Hand hygiene.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

276. Thomas L et al. Development of resistance to chlorhexidine diacetate in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the effect of a «residual» concentration. Journal of Hospital Infection, 2000, 46:297-303. 277. Larson E et al. An approach for selection of health care personnel handwashing agents. Infection Control, 1986, 7:419-424. 278. Davies J et al. Disinfection of the skin of the abdomen. British Journal of Surgery, 1978, 65:855-858. 279. Larson E et al. Influence of two handwashing frequencies on reduction in colonizing flora with three handwashing products used by health care personnel. American Journal of Infection Control, 1988, 17:83-88. 280. Soulsby ME et al. Brief report: the antiseptic efficacy of chlorxylenol-containing vs. chlorhexidine gluconate-containing surgical scrub preparations. Infection Control, 1986, 7:223-226. 281. Aly R et al. Comparative antibacterial efficacy of a 2-minute surgical scrub with chlorhexidine gluconate, povidone-iodine, and chloroxylenol sponge-brushes. American Journal of Infection Control, 1988, 16:173-177. 282. Archibald LK et al. Serratia marcescens outbreak associated with extrinsic contamination of 1% chlorxylenol soap. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 1997, 18:704-709. 283. Lowbury EJL et al. Disinfection of hands: removal of resident bacteria. BMJ, 1963, 1:1251-1256. 284. Kundsin RB et al. The surgical scrub - practical considerations. Archives of Surgery, 1973, 107:75-77. 285. Lockart J. How toxic is hexachlorophene? Pediatrics, 1972, 50:229-235. 286. Shuman RM et al. Neurotoxicity of hexachlorophene in humans. II. A clinicopathological study of 46 premature infants. Archives of Neurology, 1975, 32:320-325. 287. Dixon RE et al. Staphylococcal disease outbreaks in hospital nurseries in the United States - December 1971 through March 1972. Pediatrics,1973, 51:413-416. 288. Kaslow RA et al. Staphylococcal disease related to hospital nursery bathing practices - a nationwide epidemiologic investigation. Pediatrics, 1973, 51:418-429. 289. American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for perinatal care. 4th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL and Washington, DC, American Academy of Pediatrics, 1997. 290. Kimbrough RD. Review of recent evidence of toxic effects of hexachlorophene. Pediatrics, 1973, 51:391-394. 291. Gottardi W. Iodine and iodine compounds. In: Block SS, ed. Disinfection, sterilization and preservation. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1991:152-166. 292. Anderson RL. Iodophor antiseptics: intrinsic microbial contamination with resistant bacteria. Infection Control Hospital Epidemiology, 1989, 10:443-446. 293. Goldenheim PD. In vitro efficacy of povidone-iodine solution and cream against methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 1993, 69 (Suppl. 3):S62-S65. 294. Traore O et al. An in-vitro evaluation of the activity of povidone-iodine against nosocomial bacterial strains. Journal of Hospital Infection, 1996,34:217-222. 295. McLure AR et al. In-vitro evaluation of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Hospital Infection, 1992, 21:291-299. 296. Davies JG et al. Preliminary study of test methods to assess the virucidal activity of skin disinfectants using poliovirus and bacteriophages. Journal of Hospital Infection, 1993, 25:125-131. 297. Rotter ML. <strong>Hand</strong> washing and hand disinfection. In: Mayhall G, ed. Hospital epidemiology and infection control. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1996:1052-1068. 298. Huang Y et al. Comparative effectiveness of hand-cleansing agents for removing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from experimentally contaminated fingertips. American Journal of Infection Control, 1994, 22:224-227. 299. Wade JJ et al. The evaluation of residual antimicrobial activity on hands and its clinical relevance. Journal of Hospital Infection, 1991, 18:23-28. 300. Aly R et al. Comparative evaluation of chlorhexidine gluconate (hibiclens) and povidoneiodine (E-Z scrub) sponge/brushes for presurgical hand scrubbing. Current Therapeutic Research, 1983, 34:740-745.
301. Herruzo-Cabrera R et al. Usefulness of an alcohol solution of N-duopropenide for the surgical antisepsis of the hands compared with handwashing with iodine-povidone and chlorhexidine: clinical essay. Journal of Surgical Research, 2000, 94:6-12. 302. Hingst V et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection following a reduced application time of 3 instead of 5 min. Journal of Hospital Infection, 1992, 20:79-86. 303. Faoagali J et al. Comparison of the immediate, residual, and cumulative antibacterial effects of Novaderm R, Novascrub R, betadine surgical scrub, Hibiclens, and liquid soap. American Journal of Infection Control, 1995, 23:337-343. 304. Pereira LJ et al. The effect of surgical handwashing routines on the microbial counts of operating room nurses. American Journal of Infection Control, 1990, 18:354-364. 305. Peterson AF et al. Comparative evaluation of surgical scrub preparations. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics, 1978, 146:63-65. 306. Berkelman RL et al. Increased bactericidal activity of dilute preparations of povidone-iodine solutions. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 1982, 15:635-639. 307. Berkelman RL et al. Pseudobacteremia attributed to contamination of povidone-iodine with Pseudomonas cepacia. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1981, 95:32-36. 308. Merianos JJ. Quaternary ammonium antimicrobial compounds. In: Block SS, ed. Disinfection, sterilization, and preservation. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Lea and Febiger, 1991:225-255. 309. Dixon RE et al. Aqueous quaternary ammonium antiseptics and disinfectants. JAMA, 1976, 236:2415-2417. 310. Sautter RL et al. Serratia marcescens meningitis associated with a contaminated benzalkonium chloride solution. Infection Control, 1984, 5:223-225. 311. Oie S et al. Microbial contamination of antiseptics and disinfectants. American Journal of Infection Control, 2000, 24:389-395. 312. Hayes RA et al. Comparison of three hand <strong>hygiene</strong> methods in a surgical intensive care unit . In: American Society for Microbiology, ed. Proceedings of the 41st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, IL, 2001; abstr # K-1337. 313. Dyer DL et al. Testing a new alcohol-free hand sanitizer to combat infection. Association of periOperative Registered Nurses Journal, 1998, 68:239-251. 314. Jones RD et al. Triclosan: a review of effectiveness and safety in health care settings. American Journal of Infection Control, 2000, 28:184-196. 315. Ward WH et al. Kinetic and structural characteristics of the inhibition of enoyl (acyl carrier protein) reductase by triclosan. Biochemistry, 1999, 38:12514-12525. 316. Heath RJ et al. Inhibition of the Staphylococcus aureus NADPH-dependent enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase by triclosan and hexachlorophene. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2000, 275:4654-4659. 317. Faoagali JL et al. Comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of 4% chlorhexidine gluconate and 1% triclosan handwash products in an acute clinical ward. American Journal of Infection Control, 1999, 27:320-326. 318. Barry MA et al. Serratia marcescens contamination of antiseptic soap containing triclosan: implications for nosocomial infection. Infection Control, 1984, 5:427-430. 319. Lowbury EJL et al. Disinfection of hands: removal of transient organisms. BMJ, 1964, 2:230-233. 320. Rotter ML. Semmelweis’ sesquicentennial: a little-noted anniversary of handwashing. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 1998, 11:457-460. 321. Kampf G et al. Dermal tolerance and effect on skin hydration of a new ethanol-based hand gel. Journal of Hospital Infection, 2002, 52:297-301. 322. Manivannan G et al. Immediate, persistent and residual antimicrobial efficiency of surfacine hand sanitizer. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 2000, 21:105. 323. Gershenfeld L. Povidone-iodine as a sporicide. American Journal of Pharmacy, 1962, 134:79-81. 324. Russell AD. Chemical sporicidal and sporostatic agents. In: Block SS, ed. Disinfection, sterilization and preservation, 4th ed. Philadelphia, Lea and Febiger, 1991:365-376. 325. Bettin K et al. Effectiveness of liquid soap vs chlorhexidine gluconate for the removal of Clostridium difficile from bare hands and gloved hands. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 1994, 15:697-702.
Page 2 and 3:
The WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene
Page 5 and 6:
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . ...........
Page 7 and 8:
17. Organizing an education program
Page 11:
INTRODUCTION The WHO Advanced Draft
Page 14 and 15:
Handwashing. Washing hands with pla
Page 16 and 17:
still considered the standard of ca
Page 18 and 19:
treatment selectively removes glyce
Page 20 and 21:
of the organism on their hands. Mak
Page 22 and 23:
6. MODELS OF HAND TRANSMISSION 6.1
Page 24 and 25:
In the 1960s, a prospective, contro
Page 26 and 27:
for its ability to reduce the relea
Page 28 and 29:
8.2 SHORTCOMINGS OF TRADITIONAL TES
Page 30 and 31:
tions of short-chain aliphatic alco
Page 32 and 33:
9.1.3 WATER QUALITY The physical, c
Page 34 and 35:
Case study: experience of Egypt The
Page 36 and 37:
and both reduced viral counts on ha
Page 38 and 39:
activity of chlorhexidine is not se
Page 40 and 41:
protein synthesis and alteration of
Page 42 and 43:
in micelle structures formed by sur
Page 44 and 45:
In all the studies that included pl
Page 46 and 47:
isopropyl alcohol) were applied to
Page 48 and 49:
3) Glycerol is added using a measur
Page 50 and 51:
in 2005 the costs of an alcohol-bas
Page 52 and 53:
infection, risk factors that are la
Page 54 and 55:
11.4.4 SIDE-EFFECTS OF THE SURGICAL
Page 56 and 57:
• Repeat the process on the other
Page 58 and 59:
12.2 ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS RE
Page 60 and 61:
particularly when resources are lim
Page 62 and 63:
Handrubs are available as gels, sol
Page 64 and 65:
14. HAND HYGIENE PRACTICES AMONG HE
Page 66 and 67:
quantified in observational studies
Page 68 and 69:
According to behavioural theories (
Page 70 and 71:
of water with special leaves) outsi
Page 72 and 73:
Furthermore, according to Phra Depv
Page 74 and 75:
16. BEHAVIOURAL CONSIDERATIONS 16.1
Page 76 and 77:
and community factors must be consi
Page 78 and 79:
i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. a) b) Educat
Page 80 and 81:
tion precautions 580 . There are al
Page 82 and 83:
follow the intent 588 . Studies hav
Page 84 and 85:
18. FORMULATING STRATEGIES FOR HAND
Page 86 and 87:
18.2 DEVELOPING A STRATEGY FOR GUID
Page 88 and 89: 1998 (P
Page 90 and 91: HCWs routinely to wear vinyl gloves
Page 92 and 93: quality gloves, reuse, shortage of
Page 94 and 95: • To test for holes, gloves shoul
Page 96 and 97: Figure l.20.2: Blood safety: crucia
Page 98 and 99: Consensus recommendations are that
Page 100 and 101: D. Wash hands with either plain or
Page 102 and 103: 5. SKIN CARE A. B. C. Include infor
Page 107 and 108: PART III. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS 1. M
Page 109 and 110: 2. HAND HYGIENE AS A QUALITY INDICA
Page 111 and 112: can be seen during routine work. Da
Page 113 and 114: Case study: United Kingdom national
Page 115 and 116: PART IV. PROMOTING HAND HYGIENE ON
Page 117 and 118: ated to reinforce its principles (t
Page 119: 6. PRINCIPLES OF COUNTRYWIDE HAND H
Page 122 and 123: As many international and national
Page 124: debate that resulted in increasing
Page 128 and 129: 23. Lee YL et al. Colonization by S
Page 130 and 131: Interscience Conference on Antimicr
Page 132 and 133: 122. Vicca AF. Nursing staff worklo
Page 134 and 135: 171. Kauppinen J et al. Hospital wa
Page 136 and 137: 224. Krilov LR et al. Inactivation
Page 140 and 141: 326. Johnson S et al. Prospective,
Page 142 and 143: 34th Interscience Conference on Ant
Page 144 and 145: 423. Kampf G, et al. Influence of a
Page 146 and 147: 474. West DP et al. Evaluation of a
Page 148 and 149: 524. Muto C et al. Hand hygiene rat
Page 150 and 151: 578. Babcock HM et al. An education
Page 152 and 153: Interscience Conference on Antimicr
Page 154 and 155: 679. Hirschmann H et al. The influe
Page 156: 729. Martin LS, McDougal JS, Loskos
Page 161 and 162: Table I.8.1: Basic experimental des
Page 163 and 164: Table I.9.1: Waterborne pathogens a
Page 165 and 166: Table I.9.3: Virucidal activity of
Page 167 and 168: Table I.9.4: Studies comparing the
Page 169 and 170: Table I.9.6: Studies comparing the
Page 171 and 172: Table I.14.1: Hand hygiene frequenc
Page 173 and 174: Table I.14.2: Hand hygiene adherenc
Page 175 and 176: Table I.15.1: Hand hygiene indicati
Page 177 and 178: Table I.18.1: Strategies for succes
Page 179 and 180: Table l.20.1: Possible problems and
Page 181 and 182: Table I.21.1. Hand hygiene research
Page 183 and 184: Table I.21.1: Hand hygiene research
Page 185 and 186: Table I.21.2: Unsolved issues for r
Page 187 and 188: Table III.2.1: Quality indicators r
Page 189 and 190:
Table V.3.1: Examples of public inf
Page 191 and 192:
Table V.4.1: Examples of national p
Page 193:
Table V.5.1: The public information
Page 197 and 198:
APPENDIX 1. DEFINITIONS OF HEALTH-C
Page 199:
APPENDIX 2. HAND AND SKIN SELF-ASSE
Page 202:
Data in coloured cells can be chang
Page 206:
NHS NICU n-P NPSA NA NS OPD PACU PA
Page 211 and 212:
AUTHORS: John Boyce Saint Raphael H
Page 213 and 214:
Garance Upham People’s Health Mov
show all

Hand hygiene.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?