1 - National Labor Relations Board
1 - National Labor Relations Board
1 - National Labor Relations Board
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
II<br />
Jurisdiction of the <strong>Board</strong><br />
The <strong>Board</strong>'s jurisdiction under the Act, as to both representation<br />
proceedings and unfair labor practices, extends to all enterprises<br />
whose operations "affect" interstate or foreign commerce.1<br />
However, Congress and the courts 2 have recognized the <strong>Board</strong>'s<br />
discretion to limit the exercise of its broad statutory jurisdiction<br />
to enterprises whose effect on commerce is, in the <strong>Board</strong>'s opinion,<br />
substantial—such discretion being subject only to the statutory<br />
limitation 3 that jurisdiction may not be declined where it would<br />
have been asserted under the <strong>Board</strong>'s self-imposed jurisdictional<br />
standards prevailing on August 1, 1959. 4 Accordingly, before the<br />
<strong>Board</strong> takes cognizance of a case, it must first be established that<br />
it has legal or statutory jurisdiction ; i.e., that the business operations<br />
involved "affect" commerce within the meaning of the Act.<br />
It must also appear that the business operations meet the <strong>Board</strong>'s<br />
applicable jurisdictional standards.5<br />
The following cases among those decided by the <strong>Board</strong> during<br />
the report year involving issues concerning its jurisdiction are<br />
of note.<br />
A. Jurisdiction Over Dispute Involving State Agencies<br />
In the City of Juneau case 6 the <strong>Board</strong> held that it had, and<br />
should assert, jurisdiction in a proceeding where a union was<br />
i See secs 9(c) and 10(a) of the Act and also definitions of "commerce" and "affecting commerce"<br />
set forth in secs. 2(6) and (7), respectively. Under sec. 2(2), the term "employer"<br />
does not Include the United States or any wholly owned Government corporation, any<br />
Federal Reserve Bank, any State or political subdivision, any nonprofit hospital, any person<br />
subject to the Railway <strong>Labor</strong> Act, or any labor organization other than when acting<br />
as an employer. "Agricultural laborers" and others excluded from the term "employee"<br />
as defined by sec. 2(3) of the Act are discussed, inter aho, in the Twenty-ninth Annual<br />
Report (1964), p p . 52-55, and Thirty-first Annual Report (1966), p. 36.<br />
2 See Twenty-fifth Annual Report (1960), p 18.<br />
3 See sec. 14(c) (1) of the Act.<br />
' These self-imposed standards are primarily expressed in terms of the gross dollar volume of<br />
business in question.<br />
5 While a mere showing that the <strong>Board</strong>'s gross dollar volume standards are met is ordinarily<br />
insufficient to establish legal or statutory jurisdiction, no further proof of legal or statutory<br />
jurisdiction is necessary where it is shown that its "outflow-inflow" standards are<br />
met. Twenty-fifth Annual Report (1960), pp. 19-20. But see Sioux Valley Empire Electric<br />
Assn., 122 NLRB 92 (1958), as to the treatment of local public utilities<br />
a Local 16, Intl. Longshoremen & Warehousemen's Union, 176 NLRB No. 121.<br />
28