1 - National Labor Relations Board
1 - National Labor Relations Board
1 - National Labor Relations Board
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Unfair <strong>Labor</strong> Practices 103<br />
was a neutral powerless to resolve the underlying dispute. It<br />
pointed out that the decision to invoke the regulation was not<br />
a unilateral one but rather one in which the employer association<br />
representing the steamship lines and their agents had participated.<br />
The employers were, in fact, the direct beneficiaries of the<br />
action taken by the port authority, as it eliminated the cost to<br />
the employer of the clerk crews otherwise maintained and reduced<br />
to a predictable minimum the costs to the employers after<br />
expiration of the free-time period for claiming the cargo. Under<br />
these circumstances the <strong>Board</strong> dismissed the complaint, concluding<br />
that the union "had a lawful work preservation object in<br />
attempting to retain for its members clerical work theretofore<br />
performed by them and of which they were summarily deprived<br />
by their employer, acting in concert with the port authority and<br />
others."<br />
2. Permissible Primary Activity<br />
The recurrent problem of determining what union activity<br />
within the ambit of clauses (i) or (ii) of section 8(b) (4) is<br />
nonetheless permissible because it is primary activity not motivated<br />
by a prohibited object, was faced by the <strong>Board</strong> in several<br />
contexts. The circumstances which satisfy the requirement of<br />
the presence of the "primary employer" at a common situs to<br />
render picketing there legitimate activity were further defined<br />
by the <strong>Board</strong> in the Auburndale Freezer case. 83 The picketing by<br />
employees of the primary employer at the site of an independently<br />
owned and operated freezer warehouse where the primary employer<br />
delivered his product for storage until picked up by<br />
commercial carriers was found in that case to be legitimate<br />
picketing in conformance with the Moore Dry Dock standards,<br />
even though no products were being delivered at the time of the<br />
picketing due to the strike. Although the freezer warehouse served<br />
many other employers, the <strong>Board</strong> found the primary employer<br />
constantly present there in view of his long use of the warehouse,<br />
his long-term reservation of a large storage capacity, and<br />
the fact that his products were then stored at the warehouse,<br />
were regularly brought to the warehouse by his employees, and<br />
were shipped by the warehouse only in accordance with instructions<br />
from him."<br />
"United Steelworkers of America, Loc. 6991 (Auburndale Freezer Corp.), 177 NLRB No 108.<br />
84 Members Fanning, Jenkins, and Zagoria for the majority Chairman McCulloch and<br />
Member Brown, dissenting, would not base a finding of the "presence" of the primary<br />
employer at a situs upon the simple presence of that primary employer's product, pursuant<br />
to an established business relationship, on the separate premises of a neutral employer independently<br />
engaged in another business.<br />
384-517 0 - 70 - 5