With-Love-to-Muhammad

Last Law-bearing Prophet sa 65accusations of Farhan Khan fall on the saints of the Muslimummah, not the Ahmadī Muslims. This also exposes hisdishonesty and his shallow attempt to lead people astray withhis false accusations against Ahmadiyya, the True Islām.To prove this beyond a shadow of doubt, a few examplesfrom the writings of great saints of the Muslim ummah are beingpresented here. Hazrat Muhy-ud-Dīn Ibn ‘Arabī rh , a great saint,expresses his belief in the following quotation:The prophethood which came to an end with theadvent of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings ofAllāh be on him) was Tashrī’ī Nubuwwat [i.e., aprophet with a new book and new law]. There is noroom for such prophethood after the Holy Qur’ān.This is the correct meaning of the hadith, whichcontains the Holy Prophet’s saying that there is to beno prophet after him. The hadith only conveys thatafter the Holy Prophet, there can be no prophet whowill replace his sharī‘ah with another one. Henceforth,whenever any prophet comes, he will be subordinateto him and his sharī‘ah. 47Similarly, Sheikh Balī Āfandī wrote in Fusūs-ul-Hakam, “Khātamur-Rusulis one after whom no law-bearing prophet can come”. 48The famous saint, Hazrat Syed ‘Abd-ul-Karīm Gilānī wrote:With the advent of the Holy Prophet (peace andblessings of Allāh be on him), prophethood bearing anew law came to an end. The Holy Prophet (peaceand blessings of Allāh be on him) was called Khātam-47Futūhāt Makkiyyah, Volume 2, Chapter 73, Page 348Fusūs Al-Hakam,Page 56