07.02.2015 Views

1 - National Labor Relations Board

1 - National Labor Relations Board

1 - National Labor Relations Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

II<br />

Jurisdiction of the <strong>Board</strong><br />

The <strong>Board</strong>'s jurisdiction under the Act, as to both representation<br />

proceedings and unfair labor practices, extends to all enterprises<br />

whose operations "affect" interstate or foreign commerce.1<br />

However, Congress and the courts 2 have recognized the <strong>Board</strong>'s<br />

discretion to limit the exercise of its broad statutory jurisdiction<br />

to enterprises whose effect on commerce is, in the <strong>Board</strong>'s opinion,<br />

substantial—such discretion being subject only to the statutory<br />

limitation 3 that jurisdiction may not be declined where it would<br />

have been asserted under the <strong>Board</strong>'s self-imposed jurisdictional<br />

standards prevailing on August 1, 1959. 4 Accordingly, before the<br />

<strong>Board</strong> takes cognizance of a case, it must first be established that<br />

it has legal or statutory jurisdiction ; i.e., that the business operations<br />

involved "affect" commerce within the meaning of the Act.<br />

It must also appear that the business operations meet the <strong>Board</strong>'s<br />

applicable jurisdictional standards.5<br />

The following cases among those decided by the <strong>Board</strong> during<br />

the report year involving issues concerning its jurisdiction are<br />

of note.<br />

A. Jurisdiction Over Dispute Involving State Agencies<br />

In the City of Juneau case 6 the <strong>Board</strong> held that it had, and<br />

should assert, jurisdiction in a proceeding where a union was<br />

i See secs 9(c) and 10(a) of the Act and also definitions of "commerce" and "affecting commerce"<br />

set forth in secs. 2(6) and (7), respectively. Under sec. 2(2), the term "employer"<br />

does not Include the United States or any wholly owned Government corporation, any<br />

Federal Reserve Bank, any State or political subdivision, any nonprofit hospital, any person<br />

subject to the Railway <strong>Labor</strong> Act, or any labor organization other than when acting<br />

as an employer. "Agricultural laborers" and others excluded from the term "employee"<br />

as defined by sec. 2(3) of the Act are discussed, inter aho, in the Twenty-ninth Annual<br />

Report (1964), p p . 52-55, and Thirty-first Annual Report (1966), p. 36.<br />

2 See Twenty-fifth Annual Report (1960), p 18.<br />

3 See sec. 14(c) (1) of the Act.<br />

' These self-imposed standards are primarily expressed in terms of the gross dollar volume of<br />

business in question.<br />

5 While a mere showing that the <strong>Board</strong>'s gross dollar volume standards are met is ordinarily<br />

insufficient to establish legal or statutory jurisdiction, no further proof of legal or statutory<br />

jurisdiction is necessary where it is shown that its "outflow-inflow" standards are<br />

met. Twenty-fifth Annual Report (1960), pp. 19-20. But see Sioux Valley Empire Electric<br />

Assn., 122 NLRB 92 (1958), as to the treatment of local public utilities<br />

a Local 16, Intl. Longshoremen & Warehousemen's Union, 176 NLRB No. 121.<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!