- Page 1 and 2: eSafety CompendiumMay 2006
- Page 4: Table of ContentsINTRODUCTION .....
- Page 7 and 8: Page 5 of 490
- Page 9 and 10: Modern society depends heavily on m
- Page 11 and 12: This eSafety Compendium aims to sum
- Page 13 and 14: The Forum Plenary Sessions discuss
- Page 15 and 16: IntroductionThe eSafety High-Level
- Page 17 and 18: · NL - Ministry of Transport, Publ
- Page 19 and 20: Further improvements in safety by t
- Page 21 and 22: The driver is also aware that his c
- Page 23 and 24: For both cars and commercial vehicl
- Page 25: It can be expected that in the near
- Page 29 and 30: Lane supportLane keeping, lane depa
- Page 31 and 32: Safe speed and speed warningThese s
- Page 33 and 34: Active pedestrian protection system
- Page 35 and 36: Need for further RTD in technologie
- Page 37 and 38: 3.8. Emergency Calls (e-Calls) and
- Page 39 and 40: Recommendations:(12) After consulta
- Page 41 and 42: There is also the forum of the Unit
- Page 43 and 44: Vehicle-to-infrastructure communica
- Page 45 and 46: Overridable intervention systemsThe
- Page 47 and 48: The Short Range Automotive Radar Fr
- Page 49 and 50: Towards a positive business caseThe
- Page 51 and 52: User Perception of Costs and Benefi
- Page 53 and 54: GSM Global System for Mobile Commun
- Page 55 and 56: Human-Machine Interaction5 Assess t
- Page 57 and 58: 13 Establish a European Emergency C
- Page 59 and 60: 22 Undertake the standardisation in
- Page 61 and 62: 1.2 Progress of the 28recommendatio
- Page 63 and 64: Progress of the 28 RecommendationsL
- Page 65 and 66: European R&D:APROSYS (www.aprosys.c
- Page 67 and 68: Impact assessment of safety systems
- Page 69 and 70: Recommendation number and title:4)
- Page 71 and 72: 5. Nomadic devices6. Criteria and V
- Page 73 and 74: Road Map for Intelligent Integrated
- Page 75 and 76: The priority infrastructure-related
- Page 77 and 78:
o. Concerning dynamic traffic manag
- Page 79 and 80:
The group presented its final resul
- Page 81 and 82:
European R&D:- ADASE II (http://www
- Page 83 and 84:
eSafety Working Groups:The Internat
- Page 85 and 86:
European R&D:ActMAP (www.ertico.com
- Page 87 and 88:
Emergency Calls (e-Calls) and E-112
- Page 89 and 90:
The Commission also supports the wo
- Page 91 and 92:
RDS-TMC receiver deployment is grad
- Page 93 and 94:
Motor vehicle type-approval legisla
- Page 95 and 96:
Legal issues of market introduction
- Page 97 and 98:
Ultra wide-band 24 GHz short range
- Page 99 and 100:
Societal aspectsRecommendation numb
- Page 101 and 102:
eSafety Working Groups:The Working
- Page 103 and 104:
The different business casesRecomme
- Page 105 and 106:
Future actions:To support the busin
- Page 107 and 108:
The group has analysed some consume
- Page 109 and 110:
National activities:(not available)
- Page 112:
CHAPTER II -EUROPEAN COMMISSIONESAF
- Page 115 and 116:
CHAPTER III -ESAFETY FORUM HIGHLEVE
- Page 117 and 118:
3.1 First eSafety High Level Meetin
- Page 119 and 120:
6. Collaboration on issues relating
- Page 121 and 122:
eCalleCall is a major priority for
- Page 123 and 124:
3.3 First eSafety Forum PlenaryMeet
- Page 125 and 126:
The next steps identified for the m
- Page 127 and 128:
3.4 Second eSafety Forum PlenaryMee
- Page 129 and 130:
3.5 eSafety Forum Summary Report200
- Page 131 and 132:
1.3.1 The Working GroupsThe Working
- Page 133 and 134:
Road MapsThe market introduction of
- Page 135 and 136:
a) Existing Data SourcesThe working
- Page 137 and 138:
Workplan and Longer term initiative
- Page 139 and 140:
• Having recognised the absolute
- Page 141 and 142:
The approach taken by the WG-HMI ca
- Page 143 and 144:
2.) There is a firm basis for Inter
- Page 145 and 146:
4. The International Working Group
- Page 147 and 148:
Broadcast frequencies and capacity:
- Page 149 and 150:
RecommendationsThe analysis of arou
- Page 151 and 152:
2.7 Road Maps WGCo-chairsRisto Kulm
- Page 153 and 154:
ImpactBased on results of Road Maps
- Page 155 and 156:
Josef HeimannJuhani JaaskelainenJü
- Page 157 and 158:
Research and Technology Development
- Page 159 and 160:
2.5 The following Working Groups wi
- Page 161 and 162:
ANNEX III: Conclusions of the 2nd e
- Page 163 and 164:
ERTICO invited its Public Authoriti
- Page 165 and 166:
The automotive industry is to co-op
- Page 167 and 168:
The In-Vehicle Emergency Call (eCal
- Page 169 and 170:
Real-Time Traffic And Travel Inform
- Page 171 and 172:
4. Take measures (for example legis
- Page 173 and 174:
Progress in eSafetyAs many eSafety
- Page 175 and 176:
It was also suggested that the Comm
- Page 177 and 178:
3.9 Fourth eSafety Forum PlenaryMee
- Page 179 and 180:
3.10 The Second eSafety High LevelM
- Page 182 and 183:
CHAPTER IV -ESAFETY WORKINGGROUPS H
- Page 184 and 185:
4.1 Accident Causation AnalysisWork
- Page 186 and 187:
2. Links with other connected initi
- Page 188 and 189:
Annex 1 - ANALYSIS OF EXISTING DATA
- Page 190 and 191:
2. Statistical overview of descript
- Page 192 and 193:
Annex 2: Questions to be Answered D
- Page 194 and 195:
Parameter Generic Question Detailed
- Page 196 and 197:
2.2 EvaluationEvaluation in this co
- Page 198 and 199:
Annex 3: Accident Causation Analysi
- Page 200 and 201:
Annex 4: Accident Causation Analysi
- Page 202 and 203:
The Communications Working Group is
- Page 204 and 205:
The eSafety partners have also agre
- Page 206 and 207:
In addition, the Final Report of th
- Page 208 and 209:
Advice applications do not change t
- Page 210 and 211:
From the discussions held within MA
- Page 212 and 213:
The expected fatality reduction is
- Page 214 and 215:
4.1 EuroRoadS4.1.1 DescriptionEuroR
- Page 216 and 217:
esults of this survey have to be ma
- Page 218 and 219:
4.6 SafeMAP4.6.1 DescriptionThe Saf
- Page 220 and 221:
9. When public authorities introduc
- Page 222 and 223:
Time planning, meetings and activit
- Page 224 and 225:
NameJuhani JaaskelainenElina Holmbe
- Page 226 and 227:
The eSafety partners have also agre
- Page 228 and 229:
2. Involved PartiesMoving forward w
- Page 230 and 231:
To achieve the objectives each part
- Page 232 and 233:
Annex A - Relevant European Resolut
- Page 234 and 235:
4.5 Heavy Duty Vehicles Working Gro
- Page 236 and 237:
4.5.1 Final Report of Heavy Duty Ve
- Page 238 and 239:
It was not the role of the Working
- Page 240 and 241:
Not all participants were able to a
- Page 242 and 243:
The measures were evaluated in qual
- Page 244 and 245:
4. Results of the “Accident Resea
- Page 246 and 247:
Fatalities1,400Absolute frequency1,
- Page 248 and 249:
Fig. 4: “Other party involved”
- Page 250 and 251:
4.2.2 Truck accidents with killed o
- Page 252 and 253:
Most truck/pedestrian accidents occ
- Page 254 and 255:
4.2.5 Basic concept of an EU-wide c
- Page 256 and 257:
5.1.4 Seat-belt warningIn spite of
- Page 258 and 259:
5.2 Evaluation of the available sys
- Page 260 and 261:
5.3.3 Pedestrian protection systemI
- Page 262 and 263:
5.4.1 AvailabilityGiven the product
- Page 264 and 265:
Fig. 7: System costs of effective a
- Page 266 and 267:
5.4.4 AcceptanceAnother important c
- Page 268 and 269:
6.1.2 Action prioritiesGiven that t
- Page 270 and 271:
6.2.3 Action prioritiesFor all OEMs
- Page 272 and 273:
We are grateful for the constant su
- Page 274 and 275:
Action Items for the ECCommission A
- Page 276 and 277:
Safety Measures Working List - eSaf
- Page 278 and 279:
The Working Group took a balanced r
- Page 280 and 281:
The importance of a safe human mach
- Page 282 and 283:
Finally the Working Group identifie
- Page 284 and 285:
1. BackgroundThe importance of a sa
- Page 286 and 287:
The attitude of those member states
- Page 288 and 289:
The U.S. National Highway Traffic S
- Page 290 and 291:
2.3.1 After-Market SystemsDefinitio
- Page 292 and 293:
2.4 Multiple Actors - a shared resp
- Page 294 and 295:
As already mentioned, specific issu
- Page 296 and 297:
The product-responsible organisatio
- Page 298 and 299:
Regarding after-market systems and
- Page 300 and 301:
R-ESoP-5 Add specific criterion to
- Page 302 and 303:
As shown in Annex E some principles
- Page 304 and 305:
A certain level of driver workload
- Page 306 and 307:
Apart from the nomadic device manuf
- Page 308 and 309:
6.4 Authorities6.4.1 Situation Anal
- Page 310 and 311:
R-ESoP-7R-ESoP-8R-ESoP-9criteria wo
- Page 312 and 313:
R-MS-6R-MS-7R-MS-8R-MS-9R-MS-10R-MS
- Page 314 and 315:
ANNEX BESoP - VerificationEU Statem
- Page 316 and 317:
3. Information Presentation Princip
- Page 318 and 319:
5.1 Visual information not related
- Page 320 and 321:
ANNEX CSummary of Member State Resp
- Page 322 and 323:
ANNEX DEmployers Responsibilities a
- Page 324 and 325:
ANNEX EESoP - AAM-Guideline Compari
- Page 326 and 327:
4. Principles on Interaction with D
- Page 328 and 329:
EU Statement of Principles AAM-guid
- Page 330 and 331:
EU Statement of Principles NPSC Not
- Page 332 and 333:
5. System Behaviour PrinciplesEU St
- Page 334 and 335:
ANNEX G Installation Recommendation
- Page 336 and 337:
Test procedureThe vehicle must be a
- Page 338 and 339:
ANNEX HDefinitionsafter-market syst
- Page 340 and 341:
C. Evaluation of findings and best/
- Page 342 and 343:
• cost for information infrastruc
- Page 344 and 345:
j. The industry, European Commissio
- Page 346 and 347:
B Qualified ranking for identificat
- Page 348 and 349:
Table 2. Description of infrastruct
- Page 350 and 351:
5. Assessment of safety impactsIndi
- Page 352 and 353:
Table 5. Estimates of new car marke
- Page 354 and 355:
7. Implementation issuesThe impleme
- Page 356 and 357:
As with all of the driver assistanc
- Page 358 and 359:
7.7 eCallOne of the most complex sy
- Page 360 and 361:
- take steps to ensure roaming and
- Page 362 and 363:
The demand for speed alert is expec
- Page 364 and 365:
9. Conclusions and recommendationsT
- Page 366 and 367:
The following recommendations were
- Page 368 and 369:
Annex 1: Safety effect overviewsPri
- Page 370 and 371:
Collision warnings systems are curr
- Page 372 and 373:
Dynamic traffic management and loca
- Page 374 and 375:
Speed alert systems signalling with
- Page 376 and 377:
Nishimura, Y. AND Nagaya, R. (1997)
- Page 378 and 379:
Attempt to assess the impact of Tel
- Page 380 and 381:
Lane KeepingAssistant andLaneDepart
- Page 382 and 383:
Comparing the different values for
- Page 384 and 385:
The table below shows the full safe
- Page 386 and 387:
% TERN/motorway length covered with
- Page 388 and 389:
FBusiness Case / Customer Awareness
- Page 390 and 391:
Implementation Issues for Blind Spo
- Page 392 and 393:
Blind Spot MonitoringVery highHighM
- Page 394 and 395:
technical availability: givenorgani
- Page 396 and 397:
Implementation Issues for Obstacle
- Page 398 and 399:
Obstacle and collision warningVery
- Page 400 and 401:
According to the V analysis of the
- Page 402 and 403:
Implementation Issues for eCallASys
- Page 404 and 405:
GHKey Success FactorsThe commitment
- Page 406 and 407:
Implementation Issues for Extended
- Page 408 and 409:
HFeasible Deployment Strategiestech
- Page 410 and 411:
Implementation Issues for RTTIASyst
- Page 412 and 413:
FBusiness Case / Customer Awareness
- Page 414 and 415:
Real-Time Traffic InformationVery h
- Page 416 and 417:
- Speed management /speed harmonisa
- Page 418 and 419:
can be estimated to be in the range
- Page 420 and 421:
A crude estimate of the benefits of
- Page 422 and 423:
delivery of safety quality-assured
- Page 424 and 425:
A crude estimate of the benefits of
- Page 426 and 427:
4. ReportingThe Road Map group repo
- Page 428 and 429:
4.8 International Cooperation Worki
- Page 430 and 431:
4.9.1 Final Report and Recommendati
- Page 432 and 433:
12. The Council of the Transport Mi
- Page 434 and 435:
Broadcasted traffic Information to
- Page 436 and 437:
This work is still under way. There
- Page 438 and 439:
5. Results and Recommendations1. Th
- Page 440 and 441:
Annex 1European RDS/TMC-Services in
- Page 442 and 443:
4.10.1 Progress Report of the eSafe
- Page 444 and 445:
Figure 1: A summary of theEU R&D pr
- Page 446 and 447:
• A European/Global market for sa
- Page 448 and 449:
Concluding remarksTo reach the ambi
- Page 451 and 452:
CHAPTER V -OTHER ESAFETY RELATEDTOP
- Page 453 and 454:
5.2 Intelligent Cooperative Systems
- Page 455 and 456:
5.2.1 Working Paper on Intelligent
- Page 457 and 458:
The Intelligent Transport Standards
- Page 459 and 460:
If frequencies in the 5.9 GHz band
- Page 461 and 462:
5. Intelligent Cooperative Systems
- Page 463 and 464:
CVIS is a 48-month Integrated Proje
- Page 465 and 466:
The goal of VII is to evaluate the
- Page 467 and 468:
Deployment strategiesFrom the above
- Page 470 and 471:
CHAPTER VI -APPENDIXESPage 463 of 4
- Page 472 and 473:
ANB: Automatic emergency brake assi
- Page 474 and 475:
ECDIS: Electronic Chart Display and
- Page 476 and 477:
IETF: Internet Engineering Task For
- Page 478 and 479:
RDWS: Road Departure Warning System
- Page 480 and 481:
VII: Vehicle-Infrastructure Integra
- Page 482 and 483:
ADC (Automatic Distance Control):Th
- Page 484 and 485:
BSM (Blind Spot Monitor):Vehicle-ba
- Page 486 and 487:
Dynamic control systemsActive Front
- Page 488 and 489:
FCW (Front-end Collision Warning):A
- Page 490 and 491:
Integral handling control:The syste
- Page 492 and 493:
On-Board Safety Monitoring:Manageme
- Page 494 and 495:
Traffic information:The provision o
- Page 497:
CHAPTER VII -ANNEXESPage 489 of 490
- Page 500 and 501:
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNIT
- Page 502 and 503:
and actuators, more and more of the
- Page 504 and 505:
1. INTRODUCTION1.1. The transport s
- Page 506 and 507:
During the last decade, we have mad
- Page 508 and 509:
2. REAPING THE BENEFITS OF INFORMAT
- Page 510 and 511:
knowledge required to address major
- Page 512 and 513:
maintenance typically accounts for
- Page 514 and 515:
These systems, when deployed in suf
- Page 516 and 517:
Systems 21 , which has been largely
- Page 518 and 519:
Commission actions:• To facilitat
- Page 520 and 521:
Systems for accelerated standardisa
- Page 522 and 523:
oth system design specifications an
- Page 524 and 525:
ANNEX 1: GLOSSARY OF TERMSABSACEAAD
- Page 526 and 527:
ANNEX 2: SUMMARY OF CONSULTATIONSAl
- Page 529 and 530:
ANNEX II - 2ND ESAFETYCOMMUNICATION
- Page 531 and 532:
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION T
- Page 533 and 534:
2.2 Why do we need eCall ?According
- Page 535 and 536:
The Directive on Privacy and Electr
- Page 537 and 538:
3. The Member States should upgrade
- Page 539:
The eSafety Forum User Outreach Wor
- Page 542 and 543:
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNIT
- Page 544 and 545:
Concerning energy efficiency and em
- Page 546 and 547:
A survey done by EUROTEST 11 on a r
- Page 548 and 549:
(2) Produce Commission Recommendati
- Page 550 and 551:
will investigate the most appropria
- Page 553 and 554:
ANNEX IV - RADIOSPECTRUM POLICY FAC
- Page 555:
equipment, typically operated witho
- Page 558 and 559:
24.4.2002 L 108/1Official Journal o
- Page 560 and 561:
24.4.2002 L 108/3Official Journal o
- Page 562 and 563:
24.4.2002 L 108/5Official Journal o
- Page 565 and 566:
ANNEX VI - COMMISSIONDECISION ON TH
- Page 567 and 568:
ENL 21/16 Official Journal of the E
- Page 569 and 570:
ENL 21/18 Official Journal of the E
- Page 571:
ENL 21/20 Official Journal of the E
- Page 574 and 575:
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONDirectorate-Gene
- Page 576 and 577:
frequency range would not be feasib
- Page 578 and 579:
d) A review mechanism. The RSC to u
- Page 581 and 582:
ANNEX VIII - CEPTREPORT TO THE ECUN
- Page 583 and 584:
CEPT1.1.1.1.ECCElectronic Communica
- Page 585 and 586:
6 AFTERMARKET FITMENT .............
- Page 587 and 588:
− A review process would allow al
- Page 589 and 590:
whether the area of such country is
- Page 591 and 592:
4. 0 INTRODUCTIONThis draft report
- Page 593 and 594:
The FCC Regulation was a controvers
- Page 595 and 596:
of the ECC Decision in order to ens
- Page 597 and 598:
mandatory after a transitional peri
- Page 599 and 600:
In addition, the so-called “2 pha
- Page 601 and 602:
Darnhall 53°09'22" N 02°32'03" WJ
- Page 603 and 604:
3.3.1 Radio Astronomy ServiceThe sh
- Page 605 and 606:
this basis, it is understood that t
- Page 607 and 608:
• It is not possible to record in
- Page 609 and 610:
Another difficulty is that no gener
- Page 611 and 612:
As SRR will operate on non-interfer
- Page 613 and 614:
The ECC Decision at 24 GHz is adopt
- Page 615:
Committee should establish the nece
- Page 618 and 619:
For this to happen, radio spectrum
- Page 620 and 621:
) Harmonised standards. A new harmo
- Page 622 and 623:
March/July 2004 ECC Decisions Adopt
- Page 625 and 626:
ECC/DEC/(04)03EXPLANATORY MEMORANDU
- Page 627 and 628:
ECC Decisionof 19 March 2004on the
- Page 629 and 630:
ECC/DEC/(04)03DECIDES1. that for th
- Page 631 and 632:
ECC/DEC/(0a)xxEUROPEAN CONFERENCE O
- Page 633 and 634:
With regard to Fixed Service, altho
- Page 635 and 636:
ECC Decisionof DD/MM/YYon the frequ
- Page 637 and 638:
percentage of vehicles equipped wit
- Page 639 and 640:
DECIDES1. that for the purpose of t
- Page 643 and 644:
ANNEX IX -EXPLANATORYMEMORANDUM TO
- Page 645 and 646:
10 March 2005Explanatory Memorandum
- Page 647 and 648:
The 24 GHz range radio spectrum ban
- Page 649 and 650:
CEPT has concluded that protection
- Page 651 and 652:
(see below) for the vehicle’s Cer
- Page 654 and 655:
ANNEX X - COMMISSIONRECOMMENDATION
- Page 656 and 657:
L 189/50ENOfficial Journal of the E
- Page 658:
The eSafety InitiativeeSafety websi