Guide on Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples

More documents

Recommendations

Info

work in Copenhagen in 2009.” 6•25%-40%In COP14 in Poznan, Poland, indigenous-percentage below 1990 peoples expressed outrage when the “Unitedlevels that the AWG-KP States, Canada, Australia and New Zealandrecommended that Annex opposed the inclusion of recognition of1 countries should cut the rights of indigenous peoples and localtheir GHG emission for communities in a decision on REDD draftedthe period beyond 2012. by government delegates at the UN ClimateConference.” 7 In the Draft Conclusions onAgenda Item 5: Reducing emissions from deforestation in developingcountries: approaches to stimulate action (FCCC/SBSTA/2008/L.23),references to rights of indigenous peoples and the UNDRIP wereremoved. “Furthermore, these same states used the phrase ‘indigenouspeople’ instead of ‘indigenous peoples’ with an ‘s’ which is theinternationally accepted language.” 8• In the Climate Change Talks in Bonn (AWG-KP7 and AWG-LCA5, 29 March- 8 April, 2009), Tuvalu suggested references to the UNDRIP and to free,prior and informed consent tothe AWG-LCA Contact Groupon Mitigation. A total of 18 to20 interventions from friendlygovernments on REDD - ledby Norway and Bolivia - madereferences to indigenouspeoples. The Chairs of theAWG-LCA and AWG-KP weremandated to come out with anegotiating text in time for theClimate Change Talks in June2009.• A Chairman’s RevisedNegotiating Text (FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/INF.1, 22 June2009) was presented by theAWG-LCA Chair, Michael ZammitCutajar (Malta), at AWG-LCA6in June 2009. This 199-pagedocument, which was presentedas a compilation of thesubmissions from Parties, wascriticized by many developingcountries because they claimthat their submissions were notAWG-LCA RevisedNegotiating Textwith Attributions,Intersessional informalconsultationsParagraphs 106 to 128 of the Annex toFCCC/AWGLCA/2009/INF.1Informal subgroup on para 1(b) (iii)13 August 2009, 1545h109. [[There should be full andeffective engagement of] (Australia)[Indigenous peoples and] localcommunities [[should] [shall] beinvolved] [must not be only likeassistants to the implementation, butmust begin with (Paraguay) ] [in designplans and actions] (Paraguay) [design,development and] (Bolivia, Cuba, ElSalvador, Paraguay and Venezuela)implementation of [REDD-plus](Australia) actions [in their land](Colombia, Peru) and their rights(Continued next page)122 <strong>Guide</strong> on Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples
eflected. They also complainedabout the lack of attribution onwhich Party said what. This alsomade it difficult for indigenouspeoples to know which countrysubmitted the language whichmentioned indigenous peoples.Due to the insistence of G77and China, the Secretariat putthe attributions on the text(INF.1) and put this on theUNFCCC website for people torefer to (see box on paragraph109 on p. 122).• This text contains severalreferences to indigenouspeoples and the UNDRIP. Allof these are in brackets whichmeans that these are not yetagreed upon.[should be] (Australia) respected,[including the right of full prior andinformed consent,] (Bolivia, Cuba, ElSalvador, Paraguay and Venezuela)[including prior and informedconsent,] (Colombia) [consistent withthe provisions established under therespective national legislation [or],[and][in its absence,] [in accordancewith the United Nations Declarationon the Rights of Indigenous Peoples][consistent with relevant internationalinstruments, obligations and nationallegislation] (Australia). [The CBDand its Expanded Work Programme onBiodiversity in forest should be observedto avoid inconsistencies at level ofnational implementation.] (Paraguay)References to indigenous peoples andthe UNDRIP in the Chairman’s RevisedNegotiating Text (FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/INF.1Section II: Enhanced action on adaptation and its means of implementation.(involvement of indigenous peoples and local communities in the implementation ofadaptation actions, adaptation actions should be consistent with principles containedin the UNDRIP, etc.);Section III: Enhanced action on mitigation (sub-section c). Policy approaches andpositive incentives on issues relating to reducing emissions from deforestation andforest degradation in developing countries; the role of conservation, sustainablemanagement of forests and enhancement of carbon stocks in developing countries.This subsection on REDD is from page 110 -129 and contains the most referencesto indigenous peoples’ rights; UNDRIP; free, prior and informed consent; andtraditional knowledge. Paragraph 109 is one example which contains all these.Section IV. Enhanced action on financing, technology and capacity building:Subsection B: Enhanced action on development and transfer of technology. Analternative chapeau to Paragraph 180 mentions that participation of stakeholders,including indigenous peoples... should be ensured at all levels of decision-making ontechnology cooperation and sharing.PART VIII: The Current State of Climate Change Negotiations 123
Page 4:
Guide on Climate C
Page 9:
• Our ancestors and we, the prese
Page 13 and 14:
effect. As humans emit more carbon
Page 15:
affected by industrial and other em
Page 18 and 19:
What is Joint Implementation (JI)?J
Page 20:
Endnotes:1 Greenhouse gases which a
Page 26 and 27:
y forced use of heavily contaminate
Page 28:
• Incessant rains in high altitud
Page 32 and 33:
vulnerable to environmental degrada
Page 34 and 35:
• The IPCC Fourth Assessment Repo
Page 36 and 37:
BuildingsIndustryAgricultureForestr
Page 38 and 39:
• For indigenous peoples: indigen
Page 40 and 41:
Box 2Mt. Elgon National Park in Uga
Page 42 and 43:
harvested, these shouldbe transport
Page 44 and 45:
Box 4Western Arnhem Fire Management
Page 46 and 47:
of climate change. Thus, there isa
Page 48 and 49:
• Focus - Urgent and immediate ne
Page 50 and 51:
activities according to the obligat
Page 52 and 53:
• Some supplement their subsisten
Page 54 and 55:
Aside from the cases presented abov
Page 56 and 57:
ExchangeResourcemanagement• Using
Page 58 and 59:
Part VREDD/REDD+and Indigenous Peop
Page 60 and 61:
Figure 2. Annual Global Emissions f
Page 62 and 63:
sequestration, ensure soilfertility
Page 64 and 65:
4What are the mitigation optionsund
Page 66 and 67:
governance of forests (e.g., Tropic
Page 68 and 69:
UNPFII 7th Session Recommendations
Page 70 and 71:
ecommendation on the needto respect
Page 72 and 73:
Mechanisms and Trust Funds of the F
Page 74 and 75:
R-PP - ReadinessPreparation Proposa
Page 76 and 77:
UNPFII 7th Session Report recommend
Page 78 and 79:
conservation and sustainableuse of
Page 80 and 81:
peoples, local communities and wome
Page 82 and 83: Aims of UN-REDDTo assist developing
Page 84 and 85: Key document underpinningUN-REDD Pr
Page 86 and 87: continue their unsustainable and hi
Page 88 and 89: 10On the other hand, what are theop
Page 90 and 91: strengthen the implementation of UN
Page 92 and 93: 11What is an example of an indigeno
Page 94 and 95: Photo credit: AMAN.Regulation on Re
Page 96 and 97: Photo credit: AMAN.including indige
Page 98 and 99: • Conclusion: This case study sho
Page 100 and 101: • This workshop, held in March200
Page 102 and 103: What are the key issues beingnegoti
Page 104 and 105: “leakage,” difficulty in accura
Page 106 and 107: • Proxy means that simplified but
Page 108 and 109: 18 This is a document entitled “C
Page 110 and 111: 2Why is Biodiversityimportant?The v
Page 112 and 113: the territories in which indigenous
Page 114 and 115: integrated with other strategies su
Page 116 and 117: 10Why should traditional knowledgeo
Page 118 and 119: Endnotes:1 Secretariat of the Conve
Page 120 and 121: Some of the impacts are as follows:
Page 122 and 123: increase 6 and limit their chances
Page 124 and 125: 4How are mitigating measures on cli
Page 126 and 127: Uganda were also transformed intosu
Page 128 and 129: 1What is the Bali Roadmap 1 and the
Page 130 and 131: 3What were the key developments in
Page 134 and 135: • At SBSTA30 held in the 2nd Bonn
Page 136 and 137: “Post-Kyoto” or “Copenhagen P
Page 138 and 139: Role of the USin mitigationand trea
Page 140 and 141: Finance andtechnology(overall)- Con
Page 142 and 143: TechnologyDefinition oftechnologytr
Page 144 and 145: Legal form ofoutcome andtracks- Mos
Page 146 and 147: Trade andClimate- Stronglyagainstun
Page 148 and 149: 6Why are these negotiations relevan
Page 150 and 151: Part IXWays Forward: The UNDeclarat
Page 152 and 153: esource rights, as well asits use a
Page 154 and 155: Participation and Inclusion: Every
Page 156 and 157: 4. Enhance and deepen our understan
Page 158 and 159: funds like the BioCarbon Fund shoul
Page 160 and 161: AnnexesANNEX AUNITED NATIONS FRAMEW
Page 162 and 163: economically in their own right and
Page 164 and 165: consideration.3. The Parties should
Page 166 and 167: objective. These Parties may implem
Page 168 and 169: (g) Countries with areas with fragi
Page 170 and 171: (e) Assess, on the basis of all inf
Page 172 and 173: (b) Prepare scientific assessments
Page 174 and 175: eferred to in subparagraph (a) imme
Page 176 and 177: 8. The provisions of this Article s
Page 178 and 179: Article 20SIGNATUREThis Convention
Page 180 and 181: Article 26AUTHENTIC TEXTSThe origin
Page 182 and 183:
New ZealandNorwayPortugalSpainSwede
Page 184 and 185:
(c)country Parties, while ensuring
Page 186 and 187:
2. Decides that the process shall b
Page 188 and 189:
ANNEX CThe Anchorage Declaration24
Page 190 and 191:
climate change.5. All initiatives u
Page 192 and 193:
ANNEX DGlobal Consultation on REDD
Page 194 and 195:
REDD Funds24. Tie funding to compli
Page 196 and 197:
2. September 15: Facilitator circul
Page 198 and 199:
Some references on Climate Changean
Page 200 and 201:
Manaus declaration / Declaración d
Page 202 and 203:
Websites:Australia’s Internationa
Page 204 and 205:
IN20- Nitrous OxideILOIPACCIPCCIPRI
Page 206:
196 Guide on Clima
show all

Guide on Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?