1 - National Labor Relations Board
1 - National Labor Relations Board
1 - National Labor Relations Board
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
52 Thirty-fourth Annual Report of the <strong>National</strong> <strong>Labor</strong> <strong>Relations</strong> <strong>Board</strong><br />
election based on conduct occurring prior to the filing of the<br />
petition, (2) that the assisted union could appear on the ballot<br />
and be certified if it won, and (3) that, if the assisted union<br />
was certified, no further action be taken to enforce the <strong>Board</strong>'s<br />
order on the 8(a) (2) violations. In the exercise of its discretion<br />
to approve the waiver, the <strong>Board</strong> concluded that under the<br />
circumstances a further delay in affording the employees an<br />
opportunity to select a representative was not warrented. Relying.<br />
as a precedent for its action on the Carlson Furniture case,24<br />
where it accepted a written request to proceed where the remedy<br />
for the 8(a) (2) violation merely required the withdrawing and<br />
withholding of recognition, the <strong>Board</strong> concluded that the dues<br />
disgorgement requirement of the remedy in this case did not<br />
require a different result. It pointed out that neither the waiver<br />
nor the results of an election if directed would affect the <strong>Board</strong>'s<br />
right to enforcement of the disgorgement remedy and that its<br />
acceptance of the request to proceed should not be so construed.<br />
As the election thus could not affect in any manner the reimbursement<br />
of moneys collected under the illegal contract, the<br />
<strong>Board</strong> rejected a contention that the petitioning unions could<br />
claim that the dues disgorgement would follow only if the petitioning<br />
unions, and not the assisted one, were selected by the<br />
employees. It emphasized that the "specified condition for a request<br />
to proceed as it relates to the concurrent complaint case<br />
is the affirmative indication by the petitioner-charging party of<br />
a willingness to withdraw an 8(a) (2) assistance charge in the<br />
event the subject union is certified. Approval of any withdrawal<br />
remains in the <strong>Board</strong>'s discretion. . . ." 25<br />
C. Units Appropriate for Bargaining<br />
1. Single-Location Units in Multiple-Location Enterprises<br />
The appropriateness of a unit of employees at a single location<br />
in a retail store chain or other multiple-location enterprise<br />
was again 26 an issue in cases considered by the <strong>Board</strong> during the<br />
report year. In the May Department Store case, 27 the petitioning<br />
union sought separate units at each of 3 of the employer's 12<br />
24 157 NLRB 851 (1966).<br />
22 Chairman McCulloch and Members Brown, Jenkins, and Zagoria for the majority. Member<br />
Fanning, dissenting, would not grant a waiver unless the results of the election would dispose<br />
of the entire proceeding, which it did not do in this case.<br />
24 See Thirty-third Annual Report (1968) , pp. 51-53; Thirty-second Annual Report (1967),<br />
pp. 58-61.<br />
27 175 NLRB No. 97.