07.02.2015 Views

1 - National Labor Relations Board

1 - National Labor Relations Board

1 - National Labor Relations Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Representation Cases 49<br />

In Missouri Beef Packers, 15 however, the <strong>Board</strong> dismissed an<br />

international union's petition to amend certain certifications of<br />

an independent union by substituting the name of the international<br />

on grounds that the independent had affiliated with it.<br />

The <strong>Board</strong> concluded that an amendment of the certification was<br />

not appropriate, since a question concerning representation was<br />

presented. Although the independent's officials had initially agreed<br />

to the affiliation, they repudiated it well before the vote by the<br />

union membership for affiliation, and continued to oppose it<br />

thereafter. Distinguishing Equipment Manufacturing, supra,<br />

where it found no survival of the old independent after the<br />

affiliation, the <strong>Board</strong> found that under these circumstances there<br />

was no guaranty of continuity of representation since the certified<br />

labor organization remained a functioning, viable entity opposing<br />

the amendment. In its view, granting the amendment would have<br />

abridged the Act's requirement that the employees select their<br />

own bargaining representative.16<br />

The disaffiliation of a local union from one international, and<br />

its merger with a local union of another international, was found<br />

by the <strong>Board</strong> not to raise a question concerning representation<br />

of the affected employees under the circumstances present in the<br />

Gate City Optical case." It was the employee's avowed purpose in<br />

effecting the change in affiliation, and causing their newly designated<br />

representative to file a petition for an election, to circumvent<br />

the existing contract and enable their new representative<br />

to negotiate a more favorable one.<br />

The employer conceded the formal defunctness of the certified<br />

incumbent and the majority status of the local with which it had<br />

merged, and expressed a willingness to recognize the petitioner<br />

as representative of the unit employees if it assumed the incumbent's<br />

unexpired contract. The <strong>Board</strong> found, however, that the<br />

incumbent was not defunct in a substantive sense—particularly<br />

where the formal defunctness was "created as a stratagem to<br />

achieve an end inimical to policies of the Act"—and had not<br />

changed its identity to any significant extent. It pointed out that<br />

an election at this time would disrupt conditions already stabilized<br />

by the existing contract. In view of the fact that the petitioning<br />

union was clearly entitled to recognition, which the em-<br />

"175 NLRB No. 179.<br />

" Members Fanning and Brown for the majority Member Zagoria, concurring in the result,<br />

would find the affiliation vote inadequate in any event, since a number of employees sufficient to<br />

have affected the outcome of the election were disenfianchised because not members of the<br />

independent.<br />

" Gate City Optical Co., A Div. of Cole Natl. Corp., 175 NLRB No. 172.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!