.15<br />

1. Proof of Representatives' Majority Status<br />

It is well settled that the <strong>Board</strong>'s election process, although<br />

the preferred manner whereby a union may establish its majority<br />

status, is not the only way of doing so. In those circumstances<br />

where an employer's actions in refusing to recognize a union<br />

would be violative of section 8 (a) (5) if the union were in fact<br />

the majority representative, other methods of establishing that<br />

status, such as valid authorization cards, may be relied on by<br />

the <strong>Board</strong>. 16 In one case 17 in which the <strong>Board</strong> considered the<br />

adequacy of authorization cards to establish the majority status<br />

of a union, it was again called upon to pass on the contention<br />

that the cards were invalid because obtained upon representations<br />

that they were to be used to obtain a <strong>Board</strong> election. Rejecting<br />

this contention, the <strong>Board</strong> held that such a representation<br />

did not provide sufficient basis in itself to vitiate an unambiguously<br />

worded authorization card on any theory of misrepresentation<br />

as to purpose, where there was no representation that<br />

the only purpose was to get an election.<br />

The <strong>Board</strong> noted that the central inquiry in determining the<br />

effect to be given the cards is whether the employees manifested<br />

an intent to designate the union as their bargaining agent by<br />

" As defined by sec. 8(d) of the Act, the statutory duty to bargain includes the duty<br />

of the respective parties "to meet at reasonable times and confer in good faith with respect<br />

to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment, or the negotiation of an<br />

agreement, or any question arising thereunder, and the execution of a written contract incorporating<br />

any agreement reached if requested by either party." However, "such obligation does<br />

not compel either party to agree to a proposal or require the making of a concession."<br />

" See, e.g., Thirty-third Annual Report (1968), pp. 88-90.<br />

" McEwen Mf g. Co. & Washington Industries, 172 NLRB No. 99.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!