1 - National Labor Relations Board
1 - National Labor Relations Board
1 - National Labor Relations Board
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Special and Miscellaneous Litigation 177<br />
against State court proceedings 20 is not applicable when suit is<br />
brought by the United States. However, the court concluded that,<br />
since no formal complaint had been issued, the jurisdiction of<br />
the <strong>Board</strong> had not been invoked, and no injunction was necessary<br />
to protect the <strong>Board</strong>'s jurisdiction. Accordingly, the <strong>Board</strong>'s<br />
suit was dismissed.21<br />
D. Status of Collective-Bargaining Agreement in<br />
Bankruptcy<br />
In one case, 22 the trustee in bankruptcy of a bankrupt company<br />
sought to enjoin the <strong>Board</strong> from proceeding further with a complaint<br />
alleging that he had engaged in unfair labor practices<br />
by unilaterally reducing wages and the work force and recalling<br />
employees without regard to seniority. The <strong>Board</strong>, on the other<br />
hand, sought to compel the trustee to impound enough funds to<br />
satisfy any backpay awards which the <strong>Board</strong> might make in<br />
the unfair labor practice proceeding. The district court denied<br />
relief to both sides. The trustee's contentions in his suit were<br />
that the administration of the backrupt company was within<br />
the exclusive jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court, and that the<br />
<strong>Board</strong> was attempting to relitigate an issue which the court<br />
had already decided when it held, in a suit by the union for<br />
breach of contract," that the trustee was entitled to treat the<br />
employer's collective-bargaining agreement with the union as<br />
an executory contract which could be rejected as provided by<br />
section 70b of the Bankruptcy Act. The court, however, held<br />
that it had no jurisdiction to enjoin the <strong>Board</strong> from proceeding,<br />
even where the <strong>Board</strong> was alleged to be acting in excess of its<br />
jurisdiction. It recognized that the <strong>Board</strong> has exclusive jurisdiction<br />
over unfair labor practices, and that trustees in bankruptcy<br />
and receivers are expressly included in the definition of<br />
"person" in section 2(1) of the Act, and hence are subject to<br />
the <strong>Board</strong>'s jurisdiction, notwithstanding the fact that they are<br />
officers of the bankruptcy court. A finding by the <strong>Board</strong> that<br />
the trustee's actions constituted unfair labor practices would<br />
not necessarily conflict with the court's prior decision ; the court<br />
had held only that the trustee's rejection of the contract was<br />
not a breach thereof. The union's complaint had not alleged<br />
20 28 U S.C. §2283 provides : "A court of the United States may not grant an injunction to<br />
stay proceedings in a state court except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where<br />
necessary in aid of its jurisdiction or to protect or effectuate its judgments"<br />
21 The <strong>Board</strong> has appealed this decision to the Fifth Circuit.<br />
22 Durand (Turney Wood Products) v. N.L.R.B., 70 LRRM 2651 (D.C.Ark.).<br />
"Carpenters Local 2746 v. Turney Wood Products, 280 F.Supp. 143 (D.C.Ark.).