07.02.2015 Views

1 - National Labor Relations Board

1 - National Labor Relations Board

1 - National Labor Relations Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

56 Thirty-fourth Annual Report of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Labor</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> <strong>Board</strong><br />

In two cases, the <strong>Board</strong> approved initial establishment of separate<br />

units of employees engaged in printing operations. In<br />

one 38 the union sought a unit of roller and screen print machine<br />

operators at a textile manufacturing plant. The <strong>Board</strong> noted that<br />

it had consistently held that roller machine operators form a<br />

traditional craft unit appropriate for the purposes of collective<br />

bargaining, particularily where, as here, there was no interchange<br />

or transfer between printers and employees of other departments,<br />

and no bargaining history on a plantwide basis. The<br />

petitioning union had traditionally represented machine printers<br />

on a craft basis, the printers received a substantially higher<br />

rate of pay than other employees on the machine, they directed<br />

the other employees in operating the machines, and all had previously<br />

worked on the machines as inspectors or backtenders.<br />

In view of the common supervision, interchange, and similarity<br />

of work performed by the screen and roller printers, the <strong>Board</strong><br />

found that a unit composed of operators of both types of machines<br />

was appropriate.<br />

The other case 39 involved a request for a separate unit of<br />

employees in the lithography department of a company engaged<br />

in the manufacture of aerosol metal containers. The <strong>Board</strong> noted<br />

that the employees in question utilized the standard equipment,<br />

performed the usual duties, and exercised the customary skills<br />

utilized by lithographic employees whom the <strong>Board</strong> had frequently<br />

held to be a cohesive unit appropriate for collective<br />

bargaining. The frequency of transfer of employees into the<br />

lithographic department and the degree of integration of the<br />

employer's operations were insufficient to ,negate the appropriateness<br />

of a separate unit of lithographic department employees<br />

and since the plant involved was not yet fully operative, similarity<br />

of working conditions with other employees could not be relied<br />

on as a determinative factor. Accordingly, the <strong>Board</strong> directed<br />

a self-determination election among the lithography department<br />

employees.<br />

In Parke Davis & Co., 10 the <strong>Board</strong> concluded that initial establishment<br />

of a separate unit of powerhouse employees would<br />

be appropriate. The powerhouse employees' work was found to be<br />

functionally distinct, and their supervision separate from that of<br />

other employeE s. They are licensed in their skills, had a separate<br />

line of seniority and job progression, received a different pay<br />

38 Fulton Cotton Mills, Div. of Allied Products Corp. 175 NLRB No. 17.<br />

" Sherwin-Williams Co., 173 NLRB No. 54.<br />

40 173 NLRB No. 53.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!