1 - National Labor Relations Board
1 - National Labor Relations Board
1 - National Labor Relations Board
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
56 Thirty-fourth Annual Report of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Labor</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> <strong>Board</strong><br />
In two cases, the <strong>Board</strong> approved initial establishment of separate<br />
units of employees engaged in printing operations. In<br />
one 38 the union sought a unit of roller and screen print machine<br />
operators at a textile manufacturing plant. The <strong>Board</strong> noted that<br />
it had consistently held that roller machine operators form a<br />
traditional craft unit appropriate for the purposes of collective<br />
bargaining, particularily where, as here, there was no interchange<br />
or transfer between printers and employees of other departments,<br />
and no bargaining history on a plantwide basis. The<br />
petitioning union had traditionally represented machine printers<br />
on a craft basis, the printers received a substantially higher<br />
rate of pay than other employees on the machine, they directed<br />
the other employees in operating the machines, and all had previously<br />
worked on the machines as inspectors or backtenders.<br />
In view of the common supervision, interchange, and similarity<br />
of work performed by the screen and roller printers, the <strong>Board</strong><br />
found that a unit composed of operators of both types of machines<br />
was appropriate.<br />
The other case 39 involved a request for a separate unit of<br />
employees in the lithography department of a company engaged<br />
in the manufacture of aerosol metal containers. The <strong>Board</strong> noted<br />
that the employees in question utilized the standard equipment,<br />
performed the usual duties, and exercised the customary skills<br />
utilized by lithographic employees whom the <strong>Board</strong> had frequently<br />
held to be a cohesive unit appropriate for collective<br />
bargaining. The frequency of transfer of employees into the<br />
lithographic department and the degree of integration of the<br />
employer's operations were insufficient to ,negate the appropriateness<br />
of a separate unit of lithographic department employees<br />
and since the plant involved was not yet fully operative, similarity<br />
of working conditions with other employees could not be relied<br />
on as a determinative factor. Accordingly, the <strong>Board</strong> directed<br />
a self-determination election among the lithography department<br />
employees.<br />
In Parke Davis & Co., 10 the <strong>Board</strong> concluded that initial establishment<br />
of a separate unit of powerhouse employees would<br />
be appropriate. The powerhouse employees' work was found to be<br />
functionally distinct, and their supervision separate from that of<br />
other employeE s. They are licensed in their skills, had a separate<br />
line of seniority and job progression, received a different pay<br />
38 Fulton Cotton Mills, Div. of Allied Products Corp. 175 NLRB No. 17.<br />
" Sherwin-Williams Co., 173 NLRB No. 54.<br />
40 173 NLRB No. 53.