07.02.2015 Views

1 - National Labor Relations Board

1 - National Labor Relations Board

1 - National Labor Relations Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Special and Miscellaneous Litigation 177<br />

against State court proceedings 20 is not applicable when suit is<br />

brought by the United States. However, the court concluded that,<br />

since no formal complaint had been issued, the jurisdiction of<br />

the <strong>Board</strong> had not been invoked, and no injunction was necessary<br />

to protect the <strong>Board</strong>'s jurisdiction. Accordingly, the <strong>Board</strong>'s<br />

suit was dismissed.21<br />

D. Status of Collective-Bargaining Agreement in<br />

Bankruptcy<br />

In one case, 22 the trustee in bankruptcy of a bankrupt company<br />

sought to enjoin the <strong>Board</strong> from proceeding further with a complaint<br />

alleging that he had engaged in unfair labor practices<br />

by unilaterally reducing wages and the work force and recalling<br />

employees without regard to seniority. The <strong>Board</strong>, on the other<br />

hand, sought to compel the trustee to impound enough funds to<br />

satisfy any backpay awards which the <strong>Board</strong> might make in<br />

the unfair labor practice proceeding. The district court denied<br />

relief to both sides. The trustee's contentions in his suit were<br />

that the administration of the backrupt company was within<br />

the exclusive jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court, and that the<br />

<strong>Board</strong> was attempting to relitigate an issue which the court<br />

had already decided when it held, in a suit by the union for<br />

breach of contract," that the trustee was entitled to treat the<br />

employer's collective-bargaining agreement with the union as<br />

an executory contract which could be rejected as provided by<br />

section 70b of the Bankruptcy Act. The court, however, held<br />

that it had no jurisdiction to enjoin the <strong>Board</strong> from proceeding,<br />

even where the <strong>Board</strong> was alleged to be acting in excess of its<br />

jurisdiction. It recognized that the <strong>Board</strong> has exclusive jurisdiction<br />

over unfair labor practices, and that trustees in bankruptcy<br />

and receivers are expressly included in the definition of<br />

"person" in section 2(1) of the Act, and hence are subject to<br />

the <strong>Board</strong>'s jurisdiction, notwithstanding the fact that they are<br />

officers of the bankruptcy court. A finding by the <strong>Board</strong> that<br />

the trustee's actions constituted unfair labor practices would<br />

not necessarily conflict with the court's prior decision ; the court<br />

had held only that the trustee's rejection of the contract was<br />

not a breach thereof. The union's complaint had not alleged<br />

20 28 U S.C. §2283 provides : "A court of the United States may not grant an injunction to<br />

stay proceedings in a state court except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where<br />

necessary in aid of its jurisdiction or to protect or effectuate its judgments"<br />

21 The <strong>Board</strong> has appealed this decision to the Fifth Circuit.<br />

22 Durand (Turney Wood Products) v. N.L.R.B., 70 LRRM 2651 (D.C.Ark.).<br />

"Carpenters Local 2746 v. Turney Wood Products, 280 F.Supp. 143 (D.C.Ark.).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!