Hand hygiene.pdf
Hand hygiene.pdf
Hand hygiene.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure l.20.2: Blood safety: crucial steps for hand <strong>hygiene</strong> action<br />
* <strong>Hand</strong> <strong>hygiene</strong> before and after the procedure.<br />
** Clean non-sterile gloves.<br />
20.4 JEWELLERY<br />
Several studies have shown that skin underneath rings is more heavily colonized than<br />
comparable areas of skin on fingers without rings 652-654 . A study by Hoffman and colleagues<br />
653 found that 40% of nurses harboured Gram-negative bacilli such as E. cloacae,<br />
Klebsiella spp., and Acinetobacter spp. on skin under rings and that some nurses carried<br />
the same organism under their rings for months. In one study involving more than 60 ICU<br />
nurses, multivariable analysis revealed that rings were the only significant risk factor for<br />
carriage of Gram-negative bacilli and S. aureus and that the organism bioburden recovered<br />
correlated with the number of rings worn 655 . Another study showed a stepwise increased<br />
risk of contamination with S. aureus, Gram negative bacilli, or Candida spp. as the number<br />
of rings worn increased 656 .<br />
A survey of knowledge and beliefs regarding nosocomial infections and jewellery showed<br />
that neonatal ICU HCWs were not aware of the relationship between bacterial hand counts<br />
and rings, and did not believe rings increased the risk of nosocomial infections; 61% regularly<br />
wore at least one ring to work 639 .<br />
Whether the wearing of rings results in greater cross-transmission of pathogens is not<br />
known. Two studies found that mean bacterial colony counts on hands after handwashing<br />
were similar among individuals wearing rings and those not wearing rings 654,657 . Further<br />
studies are needed to establish if wearing rings results in a greater transmission of pathogens<br />
in health-care settings. Nevertheless, it is likely that poorly maintained (dirty) rings and<br />
jewellery might harbour microorganisms that could contaminate a body site with potential<br />
pathogens. Rings with sharp surfaces may puncture gloves. <strong>Hand</strong> <strong>hygiene</strong> practices are<br />
likely to be performed in a suboptimal way if voluminous rings or rings with sharp edges or<br />
surfaces are worn. Jewellery may also be a physical danger to either patients or the HCW<br />
during direct patient care, e.g. a necklace may be caught in equipment or bracelets may<br />
cause injury during patient handling.<br />
The consensus recommendation is to discourage the wearing of rings or other jewellery<br />
during health care; the use of a wedding ring for routine care may be acceptable, but<br />
in high-risk settings, such as the operating theatre, all rings or other jewellery should be