1 - National Labor Relations Board

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Operations in Fiscal Year 1969 5 decertify unions as bargaining agents as well as voting to determine whether a union shall continue to have the right to make a union-shop contract with an employer. In handling unfair labor practice cases and elections, the Agency is concerned with the adjustment of labor disputes either by way of investigation and informal settlements or through its quasi-judicial proceedings. Congress created the Agency in 1935 because labor disputes could and did threaten the health of the economy. In the 1947 and 1959 amendments to the Act, Congress Chart 4 NUMBER AND AGE OF UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE CASES PENDING UNDER PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION, MONTH TO MONTH 2,600 MEDIAN NO. OF ULP CASES PENDING 2,313 2,234 2,000 1,619 1675 1,825 2,035 1,500 1,208 1,322 1,000 1,051 998 500 Cases 0 Days 10 20 30 40 50 60 Fiscal Year 23 21 22 2/1 23 25 26 27 26 25 MEDIAN AGE (DAYS) 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969
6 Thirty-fourth Annual Report of the National Labor Relations Board reaffirmed need for the Agency and increased the scope of its regulatory powers. NLRB has no statutory independent power of enforcement of its orders but may seek enforcement in the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Similarly parties aggrieved by the orders may seek judicial review. Agency authority is divided by law and by delegation. The Board Members primarily act as a quasi-judicial body in deciding cases upon formal records. The General Counsel is responsible for the issuance and prosecution of formal complaints and for prosecution of cases before the courts and has general supervision of the NLRB's regional offices. Chart 5 UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE MERIT FACTOR FISCAL YEAR 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 11111111111111111111111111111 29 1 276 111111111111111111111 IMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 39 7 •1H111111111111111111111 32 3 •11111111111111111111111111 314 111111111111111111111111111 - 5 1966 1111111111111111111111111111 36.6 1967 11111111111111111111111111 36.2 1968 111111111111111111111111 34'7 1969 PERCENT 0 111111111111111111111 32 3 I )0 PRECOMPLAINT SETTLEMENTS AND ADJUSTMENTS CASES IN WHICH COMPLAINTS ISSUED III 111111 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 PRECOMPLAINT SETTLEMENTS AND ADJUSTMENTS (%) 11.9 14.1 15.3 17.5 17.8 19.4 19.4 20.5 20.2 18.4 CASES IN WHICH COMPLAINTS ISSUED (5) 17.2 13.5 15.4 14.8 15.6 16.1 17.2 15.7 14.5 13.9 TOTAL MERIT FACTOR VS) 29.1 27.6 30.7 32.3 33.4 35.5 36.6 36.2 34.7 32.3
Page 1 and 2: TMR.TY-FOURM ANNUAL REPORT
Page 4: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Memb
Page 8 and 9: 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I. Oper
Page 10: Table of Contents ix Page 1. Preser
Page 13 and 14: 2 Thirty-fourth Annual Report of th
Page 15: 4 Thirty-fourth Annual Report of th
Page 19 and 20: 1 8 Thirty-fourth Annual Report of
Page 21 and 22: 10 Thirty-fourth Annual Report of t
Page 27 and 28: PERCENT PERCENT 100 100 1111111 90
Page 39 and 40: II Jurisdiction of the Board The Bo
Page 55 and 56: V Representation Cases The Act requ
Page 67 and 68:
56 Thirty-fourth Annual Report of t
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
VI Unfair Labor Practices The Board
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
100 Thirty-fourth Annual Report of
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
VIII Enforcement Litigation Board o
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
IX Injunction Litigation Section 10
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Table 3A.—Formal Actions Taken in
Page 213 and 214:
Table 4.—Remedial Actions Taken i
Page 215 and 216:
Table 5.—Industrial Distribution
Page 217 and 218:
Table 6.—Geographic Distribution
Page 219 and 220:
Table 7.-Analysis of Methods of Dis
Page 221 and 222:
it! All C cases CA cases CB cases C
Page 223 and 224:
Stage of disposition ' Table 8.-Dis
Page 225 and 226:
Table 10.-Analysis of Methods of Di
Page 227 and 228:
Table 11A.—Analysis of Elections
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Table 13.-Final Outcome of Represen
Page 233 and 234:
Participating unions AFL-CIO v. AFL
Page 235 and 236:
Table 14.-Valid Votes Cast in Repre
Page 237 and 238:
Participating unions AFL-CIO v. AFL
Page 239 and 240:
Table 15.-Geographic Distribution o
Page 241 and 242:
144 0 Table 16.-Industrial Distribu
Page 243 and 244:
1.) LA, iv Table 17.-Size of Units
Page 245 and 246:
Table 18.-Distribution of Unfair La
Page 247 and 248:
Table 19.-Litigation for Enforcemen
Page 249 and 250:
Table 20.—Injunction Litigation U
Page 251:
show all

1 - National Labor Relations Board

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?