Hand hygiene.pdf
Hand hygiene.pdf
Hand hygiene.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
tiple levels of influence; and (ii) behaviour both influences and is influenced by the social<br />
environment. Levels of influence for health-related behaviour and conditions include intrapersonal<br />
(individual), interpersonal, institutional and community factors 556 .<br />
Intrapersonal factors are individual characteristics that influence behaviour such as knowledge,<br />
attitudes, beliefs and personality traits.These factors are contained in social cognitive<br />
determinants 553 .<br />
Interpersonal factors include interpersonal processes and primary groups, i.e. family,<br />
friends and peers, who provide social identity, support and role definition. HCWs can be<br />
influenced by or are influential in their social environments. Behaviour is often influenced<br />
by peer group pressure, which indicates that responsibilities for each HCW’s individual<br />
group should be clearly recognized and defined.<br />
Community factors are social networks and norms that exist either formally or informally<br />
between individuals, groups and organizations. For example, in the hospital, the community<br />
level would be the ward 556 . Community-level models are frameworks for understanding<br />
how social systems function and change, and how communities and organizations can be<br />
activated. The conceptual framework of community organization models is based on social<br />
networks and support, focusing on the active participation and development of communities<br />
that can help evaluate and solve health problems. Public policy factors include local<br />
policies that regulate or support practices for disease prevention, control and management.<br />
16.1.3 APPLICATION OF SOCIAL SCIENCES TO THE INFECTION CONTROL FIELD<br />
Few studies have applied social sciences to assess HCWs’ behaviour related to infection<br />
control practices. Seto identified three fields of study in the behavioural sciences with<br />
some degree of relevance to the field of infection control: social psychology, organizational<br />
behaviour and consumer behaviour 551 . By applying a basic concept from each field, Seto<br />
and colleagues demonstrated the potential value of these theories to achieve staff compliance<br />
with different infection control policies in the hospital 551,556,557 .<br />
Social cognitive models have been applied to evaluate HCWs’ cognitive determinants<br />
towards hand <strong>hygiene</strong> behaviour 263,543,544,558,559 and are discussed in the next section (Part<br />
I, Section 16.2).<br />
Curry & Cole 560 applied the theory of Ecological Perspective and reported their experience<br />
in the medical and surgical ICUs in a large teaching hospital experiencing an increased<br />
patient colonization rate with VRE. Their intervention consisted of a multifaceted approach<br />
to the problem, considering the five levels of influence (individual, interpersonal, institutional,<br />
community and administrative factors). They implemented in-service education and<br />
developed references, policies and programmes directed at each of the five levels of influence.<br />
The Health Belief Model was employed for assessment of beliefs and intervention<br />
design. The authors observed a significant decrease in the number of patients with active<br />
surveillance cultures or clinical isolates positive for VRE within six months in both ICUs, and<br />
the benefit seemed to persist even two years later.<br />
16.2 BEHAVIOURAL ASPECTS OF HAND HYGIENE<br />
The inability over two decades to motivate HCW compliance with hand cleansing 539,561<br />
suggests that modifying hand <strong>hygiene</strong> behaviour is a complex task. Human health-related<br />
behaviour is the consequence of multiple influences from our biology, environment, education<br />
and culture. While these influences are usually interdependent, some have more<br />
effect than others; when the actions are unwise, they are usually the result of trade-offs with<br />
acknowledged or denied consequences. Thus, this complexity of individual, institutional