07.02.2015 Views

1 - National Labor Relations Board

1 - National Labor Relations Board

1 - National Labor Relations Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Unfair <strong>Labor</strong> Practices 103<br />

was a neutral powerless to resolve the underlying dispute. It<br />

pointed out that the decision to invoke the regulation was not<br />

a unilateral one but rather one in which the employer association<br />

representing the steamship lines and their agents had participated.<br />

The employers were, in fact, the direct beneficiaries of the<br />

action taken by the port authority, as it eliminated the cost to<br />

the employer of the clerk crews otherwise maintained and reduced<br />

to a predictable minimum the costs to the employers after<br />

expiration of the free-time period for claiming the cargo. Under<br />

these circumstances the <strong>Board</strong> dismissed the complaint, concluding<br />

that the union "had a lawful work preservation object in<br />

attempting to retain for its members clerical work theretofore<br />

performed by them and of which they were summarily deprived<br />

by their employer, acting in concert with the port authority and<br />

others."<br />

2. Permissible Primary Activity<br />

The recurrent problem of determining what union activity<br />

within the ambit of clauses (i) or (ii) of section 8(b) (4) is<br />

nonetheless permissible because it is primary activity not motivated<br />

by a prohibited object, was faced by the <strong>Board</strong> in several<br />

contexts. The circumstances which satisfy the requirement of<br />

the presence of the "primary employer" at a common situs to<br />

render picketing there legitimate activity were further defined<br />

by the <strong>Board</strong> in the Auburndale Freezer case. 83 The picketing by<br />

employees of the primary employer at the site of an independently<br />

owned and operated freezer warehouse where the primary employer<br />

delivered his product for storage until picked up by<br />

commercial carriers was found in that case to be legitimate<br />

picketing in conformance with the Moore Dry Dock standards,<br />

even though no products were being delivered at the time of the<br />

picketing due to the strike. Although the freezer warehouse served<br />

many other employers, the <strong>Board</strong> found the primary employer<br />

constantly present there in view of his long use of the warehouse,<br />

his long-term reservation of a large storage capacity, and<br />

the fact that his products were then stored at the warehouse,<br />

were regularly brought to the warehouse by his employees, and<br />

were shipped by the warehouse only in accordance with instructions<br />

from him."<br />

"United Steelworkers of America, Loc. 6991 (Auburndale Freezer Corp.), 177 NLRB No 108.<br />

84 Members Fanning, Jenkins, and Zagoria for the majority Chairman McCulloch and<br />

Member Brown, dissenting, would not base a finding of the "presence" of the primary<br />

employer at a situs upon the simple presence of that primary employer's product, pursuant<br />

to an established business relationship, on the separate premises of a neutral employer independently<br />

engaged in another business.<br />

384-517 0 - 70 - 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!