Hand hygiene.pdf
Hand hygiene.pdf
Hand hygiene.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ability, data will be credible, and compliance trends can be monitored over time. Examples<br />
of hand <strong>hygiene</strong> compliance monitoring tools can be obtained from reference 693 or at:<br />
www.hand<strong>hygiene</strong>.org/downloads/HHMonitoring%20Tool.doc.<br />
There have been some attempts to improve hand <strong>hygiene</strong> by empowering patients 694 . The<br />
value of patient involvement has been assessed by McGuckin 569,695 . In two studies, patients<br />
were encouraged to find out if HCWs had washed their hands before patient contact. These<br />
studies recommended that patients should be empowered to take responsibility for their<br />
health care, including infection control. Patient monitoring of hand <strong>hygiene</strong> compliance<br />
is not well documented, however, and has never been objectively evaluated 696 . Patients<br />
may not feel comfortable monitoring an HCW’s compliance with hand <strong>hygiene</strong> 697,698 .<br />
Furthermore, patient empowerment is not possible for the critically ill.<br />
Self-assessment by HCWs can be carried out. It has been demonstrated, however, that<br />
self-reports of compliance do not correlate well with compliance actually measured by<br />
direct observation, and self-assessment tends to overestimate compliance with hand<br />
<strong>hygiene</strong> 153,155,507,508,518,545 .<br />
1.2 INDIRECT MONITORING<br />
Indirect monitoring includes counting used paper hand towels 699 , monitoring the amount<br />
of alcohol-based handrub or liquid soap used 261,262,360,363,489,535,568,592 , or estimating the<br />
required amount using a computerized database of nursing activities 591 . These methods<br />
are not as consuming of time and resources as direct observation, but can be affected<br />
by a number of biases, such as lack of adjustment for patient case-mix and workload 583 .<br />
Some studies 261,262,360 have shown that the consumption of products used for hand <strong>hygiene</strong><br />
correlated with observed hand <strong>hygiene</strong> compliance; thus, the use of this measure as a surrogate<br />
for monitoring hand <strong>hygiene</strong> practices deserves further validation. Other studies found<br />
that feedback by measuring soap and paper towel levels did not have an impact on hand<br />
<strong>hygiene</strong> 567,699 .<br />
1.3 ELECTRONIC MONITORING<br />
The use of sinks in patient rooms and in hospital lavatories can be monitored electronically.<br />
A recent study 489 tested an electronic monitoring system that monitored entry and exit<br />
into patient rooms and tracked the use of sinks and hand <strong>hygiene</strong> materials. A computer<br />
system linked each entry and exit with the presence or absence of a hand <strong>hygiene</strong> activity.<br />
Although useful for assessing general personal <strong>hygiene</strong>, these systems are not appropriate<br />
for measuring hand <strong>hygiene</strong> compliance with patient care, as such devices do not take into<br />
account the number of hand <strong>hygiene</strong> opportunities. Table III.1.1 lists the advantages and<br />
disadvantages of direct and indirect monitoring of hand <strong>hygiene</strong> compliance.<br />
These guidelines include recommendations relating to the wearing of rings, wrist watches,<br />
bracelets, nail polish and artificial nails (see Part I, Section 20). Monitoring adherence to<br />
these policies can also involve direct and indirect observation, self-assessment and patient<br />
assessment, though little work has been carried out to assess the validity or correlation of<br />
these monitoring methods in terms of infection prevention.