With-Love-to-Muhammad

82 With Love to Muhammad sa the Khātam-un-Nabiyyīnconnotation of Khātam-un-Nabiyyīn, but the descent ofJesus as from heaven would certainly change it. 73Based on personal communication with Farhan Khan, we knowthat he has read the book quoted above several times. Althoughimpossible, it would have been more appropriate for him to atleast try to refute the argument and logic given in the abovequotation instead of picking arguments derived from the insightof individual Ahmadīs and refuting those. His example is like apigeon who closes his eyes in hopes that the cat disappears,when in reality the cat is right in front of him and is about tomake a meal out of him! Closing his eyes to the flawless logic ofthe Ahmadiyya Muslim beliefs does not mean that it will goaway!!Distinction between Law-Bearing and Non-Law-BearingProphetsUnder the section entitled No Firm Basis for the DistinctionBetween Law-Bearing vs. Non-Law-Bearing Prophet, Farhan Khantries to refute the Ahmadiyya Muslim belief in a distinctionbetween law-bearing and non-law-bearing prophets bypresenting the following argument:The crux of the refutation of this argument lays in animportant distinction between the methods Allāhemploys to communicate with his prophets. What isknown from the Qur’ān is that Allāh sent inspiration(wahi) to all of the Prophets, but did not necessarilyspeak (kalama) to them all.73A Misconception Removed, Hazrat Mirzā Ghulām Ahmad as , (Islāmabad,Islām International Publications Ltd., 2007), Pages 3-5