1 - National Labor Relations Board

More documents

Recommendations

Info

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Members of the <strong>Board</strong> FRANK W. MCCULLOCH, Chairman JOHN H. FANNING GERALD A. BROWN HOWARD JENKINS, JR. SAM ZAGORIA Chief Counsels to <strong>Board</strong> Members ARTHUR LEFF WILLIAM C. BAISINGER HARRY M. LEET RALPH WINKLER MELVIN J. WELLES OGDEN W. FIELDS, Executive Secretary WILLIAM FELDESMAN, Solicitor GEORGE BOKAT, Chief Trial Examiner , THOMAS W. MILLER, JR., Director of Information Office of the General Counsel ARNOLD ORDMAN, General Counsel H. STEPHAN GORDON DOMINICK L. MANOLI Associate General Counsel Associate General Counsel Division of Operations Division of Law CLARENCE S. WRIGHT, Director, Division of Administration P ROPERTY OF THE UNITED STATES GO VERNMENT N ATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 111
Page 1 and 2: TMR.TY-FOURM ANNUAL REPORT
Page 6: LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL NATIONAL LABO
Page 9 and 10: viii Table of Contents CHAPTER D. C
Page 12 and 13: I Operations in Fiscal Year 1969 1.
Page 14 and 15: Operations in Fiscal Year 1969 3 Ch
Page 16 and 17: Operations in Fiscal Year 1969 5 de
Page 18 and 19: Operations in Fiscal Year 1969 7 Fo
Page 20 and 21: CoperationsinFiscallrear1969 9 Char
Page 22 and 23: Operations in Fiscal Year 1969 11
Page 24 and 25: ' Operations in Fiscal Year 1969 13
Page 26 and 27: Operations in Fiscal Year 1969 15 r
Page 28 and 29: Operations in Fiscal Year 1969 17 T
Page 30 and 31: Operations in Fiscal Year 1969 19 o
Page 32 and 33: Operations in Fiscal Year 1969 21 1
Page 34 and 35: Operations in Fiscal Year 1969 23 s
Page 36 and 37: Operations in Fiscal Year 1969 25 g
Page 38 and 39: Operations in Fiscal Year 1969 27 E
Page 40 and 41: Jurisdiction of the Board 29 allege
Page 42 and 43: Jurisdiction of the Board 31 pital
Page 44 and 45: III Effect of Concurrent Arbitratio
Page 46 and 47: Effect of Concurrent Arbitration Pr
Page 48 and 49: Effect of Concurrent Arbitration Pr
Page 50 and 51: Iv Board Procedure A. Multiple Liti
Page 52 and 53: Board Procedure 41 was inadmissible
Page 54 and 55:
Board Procedure 43 the backpay proc
Page 56 and 57:
Representation Cases 45 hearing bef
Page 58 and 59:
Representation Cases 47 move to the
Page 60 and 61:
Representation Cases 49 In Missouri
Page 62 and 63:
Representation Cases 51 contentions
Page 64 and 65:
Representation Cases 53 branch depa
Page 66 and 67:
Representation Cases 55 division. I
Page 68 and 69:
Representation Cases 57 scale, had
Page 70 and 71:
Representation Cases 59 In a case 4
Page 72 and 73:
Representation Cases 61 not also ha
Page 74 and 75:
Representation Cases 63 brated them
Page 76 and 77:
Representation Cases 65 eligibility
Page 78 and 79:
Representation Cases 67 During the
Page 80 and 81:
Representation Cases 69 a letter ex
Page 82 and 83:
Representation Cases 71 vidual empl
Page 84 and 85:
Unfair Labor Practices 73 tions of
Page 86 and 87:
Unfair Labor Practices 75 the disch
Page 88 and 89:
Unfair Labor Practices 77 cumstance
Page 90 and 91:
Unfair Labor Practices 79 2. Withdr
Page 92 and 93:
Unfair Labor Practices 81 had one b
Page 94 and 95:
Unfair Labor Practices 83 were not
Page 96 and 97:
Unfair Labor Practices 85 of the co
Page 98 and 99:
Unfair Labor Practices 87 relevant
Page 100 and 101:
Unfair Labor Practices 89 that the
Page 102 and 103:
Unfair Labor Practices 91 tive was
Page 104 and 105:
Unfair Labor Practices 93 Board rej
Page 106 and 107:
Unfair Labor Practices 95 of the tr
Page 108 and 109:
Unfair Labor Practices 97 in a work
Page 110 and 111:
Unfair Labor Practices 99 and in fa
Page 112 and 113:
Unfair Labor Practices 101 engaged
Page 114 and 115:
Unfair Labor Practices 103 was a ne
Page 116 and 117:
Unfair Labor Practices 105 pressure
Page 118 and 119:
Unfair Labor Practices 107 entangle
Page 120 and 121:
Unfair Labor Practices 109 Of parti
Page 122 and 123:
VII Supreme Court During fiscal yea
Page 124 and 125:
Supreme Court 113 rulemaking proced
Page 126 and 127:
Supreme Court 115 been necessary to
Page 128 and 129:
times had agreed to raise the ceili
Page 130 and 131:
Enforcement Litigation 119 In anoth
Page 132 and 133:
Enforcement Litigation 121 unfair l
Page 134 and 135:
Enforcement Litigation 123 resoluti
Page 136 and 137:
Enforcement Litigation 125 an appro
Page 138 and 139:
Enforcement Litigation 127 Board's
Page 140 and 141:
Enforcement Litigation 129 party ag
Page 142 and 143:
Enforcement Litigation 131 where an
Page 144 and 145:
Enforcement Litigation 133 the case
Page 146 and 147:
Enforcement Litigation 135 In one,
Page 148 and 149:
Enforcement Litigation 137 cerning
Page 150 and 151:
Enforcement Litigation 139 that the
Page 152 and 153:
Enforcement Litigation 141 ings bef
Page 154 and 155:
Enforcement Litigation 143 sustaine
Page 156 and 157:
Enforcement Litigation 145 upheld t
Page 158 and 159:
Enforcement Litigation 147 were not
Page 160 and 161:
Enforcement Litigation 149 autonomy
Page 162 and 163:
Enforcement Litigation 151 ness wit
Page 164 and 165:
Enforcement Litigation 153 tamn wor
Page 166 and 167:
Enforcement Litigation 155 over, th
Page 168 and 169:
Enforcement Litigation 157 tuating
Page 170 and 171:
Enforcement Litigation 159 the cour
Page 172 and 173:
In junction Litigation 161 union, i
Page 174 and 175:
Injunction Litigation 163 faith cha
Page 176 and 177:
Injunction Litigation 165 of the Ac
Page 178 and 179:
Injunction Litigation 167 the valid
Page 180 and 181:
x Contempt Litigation-Fiscal 1969 D
Page 182 and 183:
XI Special and Miscellaneous Litiga
Page 184 and 185:
Special and Miscellaneous Litigatio
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Index of Cases Discussed A A Electr
Page 192 and 193:
Index of Cases Discussed 181 Page F
Page 194 and 195:
Index of Cases Discussed 183 Page M
Page 196 and 197:
Index of Cases Discussed 185 Page S
Page 198 and 199:
APPENDIX A Statistical Tables for F
Page 200 and 201:
Appendix A 189 tamed in the charge
Page 202 and 203:
Appendix A 191 Formal Agreement (in
Page 204 and 205:
Appendix A 193 CE: A charge that ei
Page 206 and 207:
Appendix A 195 SUBJECT INDEX TO ANN
Page 208 and 209:
Appendix A 197 Table 1A.-Unfair Lab
Page 210 and 211:
Appendix A 199 Table 2.-Types of Un
Page 212 and 213:
Appendix A 201 Table 3B.—Formal A
Page 214 and 215:
B. By number of employees affected:
Page 216 and 217:
struments 215 119 90 21 4 2 1 1 88
Page 218 and 219:
District of Columbia Virginia West
Page 220 and 221:
Trial examiner's decision Board dec
Page 222 and 223:
Appendix A 211 Table 7A.—Analysis
Page 224 and 225:
Table 9.—Disposition by Stage of
Page 226 and 227:
Appendix A 215 Table 10A.-Analysis
Page 228 and 229:
Appendix A 217 Table 11B.-Represent
Page 230 and 231:
Table 12.—Results of Union-Shop D
Page 232 and 233:
AFL-CIO v. Natl. v. Local v. Local
Page 234 and 235:
AFL-CIO v. Natl AFL-CIO v. Local Na
Page 236 and 237:
AFL-CIO v. AFL-CIO v. Teamsters v.
Page 238 and 239:
AFL-CIO Teamsters Other national un
Page 240 and 241:
Delaware Maryland District of Colum
Page 242 and 243:
Professional, scientific, and contr
Page 244 and 245:
,' , Appendix A 233 M0VM0. ,.t00000
Page 246 and 247:
Appendix A 235 COC■ $04, ,p COCOW
Page 248 and 249:
Table 19A.-Proceeding Decided by Ci
Page 250 and 251:
Table 21.—Miscellaneous Litigatio
show all

1 - National Labor Relations Board

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?