eSafety Compendium

R-ESoP-7R-ESoP-8R-ESoP-9criteria would only be valid under defined and repeatable conditions, itappears to be reasonable to define a minimum number of interactions inorder to call it “long”. The ESoP expansions published in 2001 containsome proposals about how this issue could be resolved.Revise principles on information about the system including instructionson system use, since the driver is ultimately responsible for system usewhile driving (Vienna Convention).Reword ESoP carefully for clarity but with no fundamental change to thestructure and to the existing principlesEnhance applicability of the ESoP by explicitly naming what needs to bedone to apply a principle. Precisely link standards, rules and directives tothe specific principle. In general, exercise caution over additional, notsufficiently validated, verification procedures – Annex BR-ESoP-10 Continue to monitor standardization activities, EC-funded projects, AAMdevelopments, Japanese activities etc. and evaluate opportunities forcollaboration – see Annex E, FR-ESoP-11 In order to ensure an efficient process of revising the ESoP it isrecommended that this work should be carried out by a small group ofwell-informed and well-motivated persons covering vehiclemanufacturers, suppliers and research institutions/Governmentrepresentatives.7.2 Concerning Additional ActionsManufacturers of Nomadic Devices and After-market Systems (SyM)R-SyM-1 If a nomadic device or a specific function is meant to be used by thedriver while driving, system manufacturers (SyM) and system providers 80should be responsible for applying the ESoP for nomadic devices and forproviding clear instructions of use to the driver.R-SyM-2R-SyM-3R-SyM-4.If a nomadic device or a specific function is meant to be used while thevehicle is in motion the system manufacturers (SyM) should beresponsible for supplying fitting kit according to ESoP for installation(comply with intent of ECE21) and to ensure consumer information.For functions not intended to be accessible to the driver while the vehicleis in motion, the system manufacturer should ensure that these functionsare disabled when the vehicle is moving 81Nomadic device manufacturers should cooperate with the automotiveindustry aiming at accessing the integrated HMI of the vehicle, e.g. byproviding smart, standardized interfaces between NDs and the vehicle.Page 305 of 490