eSafety Compendium

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Implementation Issues for Blind Spot Monitoring SystemsASystem descriptionSystems, which give information/warnings to the driver about relevant obstacles in theblind spot around the vehicle, when the driver intends to change the lane. Systems canuse cameras or radar sensors to detect relevant objects.BTechnology AvailabilityAvailable as an option in a few models since 2005 in production.CRoad and Information Infrastructure Need and AvailabilitynoneDOrganisation requirementsnoneERegulatory Requirements / BarriersFor the systems based on 24 GHz short-range radar, the market penetration must notexceed 7%, automatic deactivation in exclusion zones and no new systems after 2013 dueto risk of interference with other systems using the same frequency band. Liabilityproblems need to be solved.FBusiness Case / Customer Awareness and AcceptanceGKey Success FactorsConsumer information, customer awareness and willingness to bear additional cost,driver acceptance (false/missing alarms, HMI), liability.HFeasible Deployment StrategiesPage 385 of 490
technical availability: givenImprove customer business(sensors or camera required)case by insurance and taxincentivesorganisational/regulatoryrequirements: max. penetrationIncrease customer awareness7%, automatic deactivation, nowith EuroNCAP and campaigns24GHz systems after 2013Develop clearer liability policiesinfrastructure req.: noneMove progressively towardsother barriers: cost,widespread availabilityliability concernsuser acceptance: tbdVerify safety(false/missing alarms/HMI)benefitsbusiness case: essential for customers,especially buyers of small cars2005 2010According to the V analysis of the implementation of blind spot monitoring, the measures to betaken include the following:o The safety benefits of blind spot monitoring have to be verified inaccident analyses. This is essential in order to assure public authorities andinsurance companies of the actual benefits before they can make decisionon any incentives.o The industry makes progressively the system available in more models ofnew cars.o Clearer liability policies need to be created in order to safeguard thecustomer’s interests while not hindering the roll-out of the safetyimproving systemso Customer awareness needs to be increased by including and maintainingblind spot monitoring in the EuroNCAP system, which requires that theidentification and performance of various blind spot monitoring indifferent cars can be verified in a satisfactory manner. Informationcampaigns should be carried out about the benefits of blind spotmonitoring, and the information should also be included in the educationprogrammes of driving schools, automobile clubs etc. In addition, cardealer training should include information of the operation and benefitsof blind spot monitoring.o customer business case needs to be improved by tax and/or insuranceincentives making it more attractive to purchase blind spot monitoring -equipped carsWith the help of these measures, the market penetration of blind spot monitoring in new cars inEurope is forecasted as the following up to 2020:Page 386 of 490
Page 1 and 2:
eSafety CompendiumMay 2006
Page 4:
Table of ContentsINTRODUCTION .....
Page 7 and 8:
Page 5 of 490
Page 9 and 10:
Modern society depends heavily on m
Page 11 and 12:
This eSafety Compendium aims to sum
Page 13 and 14:
The Forum Plenary Sessions discuss
Page 15 and 16:
IntroductionThe eSafety High-Level
Page 17 and 18:
· NL - Ministry of Transport, Publ
Page 19 and 20:
Further improvements in safety by t
Page 21 and 22:
The driver is also aware that his c
Page 23 and 24:
For both cars and commercial vehicl
Page 25:
It can be expected that in the near
Page 28 and 29:
Their market introduction is, howev
Page 30 and 31:
Ongoing activities aimed at providi
Page 32 and 33:
Lane supportThese systems decrease
Page 34 and 35:
Most promising for the mitigation o
Page 36 and 37:
Considering these current market si
Page 38 and 39:
Commercial in-vehicle e-Call system
Page 40 and 41:
Public-private partnerships would b
Page 42 and 43:
ETSI, the European Telecommunicatio
Page 44 and 45:
Multi-Media productsThe available a
Page 46 and 47:
Towards a European Code of Practise
Page 48 and 49:
Recommendations:(23) Estimate the s
Page 50 and 51:
Special case: The e-Call business m
Page 52 and 53:
Glossary of Abbreviations and Acron
Page 54 and 55:
Final Report of the eSafety Working
Page 56 and 57:
9 Identify existing specifications,
Page 58 and 59:
17 Support the wider use of the pan
Page 60 and 61:
26 Support the e-Call business mode
Page 62 and 63:
The Working Group on Research and D
Page 64 and 65:
Accident Causation DataRecommendati
Page 66 and 67:
Future actions:The Working Group on
Page 68 and 69:
A survey on “Incentives schemes a
Page 70 and 71:
Human-Machine InteractionRecommenda
Page 72 and 73:
Member States should:• Take measu
Page 74 and 75:
eSafety Working Groups:The Road Map
Page 76 and 77:
d. EuroNCAP should incorporate such
Page 78 and 79:
Intelligent Integrated Road Safety
Page 80 and 81:
Recommendation number and title:9)
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
The European Safety Map databaseRec
Page 86 and 87:
eSafety Working Groups:The Digital
Page 88 and 89:
One of the tasks within the GST Res
Page 90 and 91:
Real-time Traffic and Traveller Inf
Page 92 and 93:
eSafety Working Groups:The RTTI Wor
Page 94 and 95:
Safety systems standards and regula
Page 96 and 97:
• An agreement on these developme
Page 98 and 99:
European R&D:(not available)Nationa
Page 100 and 101:
The socio-economic impact was preli
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
User OutreachRecommendation number
Page 108 and 109:
The eSafety ForumRecommendation num
Page 110:
ConclusionSince the launch of the e
Page 114 and 115:
On the basis of the report of the e
Page 116 and 117:
IntroductionSeveral eSafety High Le
Page 118 and 119:
Creating a positive business case a
Page 120 and 121:
3.2 Second eSafety High Level Meeti
Page 122 and 123:
Role of the eSafety ForumThe eSafet
Page 124 and 125:
3.3.2 General ConclusionsThe first
Page 126 and 127:
HMIThe scope of the work of the HMI
Page 128 and 129:
HMIHuman-Machine Interaction presen
Page 130 and 131:
1.2 The Commission CommunicationBas
Page 132 and 133:
Human-Machine InteractionHuman-Mach
Page 134 and 135:
1.4 eScope: The eSafety Observatory
Page 136 and 137:
• stakeholders can then share and
Page 138 and 139:
o Transporting the eCall data and v
Page 140 and 141:
2.3 Human-Machine Interaction WGCo-
Page 142 and 143:
Development of a detailed workplanF
Page 144 and 145:
18 Regulation Yes Yes Yes See the W
Page 146 and 147:
• Limited motivation of some broa
Page 148 and 149:
• If possible, find some viable o
Page 150 and 151:
R&D focus)Road Infrastructure:• S
Page 152 and 153:
These items are combined into a eSa
Page 154 and 155:
ANNEX I: Members of the eSafety For
Page 156 and 157:
International Co-operation WGMartin
Page 158 and 159:
ANNEX II: Terms of Reference of the
Page 160 and 161:
4.4 The Working Groups will also pr
Page 162 and 163:
3.6 Third eSafety Forum PlenaryMeet
Page 164 and 165:
• EU wide assessment and verifica
Page 166 and 167:
3.7 eSafety High-Level Meeting with
Page 168 and 169:
Recommended Actions for the Member
Page 170 and 171:
Human-Machine Interaction (HMI)With
Page 172 and 173:
3.8 eSafety High Level Meeting with
Page 174 and 175:
A positive business case for eCall,
Page 176 and 177:
Recommendations of the eCall Drivin
Page 178 and 179:
User OutreachThe User Outreach WG s
Page 180:
The In-Vehicle Emergency Call (eCal
Page 183 and 184:
IntroductionThe Working Groups are
Page 185 and 186:
4.1.1 Final Report and Recommendati
Page 187 and 188:
Next stepsThe work to carry out the
Page 189 and 190:
FULFILMENT OF OBJECTIVES 481. Quali
Page 191 and 192:
3. Evaluation• Many methodologies
Page 193 and 194:
2. The needs2.1 DiagnosisParameter
Page 195 and 196:
Parameter Generic Question Detailed
Page 197 and 198:
3.2 Prospective angle• Predict tr
Page 199 and 200:
The working group currently has mem
Page 201 and 202:
4.2 Communications Working GroupDur
Page 203 and 204:
4.3 Digital Maps Working GroupDiscu
Page 205 and 206:
4.3.1 Digital Maps Working Group Fi
Page 207 and 208:
The organisation of the Working Gro
Page 209 and 210:
Intersection Assistance: Informs th
Page 211 and 212:
Hotspot Warning Accident hot spots
Page 213 and 214:
In the second phase the necessary i
Page 215 and 216:
4.2.2 RelationshipThe INSPIRE Direc
Page 217 and 218:
4.4.2 RelationshipSpeed limit infor
Page 219 and 220:
Conclusions: It was agreed by the W
Page 221 and 222:
5. A specification of the following
Page 223 and 224:
Table5 - Shortlist of requirements
Page 225 and 226:
4.4 eCall Driving GroupDiscussions
Page 227 and 228:
4.4.1 Memorandum of Understanding f
Page 229 and 230:
2.4 Vehicle ManufacturersVehicle Ma
Page 231 and 232:
SIGNATURE PAGESRepresentative from(
Page 233 and 234:
4.4.2 eCall Memorandum of Understan
Page 235 and 236:
The Heavy Duty Vehicles Working Gro
Page 237 and 238:
The group analyzed the introduction
Page 239 and 240:
Our efforts to secure active partic
Page 241 and 242:
The workshop on the incidence of ac
Page 243 and 244:
All scores are to be taken as estim
Page 245 and 246:
Previously, these statistics simply
Page 247 and 248:
Examples of published results from
Page 249 and 250:
1Truck singleDriving off roadS E D
Page 251 and 252:
In the analyses of Volvo and IVECO
Page 253 and 254:
There are also some significant lev
Page 255 and 256:
The operating principle of ESP is n
Page 257 and 258:
3,75 m3,75 m0 100 mFig 5: Adaptive
Page 259 and 260:
The Working Group decided against t
Page 261 and 262:
5.3.6 Infrastructure-supported inte
Page 263 and 264:
The Group has also assessed the ava
Page 265 and 266:
All the substantive development wor
Page 267 and 268:
Most of the systems examined here w
Page 269 and 270:
6.2 Legal constraintsIn an age in w
Page 271 and 272:
Intersection assistantInter-vehicle
Page 273 and 274:
Appendix [1] - RecommendationsRecom
Page 275 and 276:
Appendix [2] - Extract from scoring
Page 277 and 278:
4.6 Human-Machine InteractionWorkin
Page 279 and 280:
4.6.1 Recommendations from the eSaf
Page 281 and 282:
More specifically the WG recommends
Page 283 and 284:
The recommendations were presented
Page 285 and 286:
1.2 Member States´ responses 58Fol
Page 287 and 288:
Thus, it can be regarded as hardly
Page 289 and 290:
ADAM - Advanced Driver Attention Me
Page 291 and 292:
The ESoP on HMI clearly covers all
Page 293 and 294:
The driver may have limited knowled
Page 295 and 296:
Example:the box “nomadic system x
Page 297 and 298:
The current version of the ESoP alr
Page 299 and 300:
5. Recommendations on a revised Eur
Page 301 and 302:
As a result of this challenge, the
Page 303 and 304:
Annex F tabulates a comparison of t
Page 305 and 306:
6.1.2 RecommendationsR-SyM-1R-SyM-2
Page 307 and 308:
European Health and Safety Directiv
Page 309 and 310:
Monitoring and Enforcement 78R-MS-5
Page 311 and 312:
Service ProvidersR-SP-1 Service pro
Page 313 and 314:
ANNEX AComposition of WG-HMIThe Wor
Page 315 and 316:
EU Statement of Principles2.5 Visua
Page 317 and 318:
4.4 System controls should be desig
Page 319 and 320:
Section 6.0 Principles on Informati
Page 321 and 322:
German car manufacturers and suppli
Page 323 and 324:
European Health and Safety Directiv
Page 325 and 326:
3. Information Presentation Princip
Page 327 and 328:
5. System Behaviour PrinciplesEU St
Page 329 and 330:
ANNEX FESoP - Draft Japanese Guidel
Page 331 and 332:
4. Principles on Interaction with D
Page 333 and 334:
6.3 System instructions should be i
Page 335 and 336:
Elaboration:Aftermarket IVIS in thi
Page 337 and 338:
The first test should be carried ou
Page 339 and 340: 4.7 Implementation Road MapsWorking
Page 341 and 342: 4.7.1 Final Report and Recommendati
Page 343 and 344: The following recommendations were
Page 345 and 346: The Implementation Road Map WG was
Page 347 and 348: Table 1. Description of vehicle bas
Page 349 and 350: Table 3. Technology prerequisites f
Page 351 and 352: Table 4. Expected safety benefits o
Page 353 and 354: Implementation support% new cars eq
Page 355 and 356: 7.1 ESPThe general key success fact
Page 357 and 358: For most eSafety related functions
Page 359 and 360: floating car data system. An organi
Page 361 and 362: ased systems for producing the nece
Page 363 and 364: 8. Updating of implementation road
Page 365 and 366: In addition to the Implementation R
Page 367 and 368: i. The European Commission should s
Page 369 and 370: Another U.S. study (Farmer 2004) co
Page 371 and 372: eCallConsidering the safety benefit
Page 373 and 374: Influencing vehicle speeds with the
Page 375 and 376: E-MERGE (2004). E-MERGE Compiled Ev
Page 377 and 378: Wakasugi, T. &Yamada, K. (2000). Dr
Page 379 and 380: AdaptiveBrake LightsExtendedenviron
Page 381 and 382: Page 376 of 490
Page 383 and 384: The most efficient ITS applications
Page 385 and 386: Annex 2: Deployment of ITS on the T
Page 387 and 388: Annex 3: Descriptions of implementa
Page 389: satisfactory manner. Information ca
Page 393 and 394: Implementation Issues for Adaptive
Page 395 and 396: Adaptive HeadlightsVery highHighMed
Page 397 and 398: technical availability: given(radar
Page 399 and 400: Implementation Issues for Lane Depa
Page 401 and 402: Road fatalities in EU25 Accident an
Page 403 and 404: C Road and Information Infrastructu
Page 405 and 406: o Finalize infrastructure in all ot
Page 407 and 408: Organisation for Standardisation in
Page 409 and 410: With the help of these measures, th
Page 411 and 412: - the limited capacity in FM which
Page 413 and 414: HFeasible Deployment Strategiestech
Page 415 and 416: Implementation Issues for Dynamic T
Page 417 and 418: different national and even local a
Page 419 and 420: o The safety benefits of all new ty
Page 421 and 422: Implementation Issues for Speed Ale
Page 423 and 424: o In order to deploy an autonomous
Page 425 and 426: Annex 4: Terms of Reference for the
Page 427 and 428: Annex 5: Members of the Implementat
Page 429 and 430: 4.9 Real-time Traffic and Travel In
Page 431 and 432: So, RDS/TMC offers at the time bein
Page 433 and 434: Additionally, the eSafety Forum had
Page 435 and 436: 4. Running Activities and the Inter
Page 437 and 438: The expected answers may not be ver
Page 439 and 440: 6. Steps ahead in the very near Fut
Page 441 and 442:
4.10 Research and DevelopmentWorkin
Page 443 and 444:
*Passive safety is not strictly con
Page 445 and 446:
The project GST aims at creating a
Page 447 and 448:
• Use of potential opportunities
Page 449:
4.11 User Outreach Working GroupThe
Page 452 and 453:
5.1 E112112 is the single emergency
Page 454 and 455:
The introduction of such active saf
Page 456 and 457:
- lower vehicle operating costs- mo
Page 458 and 459:
Services already exist in Europe ba
Page 460 and 461:
- The vehicles in the Co-Operative
Page 462 and 463:
why the eSafety Forum Communication
Page 464 and 465:
5.6 National ActivitiesFleetNet - I
Page 466 and 467:
6.3 International Workshop on Vehic
Page 468:
What should be done?Europe, as the
Page 471 and 472:
6.1 Acronym list3GT: 3rd Generation
Page 473 and 474:
CLI: Caller Line IdentificationCMV:
Page 475 and 476:
FVD: Floating Vehicle data (see als
Page 477 and 478:
MoU: Memorandum of UnderstandingMSC
Page 479 and 480:
TEN: Trans-European NetworkTEN-T: T
Page 481 and 482:
6.2 eSafety Glossary112:The Pan-Eur
Page 483 and 484:
Work is ongoing to refine the ANB d
Page 485 and 486:
DARC (Data Radio Channel):A digital
Page 487 and 488:
EMC (ElectroMagnetic Compatibility)
Page 489 and 490:
GST (Global System for Telematics I
Page 491 and 492:
LBS (Location-Based Services):Servi
Page 493 and 494:
Roll Stability Control system (RSC)
Page 495:
VMS (Variable Message Signs):Roadsi
Page 499 and 500:
ANNEX I - 1ST ESAFETYCOMMUNICATION:
Page 501 and 502:
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSIONTO
Page 503 and 504:
TABLE OF CONTENTSPREFACE...........
Page 505 and 506:
1.3. Urgent actions required in mee
Page 507 and 508:
efficiency and reduction of equipme
Page 509 and 510:
The EU has played a role in this re
Page 511 and 512:
improved vision, driver monitoring
Page 513 and 514:
3. RATIONALE FOR COMMUNITY ACTIONS3
Page 515 and 516:
• Establish national liaison grou
Page 517 and 518:
aimed at accelerating the deploymen
Page 519 and 520:
Furthermore, the Commission encoura
Page 521 and 522:
4.3. Removing the societal and busi
Page 523 and 524:
5. REPORTINGMonitoring of the progr
Page 525 and 526:
GDPGPSGPRSGSMHMIICTISOISTITSNHTSAPS
Page 527:
have welcomed the eSafety Initiativ
Page 530 and 531:
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNIT
Page 532 and 533:
In case of an accident, the eCall d
Page 534 and 535:
PSAP, and adding the costs for trai
Page 536 and 537:
Figure 2: Road Map for eCall roll-o
Page 538 and 539:
eCall has to operate in all GSM and
Page 541 and 542:
ANNEX III - 3RD ESAFETYCOMMUNICATIO
Page 543 and 544:
1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THIS COMMUN
Page 545 and 546:
What is the potential of these inte
Page 547 and 548:
(1) Coordinate and support the work
Page 549 and 550:
Under FP6 a first group of projects
Page 551:
6. CONCLUSIONSThe present Communica
Page 554 and 555:
Radio SpectrumPolicy22Unleashing Eu
Page 557 and 558:
ANNEX V - DECISION ONA REGULATORYFR
Page 559 and 560:
L 108/2 24.4.2002Official Journal o
Page 561 and 562:
Page 563:
Page 566 and 567:
EN25.1.2005 Official Journal of the
Page 568 and 569:
Page 570 and 571:
Page 573 and 574:
ANNEX VII - MANDATETO CEPT TO HARMO
Page 575 and 576:
MANDATE TO CEPT TO HARMONISE RADIO
Page 577 and 578:
Given the mobility within and acros
Page 579:
market penetration of SRR systems a
Page 582 and 583:
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONInformation Soci
Page 584 and 585:
Table of contentsEXECUTIVE SUMMARY.
Page 586 and 587:
2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThis report is
Page 588 and 589:
2. In order to allow early introduc
Page 590 and 591:
. forbidding of after-market salesc
Page 592 and 593:
It shall be further noted that, for
Page 594 and 595:
6. 2 PERMANENT FREQUENCY BAND FOR S
Page 596 and 597:
7. 3 CONSIDERATION OF A TEMPORARY F
Page 598 and 599:
• No compulsory refarming, even l
Page 600 and 601:
The Radio Spectrum Committee and na
Page 602 and 603:
In any case the review is not inten
Page 604 and 605:
limit for SRR's. However, based on
Page 606 and 607:
In order to avoid blocking of the R
Page 608 and 609:
4.2 Protection of the Radio Astrono
Page 610 and 611:
The protection of this fundamental
Page 612 and 613:
The timescales for the designation
Page 614 and 615:
industry. It shall be taken as a cl
Page 617 and 618:
ANNEX 1MANDATE TO CEPT TO HARMONISE
Page 619 and 620:
about a programmed phased approach
Page 621 and 622:
- undertake all necessary technical
Page 623:
Annex 2ECC/DEC/(04)03ELECTRONIC COM
Page 626 and 627:
ECC/DEC/(04)03In order to support i
Page 628 and 629:
ECC/DEC/(04)03studies conducted by
Page 630 and 631:
ANNEX Annex 36to Doc ECC(04)53 Rev1
Page 632 and 633:
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM13. INTRODUCT
Page 634 and 635:
15. REQUIREMENT FOR AN ECC DECISION
Page 636 and 637:
services and/or wide economical int
Page 638 and 639:
x) that ECC Report 046 shows that S
Page 640:
7. that the percentage of vehicles
Page 644 and 645:
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONInformation Soci
Page 646 and 647:
B. the temporary designation of 24
Page 648 and 649:
harmful interference is an essentia
Page 650 and 651:
For that purpose, several actions w
Page 652:
On this final point, where the maxi
Page 655 and 656:
29.7.2003 ENOfficial Journal of the
Page 657 and 658:
29.7.2003 L 189/51Official Journal
show all

eSafety Compendium

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?