20.02.2015 Views

Hand hygiene.pdf

Hand hygiene.pdf

Hand hygiene.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tamination of smaller and well-defined areas on the skin in contrast to using whole hands.<br />

The method can be applied to traditional as well as “new” viruses such as caliciviruses 142 .<br />

ASTM E-2276 (fingerpad method for bacteria) 143<br />

This method is for testing handwash or handrub against bacteria. It is similar in design and<br />

application to the method (E-1838) 141 described above for working with viruses.<br />

ASTM E-2011 (whole hand method for viruses) 144<br />

In this method, the entire surface of both hands is contaminated with the test virus and<br />

the test handwash or handrub formulation is rubbed on them. The surface of both hands is<br />

eluted and the eluates assayed for viable virus.<br />

8.1.2 SURGICAL HAND PREPARATION (SEE TABLE I.8.1)<br />

In contrast to hygienic handwash or handrub, surgical hand preparation is directed<br />

against the resident hand flora. No artificial contamination of hands is used in any existing<br />

methods.<br />

CEN prEN 12791 (surgical hand preparation) 145<br />

This European prenorm is comparable with that described in EN 1500 except that the<br />

bactericidal effect of a product is tested: (i) on clean, not artificially contaminated hands; (ii)<br />

with 18–20 volunteers; (iii) using the split-hands model by Michaud, McGrath & Goss 146 to<br />

assess the immediate effect on one hand and a 3-hour effect (to detect a possible sustained<br />

effect) on the other, meanwhile gloved hand; (iv) in addition, a cross-over design is used; but<br />

contrary to hygienic hand antisepsis, the two experimental runs are separated by one week<br />

in order to enable regrowth of the resident flora; (v) the reference antisepsis procedure uses<br />

as many as 3-ml portions of n-propanol 60% (V/V) as are necessary to keep hands wet for 3<br />

minutes; (vi) the product is used according to manufacturer’s instructions with a maximum<br />

duration of 5 minutes; (vii) the requirements are that the immediate and 3-hour effects of a<br />

product must not be significantly inferior to those of the reference hand antisepsis; and (viii)<br />

if there is a claim for sustained activity, the product must demonstrate a significantly lower<br />

bacterial release than the reference at 3 hours.<br />

ASTM E-1115 (surgical hand scrub) 147<br />

This test method is designed to measure the reduction of microbial flora on the skin. It<br />

is intended for determining immediate and persistent microbial reductions, after single or<br />

repetitive treatments, or both. It may also be used to measure cumulative antimicrobial<br />

activity after repetitive treatments.<br />

In the USA, this method is required to assess the activity of surgical scrubs 135 . The TFM<br />

requires that formulations: (i) reduce the number of bacteria 1-log 10<br />

on each hand within 1<br />

minute of product use and that the bacterial cell count on each hand does not subsequently<br />

exceed baseline within 6 hours on day 1; (ii) produce a 2-log 10<br />

reduction in microbial flora<br />

on each hand within 1 minute of product use by the end of the second day of enumeration;<br />

and (iii) accomplish a 3-log 10<br />

reduction of microbial flora on each hand within 1 minute of<br />

product use by the end of the fifth day when compared to the established baseline 135 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!