20.02.2015 Views

Hand hygiene.pdf

Hand hygiene.pdf

Hand hygiene.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tiple levels of influence; and (ii) behaviour both influences and is influenced by the social<br />

environment. Levels of influence for health-related behaviour and conditions include intrapersonal<br />

(individual), interpersonal, institutional and community factors 556 .<br />

Intrapersonal factors are individual characteristics that influence behaviour such as knowledge,<br />

attitudes, beliefs and personality traits.These factors are contained in social cognitive<br />

determinants 553 .<br />

Interpersonal factors include interpersonal processes and primary groups, i.e. family,<br />

friends and peers, who provide social identity, support and role definition. HCWs can be<br />

influenced by or are influential in their social environments. Behaviour is often influenced<br />

by peer group pressure, which indicates that responsibilities for each HCW’s individual<br />

group should be clearly recognized and defined.<br />

Community factors are social networks and norms that exist either formally or informally<br />

between individuals, groups and organizations. For example, in the hospital, the community<br />

level would be the ward 556 . Community-level models are frameworks for understanding<br />

how social systems function and change, and how communities and organizations can be<br />

activated. The conceptual framework of community organization models is based on social<br />

networks and support, focusing on the active participation and development of communities<br />

that can help evaluate and solve health problems. Public policy factors include local<br />

policies that regulate or support practices for disease prevention, control and management.<br />

16.1.3 APPLICATION OF SOCIAL SCIENCES TO THE INFECTION CONTROL FIELD<br />

Few studies have applied social sciences to assess HCWs’ behaviour related to infection<br />

control practices. Seto identified three fields of study in the behavioural sciences with<br />

some degree of relevance to the field of infection control: social psychology, organizational<br />

behaviour and consumer behaviour 551 . By applying a basic concept from each field, Seto<br />

and colleagues demonstrated the potential value of these theories to achieve staff compliance<br />

with different infection control policies in the hospital 551,556,557 .<br />

Social cognitive models have been applied to evaluate HCWs’ cognitive determinants<br />

towards hand <strong>hygiene</strong> behaviour 263,543,544,558,559 and are discussed in the next section (Part<br />

I, Section 16.2).<br />

Curry & Cole 560 applied the theory of Ecological Perspective and reported their experience<br />

in the medical and surgical ICUs in a large teaching hospital experiencing an increased<br />

patient colonization rate with VRE. Their intervention consisted of a multifaceted approach<br />

to the problem, considering the five levels of influence (individual, interpersonal, institutional,<br />

community and administrative factors). They implemented in-service education and<br />

developed references, policies and programmes directed at each of the five levels of influence.<br />

The Health Belief Model was employed for assessment of beliefs and intervention<br />

design. The authors observed a significant decrease in the number of patients with active<br />

surveillance cultures or clinical isolates positive for VRE within six months in both ICUs, and<br />

the benefit seemed to persist even two years later.<br />

16.2 BEHAVIOURAL ASPECTS OF HAND HYGIENE<br />

The inability over two decades to motivate HCW compliance with hand cleansing 539,561<br />

suggests that modifying hand <strong>hygiene</strong> behaviour is a complex task. Human health-related<br />

behaviour is the consequence of multiple influences from our biology, environment, education<br />

and culture. While these influences are usually interdependent, some have more<br />

effect than others; when the actions are unwise, they are usually the result of trade-offs with<br />

acknowledged or denied consequences. Thus, this complexity of individual, institutional

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!