eSafety Compendium

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table of ContentsINTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 6CHAPTER I - THE 28 ESAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS ........................... 121.1 Final Report of the eSafety Working Group on Road Safety, Annex 1: 28Recommendations, November 2002 .........................................................................141.2 Progress of the 28 recommendations..................................................................59CHAPTER II - EUROPEAN COMMISSION ESAFETY COMMUNICATIONS...................................................................................................................... 109CHAPTER III - ESAFETY FORUM HIGH LEVEL AND PLENARYMEETINGS CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................... 1113.1 First eSafety High Level Meeting, Brussels, 25 April 2002............................1133.2 Second eSafety High Level Meeting, Brussels, 14 November 2002 ...............1163.3 First eSafety Forum Plenary Meeting, Brussels, 22 April 2003 ....................1193.4 Second eSafety Forum Plenary Meeting, Madrid, 17 November 2003.........1233.5 eSafety Forum Summary Report 2003, Madrid, 17 November 2003............1253.6 Third eSafety Forum Plenary Meeting, Brussels, 25 March 2004 ................1583.7 eSafety High-Level Meeting with Public Authorities, Brussels, 27 September2004............................................................................................................................1623.8 eSafety High Level Meeting with Industry, Brussels, 3 February 2005 .......1683.9 Fourth eSafety Forum Plenary Meeting, Hanover, 2 June 2005...................1733.10 The Second eSafety High Level Meeting with Member States, Brussels, 18October 2005.............................................................................................................175CHAPTER IV - ESAFETY WORKING GROUPS HISTORY AND FINALRECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................ 1774.1 Accident Causation Analysis Working Group................................................179Page 2 of 490
Page 1 and 2: eSafety CompendiumMay 2006
Page 6 and 7: 6.1 Acronym list ..................
Page 8 and 9: INTRODUCTIONPage 6 of 490
Page 10 and 11: The eSafety Forum created several W
Page 12 and 13: The Forum now has more than 150 act
Page 14 and 15: CHAPTER I -THE 28 ESAFETYRECOMMENDA
Page 16 and 17: 1.1 Final Report of the eSafety Wor
Page 18 and 19: 1. INTRODUCTION1.1. Towards a safe
Page 20 and 21: Increasing co-operation between the
Page 22 and 23: Programme, administered by Director
Page 24 and 25: 2.2. Taking an integrated approach
Page 27 and 28: Develop validation methodology and
Page 29 and 30: Lane supportLane keeping, lane depa
Page 31 and 32: Safe speed and speed warningThese s
Page 33 and 34: Active pedestrian protection system
Page 35 and 36: Need for further RTD in technologie
Page 37 and 38: 3.8. Emergency Calls (e-Calls) and
Page 39 and 40: Recommendations:(12) After consulta
Page 41 and 42: There is also the forum of the Unit
Page 43 and 44: Vehicle-to-infrastructure communica
Page 45 and 46: Overridable intervention systemsThe
Page 47 and 48: The Short Range Automotive Radar Fr
Page 49 and 50: Towards a positive business caseThe
Page 51 and 52: User Perception of Costs and Benefi
Page 53 and 54:
GSM Global System for Mobile Commun
Page 55 and 56:
Human-Machine Interaction5 Assess t
Page 57 and 58:
13 Establish a European Emergency C
Page 59 and 60:
22 Undertake the standardisation in
Page 61 and 62:
1.2 Progress of the 28recommendatio
Page 63 and 64:
Progress of the 28 RecommendationsL
Page 65 and 66:
European R&D:APROSYS (www.aprosys.c
Page 67 and 68:
Impact assessment of safety systems
Page 69 and 70:
Recommendation number and title:4)
Page 71 and 72:
5. Nomadic devices6. Criteria and V
Page 73 and 74:
Road Map for Intelligent Integrated
Page 75 and 76:
The priority infrastructure-related
Page 77 and 78:
o. Concerning dynamic traffic manag
Page 79 and 80:
The group presented its final resul
Page 81 and 82:
European R&D:- ADASE II (http://www
Page 83 and 84:
eSafety Working Groups:The Internat
Page 85 and 86:
European R&D:ActMAP (www.ertico.com
Page 87 and 88:
Emergency Calls (e-Calls) and E-112
Page 89 and 90:
The Commission also supports the wo
Page 91 and 92:
RDS-TMC receiver deployment is grad
Page 93 and 94:
Motor vehicle type-approval legisla
Page 95 and 96:
Legal issues of market introduction
Page 97 and 98:
Ultra wide-band 24 GHz short range
Page 99 and 100:
Societal aspectsRecommendation numb
Page 101 and 102:
eSafety Working Groups:The Working
Page 103 and 104:
The different business casesRecomme
Page 105 and 106:
Future actions:To support the busin
Page 107 and 108:
The group has analysed some consume
Page 109 and 110:
National activities:(not available)
Page 112:
CHAPTER II -EUROPEAN COMMISSIONESAF
Page 115 and 116:
CHAPTER III -ESAFETY FORUM HIGHLEVE
Page 117 and 118:
3.1 First eSafety High Level Meetin
Page 119 and 120:
6. Collaboration on issues relating
Page 121 and 122:
eCalleCall is a major priority for
Page 123 and 124:
3.3 First eSafety Forum PlenaryMeet
Page 125 and 126:
The next steps identified for the m
Page 127 and 128:
3.4 Second eSafety Forum PlenaryMee
Page 129 and 130:
3.5 eSafety Forum Summary Report200
Page 131 and 132:
1.3.1 The Working GroupsThe Working
Page 133 and 134:
Road MapsThe market introduction of
Page 135 and 136:
a) Existing Data SourcesThe working
Page 137 and 138:
Workplan and Longer term initiative
Page 139 and 140:
• Having recognised the absolute
Page 141 and 142:
The approach taken by the WG-HMI ca
Page 143 and 144:
2.) There is a firm basis for Inter
Page 145 and 146:
4. The International Working Group
Page 147 and 148:
Broadcast frequencies and capacity:
Page 149 and 150:
RecommendationsThe analysis of arou
Page 151 and 152:
2.7 Road Maps WGCo-chairsRisto Kulm
Page 153 and 154:
ImpactBased on results of Road Maps
Page 155 and 156:
Josef HeimannJuhani JaaskelainenJü
Page 157 and 158:
Research and Technology Development
Page 159 and 160:
2.5 The following Working Groups wi
Page 161 and 162:
ANNEX III: Conclusions of the 2nd e
Page 163 and 164:
ERTICO invited its Public Authoriti
Page 165 and 166:
The automotive industry is to co-op
Page 167 and 168:
The In-Vehicle Emergency Call (eCal
Page 169 and 170:
Real-Time Traffic And Travel Inform
Page 171 and 172:
4. Take measures (for example legis
Page 173 and 174:
Progress in eSafetyAs many eSafety
Page 175 and 176:
It was also suggested that the Comm
Page 177 and 178:
3.9 Fourth eSafety Forum PlenaryMee
Page 179 and 180:
3.10 The Second eSafety High LevelM
Page 182 and 183:
CHAPTER IV -ESAFETY WORKINGGROUPS H
Page 184 and 185:
4.1 Accident Causation AnalysisWork
Page 186 and 187:
2. Links with other connected initi
Page 188 and 189:
Annex 1 - ANALYSIS OF EXISTING DATA
Page 190 and 191:
2. Statistical overview of descript
Page 192 and 193:
Annex 2: Questions to be Answered D
Page 194 and 195:
Parameter Generic Question Detailed
Page 196 and 197:
2.2 EvaluationEvaluation in this co
Page 198 and 199:
Annex 3: Accident Causation Analysi
Page 200 and 201:
Annex 4: Accident Causation Analysi
Page 202 and 203:
The Communications Working Group is
Page 204 and 205:
The eSafety partners have also agre
Page 206 and 207:
In addition, the Final Report of th
Page 208 and 209:
Advice applications do not change t
Page 210 and 211:
From the discussions held within MA
Page 212 and 213:
The expected fatality reduction is
Page 214 and 215:
4.1 EuroRoadS4.1.1 DescriptionEuroR
Page 216 and 217:
esults of this survey have to be ma
Page 218 and 219:
4.6 SafeMAP4.6.1 DescriptionThe Saf
Page 220 and 221:
9. When public authorities introduc
Page 222 and 223:
Time planning, meetings and activit
Page 224 and 225:
NameJuhani JaaskelainenElina Holmbe
Page 226 and 227:
The eSafety partners have also agre
Page 228 and 229:
2. Involved PartiesMoving forward w
Page 230 and 231:
To achieve the objectives each part
Page 232 and 233:
Annex A - Relevant European Resolut
Page 234 and 235:
4.5 Heavy Duty Vehicles Working Gro
Page 236 and 237:
4.5.1 Final Report of Heavy Duty Ve
Page 238 and 239:
It was not the role of the Working
Page 240 and 241:
Not all participants were able to a
Page 242 and 243:
The measures were evaluated in qual
Page 244 and 245:
4. Results of the “Accident Resea
Page 246 and 247:
Fatalities1,400Absolute frequency1,
Page 248 and 249:
Fig. 4: “Other party involved”
Page 250 and 251:
4.2.2 Truck accidents with killed o
Page 252 and 253:
Most truck/pedestrian accidents occ
Page 254 and 255:
4.2.5 Basic concept of an EU-wide c
Page 256 and 257:
5.1.4 Seat-belt warningIn spite of
Page 258 and 259:
5.2 Evaluation of the available sys
Page 260 and 261:
5.3.3 Pedestrian protection systemI
Page 262 and 263:
5.4.1 AvailabilityGiven the product
Page 264 and 265:
Fig. 7: System costs of effective a
Page 266 and 267:
5.4.4 AcceptanceAnother important c
Page 268 and 269:
6.1.2 Action prioritiesGiven that t
Page 270 and 271:
6.2.3 Action prioritiesFor all OEMs
Page 272 and 273:
We are grateful for the constant su
Page 274 and 275:
Action Items for the ECCommission A
Page 276 and 277:
Safety Measures Working List - eSaf
Page 278 and 279:
The Working Group took a balanced r
Page 280 and 281:
The importance of a safe human mach
Page 282 and 283:
Finally the Working Group identifie
Page 284 and 285:
1. BackgroundThe importance of a sa
Page 286 and 287:
The attitude of those member states
Page 288 and 289:
The U.S. National Highway Traffic S
Page 290 and 291:
2.3.1 After-Market SystemsDefinitio
Page 292 and 293:
2.4 Multiple Actors - a shared resp
Page 294 and 295:
As already mentioned, specific issu
Page 296 and 297:
The product-responsible organisatio
Page 298 and 299:
Regarding after-market systems and
Page 300 and 301:
R-ESoP-5 Add specific criterion to
Page 302 and 303:
As shown in Annex E some principles
Page 304 and 305:
A certain level of driver workload
Page 306 and 307:
Apart from the nomadic device manuf
Page 308 and 309:
6.4 Authorities6.4.1 Situation Anal
Page 310 and 311:
R-ESoP-7R-ESoP-8R-ESoP-9criteria wo
Page 312 and 313:
R-MS-6R-MS-7R-MS-8R-MS-9R-MS-10R-MS
Page 314 and 315:
ANNEX BESoP - VerificationEU Statem
Page 316 and 317:
3. Information Presentation Princip
Page 318 and 319:
5.1 Visual information not related
Page 320 and 321:
ANNEX CSummary of Member State Resp
Page 322 and 323:
ANNEX DEmployers Responsibilities a
Page 324 and 325:
ANNEX EESoP - AAM-Guideline Compari
Page 326 and 327:
4. Principles on Interaction with D
Page 328 and 329:
EU Statement of Principles AAM-guid
Page 330 and 331:
EU Statement of Principles NPSC Not
Page 332 and 333:
5. System Behaviour PrinciplesEU St
Page 334 and 335:
ANNEX G Installation Recommendation
Page 336 and 337:
Test procedureThe vehicle must be a
Page 338 and 339:
ANNEX HDefinitionsafter-market syst
Page 340 and 341:
C. Evaluation of findings and best/
Page 342 and 343:
• cost for information infrastruc
Page 344 and 345:
j. The industry, European Commissio
Page 346 and 347:
B Qualified ranking for identificat
Page 348 and 349:
Table 2. Description of infrastruct
Page 350 and 351:
5. Assessment of safety impactsIndi
Page 352 and 353:
Table 5. Estimates of new car marke
Page 354 and 355:
7. Implementation issuesThe impleme
Page 356 and 357:
As with all of the driver assistanc
Page 358 and 359:
7.7 eCallOne of the most complex sy
Page 360 and 361:
- take steps to ensure roaming and
Page 362 and 363:
The demand for speed alert is expec
Page 364 and 365:
9. Conclusions and recommendationsT
Page 366 and 367:
The following recommendations were
Page 368 and 369:
Annex 1: Safety effect overviewsPri
Page 370 and 371:
Collision warnings systems are curr
Page 372 and 373:
Dynamic traffic management and loca
Page 374 and 375:
Speed alert systems signalling with
Page 376 and 377:
Nishimura, Y. AND Nagaya, R. (1997)
Page 378 and 379:
Attempt to assess the impact of Tel
Page 380 and 381:
Lane KeepingAssistant andLaneDepart
Page 382 and 383:
Comparing the different values for
Page 384 and 385:
The table below shows the full safe
Page 386 and 387:
% TERN/motorway length covered with
Page 388 and 389:
FBusiness Case / Customer Awareness
Page 390 and 391:
Implementation Issues for Blind Spo
Page 392 and 393:
Blind Spot MonitoringVery highHighM
Page 394 and 395:
technical availability: givenorgani
Page 396 and 397:
Implementation Issues for Obstacle
Page 398 and 399:
Obstacle and collision warningVery
Page 400 and 401:
According to the V analysis of the
Page 402 and 403:
Implementation Issues for eCallASys
Page 404 and 405:
GHKey Success FactorsThe commitment
Page 406 and 407:
Implementation Issues for Extended
Page 408 and 409:
HFeasible Deployment Strategiestech
Page 410 and 411:
Implementation Issues for RTTIASyst
Page 412 and 413:
FBusiness Case / Customer Awareness
Page 414 and 415:
Real-Time Traffic InformationVery h
Page 416 and 417:
- Speed management /speed harmonisa
Page 418 and 419:
can be estimated to be in the range
Page 420 and 421:
A crude estimate of the benefits of
Page 422 and 423:
delivery of safety quality-assured
Page 424 and 425:
A crude estimate of the benefits of
Page 426 and 427:
4. ReportingThe Road Map group repo
Page 428 and 429:
4.8 International Cooperation Worki
Page 430 and 431:
4.9.1 Final Report and Recommendati
Page 432 and 433:
12. The Council of the Transport Mi
Page 434 and 435:
Broadcasted traffic Information to
Page 436 and 437:
This work is still under way. There
Page 438 and 439:
5. Results and Recommendations1. Th
Page 440 and 441:
Annex 1European RDS/TMC-Services in
Page 442 and 443:
4.10.1 Progress Report of the eSafe
Page 444 and 445:
Figure 1: A summary of theEU R&D pr
Page 446 and 447:
• A European/Global market for sa
Page 448 and 449:
Concluding remarksTo reach the ambi
Page 451 and 452:
CHAPTER V -OTHER ESAFETY RELATEDTOP
Page 453 and 454:
5.2 Intelligent Cooperative Systems
Page 455 and 456:
5.2.1 Working Paper on Intelligent
Page 457 and 458:
The Intelligent Transport Standards
Page 459 and 460:
If frequencies in the 5.9 GHz band
Page 461 and 462:
5. Intelligent Cooperative Systems
Page 463 and 464:
CVIS is a 48-month Integrated Proje
Page 465 and 466:
The goal of VII is to evaluate the
Page 467 and 468:
Deployment strategiesFrom the above
Page 470 and 471:
CHAPTER VI -APPENDIXESPage 463 of 4
Page 472 and 473:
ANB: Automatic emergency brake assi
Page 474 and 475:
ECDIS: Electronic Chart Display and
Page 476 and 477:
IETF: Internet Engineering Task For
Page 478 and 479:
RDWS: Road Departure Warning System
Page 480 and 481:
VII: Vehicle-Infrastructure Integra
Page 482 and 483:
ADC (Automatic Distance Control):Th
Page 484 and 485:
BSM (Blind Spot Monitor):Vehicle-ba
Page 486 and 487:
Dynamic control systemsActive Front
Page 488 and 489:
FCW (Front-end Collision Warning):A
Page 490 and 491:
Integral handling control:The syste
Page 492 and 493:
On-Board Safety Monitoring:Manageme
Page 494 and 495:
Traffic information:The provision o
Page 497:
CHAPTER VII -ANNEXESPage 489 of 490
Page 500 and 501:
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNIT
Page 502 and 503:
and actuators, more and more of the
Page 504 and 505:
1. INTRODUCTION1.1. The transport s
Page 506 and 507:
During the last decade, we have mad
Page 508 and 509:
2. REAPING THE BENEFITS OF INFORMAT
Page 510 and 511:
knowledge required to address major
Page 512 and 513:
maintenance typically accounts for
Page 514 and 515:
These systems, when deployed in suf
Page 516 and 517:
Systems 21 , which has been largely
Page 518 and 519:
Commission actions:• To facilitat
Page 520 and 521:
Systems for accelerated standardisa
Page 522 and 523:
oth system design specifications an
Page 524 and 525:
ANNEX 1: GLOSSARY OF TERMSABSACEAAD
Page 526 and 527:
ANNEX 2: SUMMARY OF CONSULTATIONSAl
Page 529 and 530:
ANNEX II - 2ND ESAFETYCOMMUNICATION
Page 531 and 532:
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION T
Page 533 and 534:
2.2 Why do we need eCall ?According
Page 535 and 536:
The Directive on Privacy and Electr
Page 537 and 538:
3. The Member States should upgrade
Page 539:
The eSafety Forum User Outreach Wor
Page 542 and 543:
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNIT
Page 544 and 545:
Concerning energy efficiency and em
Page 546 and 547:
A survey done by EUROTEST 11 on a r
Page 548 and 549:
(2) Produce Commission Recommendati
Page 550 and 551:
will investigate the most appropria
Page 553 and 554:
ANNEX IV - RADIOSPECTRUM POLICY FAC
Page 555:
equipment, typically operated witho
Page 558 and 559:
24.4.2002 L 108/1Official Journal o
Page 560 and 561:
Page 562 and 563:
Page 565 and 566:
ANNEX VI - COMMISSIONDECISION ON TH
Page 567 and 568:
ENL 21/16 Official Journal of the E
Page 569 and 570:
Page 571:
Page 574 and 575:
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONDirectorate-Gene
Page 576 and 577:
frequency range would not be feasib
Page 578 and 579:
d) A review mechanism. The RSC to u
Page 581 and 582:
ANNEX VIII - CEPTREPORT TO THE ECUN
Page 583 and 584:
CEPT1.1.1.1.ECCElectronic Communica
Page 585 and 586:
6 AFTERMARKET FITMENT .............
Page 587 and 588:
− A review process would allow al
Page 589 and 590:
whether the area of such country is
Page 591 and 592:
4. 0 INTRODUCTIONThis draft report
Page 593 and 594:
The FCC Regulation was a controvers
Page 595 and 596:
of the ECC Decision in order to ens
Page 597 and 598:
mandatory after a transitional peri
Page 599 and 600:
In addition, the so-called “2 pha
Page 601 and 602:
Darnhall 53°09'22" N 02°32'03" WJ
Page 603 and 604:
3.3.1 Radio Astronomy ServiceThe sh
Page 605 and 606:
this basis, it is understood that t
Page 607 and 608:
• It is not possible to record in
Page 609 and 610:
Another difficulty is that no gener
Page 611 and 612:
As SRR will operate on non-interfer
Page 613 and 614:
The ECC Decision at 24 GHz is adopt
Page 615:
Committee should establish the nece
Page 618 and 619:
For this to happen, radio spectrum
Page 620 and 621:
) Harmonised standards. A new harmo
Page 622 and 623:
March/July 2004 ECC Decisions Adopt
Page 625 and 626:
ECC/DEC/(04)03EXPLANATORY MEMORANDU
Page 627 and 628:
ECC Decisionof 19 March 2004on the
Page 629 and 630:
ECC/DEC/(04)03DECIDES1. that for th
Page 631 and 632:
ECC/DEC/(0a)xxEUROPEAN CONFERENCE O
Page 633 and 634:
With regard to Fixed Service, altho
Page 635 and 636:
ECC Decisionof DD/MM/YYon the frequ
Page 637 and 638:
percentage of vehicles equipped wit
Page 639 and 640:
DECIDES1. that for the purpose of t
Page 643 and 644:
ANNEX IX -EXPLANATORYMEMORANDUM TO
Page 645 and 646:
10 March 2005Explanatory Memorandum
Page 647 and 648:
The 24 GHz range radio spectrum ban
Page 649 and 650:
CEPT has concluded that protection
Page 651 and 652:
(see below) for the vehicle’s Cer
Page 654 and 655:
ANNEX X - COMMISSIONRECOMMENDATION
Page 656 and 657:
L 189/50ENOfficial Journal of the E
Page 658:
The eSafety InitiativeeSafety websi
show all

eSafety Compendium

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?