1 - National Labor Relations Board
1 - National Labor Relations Board
1 - National Labor Relations Board
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Representation Cases 49<br />
In Missouri Beef Packers, 15 however, the <strong>Board</strong> dismissed an<br />
international union's petition to amend certain certifications of<br />
an independent union by substituting the name of the international<br />
on grounds that the independent had affiliated with it.<br />
The <strong>Board</strong> concluded that an amendment of the certification was<br />
not appropriate, since a question concerning representation was<br />
presented. Although the independent's officials had initially agreed<br />
to the affiliation, they repudiated it well before the vote by the<br />
union membership for affiliation, and continued to oppose it<br />
thereafter. Distinguishing Equipment Manufacturing, supra,<br />
where it found no survival of the old independent after the<br />
affiliation, the <strong>Board</strong> found that under these circumstances there<br />
was no guaranty of continuity of representation since the certified<br />
labor organization remained a functioning, viable entity opposing<br />
the amendment. In its view, granting the amendment would have<br />
abridged the Act's requirement that the employees select their<br />
own bargaining representative.16<br />
The disaffiliation of a local union from one international, and<br />
its merger with a local union of another international, was found<br />
by the <strong>Board</strong> not to raise a question concerning representation<br />
of the affected employees under the circumstances present in the<br />
Gate City Optical case." It was the employee's avowed purpose in<br />
effecting the change in affiliation, and causing their newly designated<br />
representative to file a petition for an election, to circumvent<br />
the existing contract and enable their new representative<br />
to negotiate a more favorable one.<br />
The employer conceded the formal defunctness of the certified<br />
incumbent and the majority status of the local with which it had<br />
merged, and expressed a willingness to recognize the petitioner<br />
as representative of the unit employees if it assumed the incumbent's<br />
unexpired contract. The <strong>Board</strong> found, however, that the<br />
incumbent was not defunct in a substantive sense—particularly<br />
where the formal defunctness was "created as a stratagem to<br />
achieve an end inimical to policies of the Act"—and had not<br />
changed its identity to any significant extent. It pointed out that<br />
an election at this time would disrupt conditions already stabilized<br />
by the existing contract. In view of the fact that the petitioning<br />
union was clearly entitled to recognition, which the em-<br />
"175 NLRB No. 179.<br />
" Members Fanning and Brown for the majority Member Zagoria, concurring in the result,<br />
would find the affiliation vote inadequate in any event, since a number of employees sufficient to<br />
have affected the outcome of the election were disenfianchised because not members of the<br />
independent.<br />
" Gate City Optical Co., A Div. of Cole Natl. Corp., 175 NLRB No. 172.